Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for سیامک رستمی

Channel

سیامک رستمی

@Rostami_Siamak

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

10,568subscribers

+135 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002149071433
TypeChannel
Username@Rostami_Siamak
Descriptionدر گسترش و گوالش زبان پارسی و فرهنگ ایرانشهری Дар густаришу гуволиши забони Порсӣ ва фарҳанги Эроншаҳрӣ
CreatedBetween 1 April 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Rostami_Siamak

Growth

10,43310,57610,504.56 August 2026 — 10,433 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,437 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,439 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,436 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,440 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,519 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,561 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,576 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,568 subscribers10,5686 August 202615 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net +135. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,412–10,597 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 04:1910,568-8
13 Aug 2026, 18:1710,576+15
12 Aug 2026, 17:4510,561+42
11 Aug 2026, 20:1210,519+79
10 Aug 2026, 19:1510,440+4
9 Aug 2026, 16:2310,436-3
8 Aug 2026, 15:0110,439+2
7 Aug 2026, 15:1010,437+4
6 Aug 2026, 22:3110,433first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.2%
avg views ÷ 10,568 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,350
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held38 (31 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total89,299
Reactions total3,526
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,010
Videos
842
Links
195

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
23m 30s
Average length
1m 48s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,526 reactions across 38 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,39639.6%
👍1,32837.7%
👏36110.2%
👌792.24%
🔥631.79%
👎531.50%
💯481.36%
🤷‍♂320.908%
😍290.822%
🏆250.709%
🙏230.652%
🤯140.397%
🫡140.397%
🕊90.255%
😎90.255%
💔80.227%
😡60.17%
😢50.142%
🤩50.142%
🤷‍♀50.142%
7 further kinds140.397%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,526reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC≈1,100 views80 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

ریشۀ پسوند ـجرد/ـگرد در نام شهرها: بروجرد، دستجرد، لاسجرد، ملازگرد، هشتگرد، سوسنگرد، دارابگرد و... #ریشه_شناسی @Rostami_Siamak

43👍21👏8👎2💯2🙏2🏆1👌1

15 Aug 2026, 08:21 UTC909 views48 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

بررسی ریشۀ واژگان: Pencil ✏️ ≈ Penicillin 💉 ≈ Penis 🖕 📚 بن‌مایه: Etymonline.com #ریشه_شناسی @Rostami_Siamak

👍318👏4🏆2👌1💯1🙏1

14 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC≈1,320 views65 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

«ایدئولوژی» چه آسیب‌هایی دارد؟ 🔻 پیشنهاد می‌کنم این سخنان استاد مصطفی ملکیان را تا پایان بخوانید: t.me/mostafamalekian/7859 @Rostami_Siamak

28👍15👏10👎5👌2🔥2🏆1💯1

12 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC≈1,790 views107 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🌍 پارسی در جهان 🔸 زبان پارسی، افزون بر ایران، افغانستان و تاجیکستان که زبان رسمی به‌شمار می‌رود، در چه بخش‌های دیگری از جهان کاربرد دارد؟ 🎙️ امیر موسوی، جهانگرد و راهنمای گردشگری، در گفت‌وگو با سیامک رستمی به این پرسش پاسخ می‌دهد. #جهان_پارس @Rostami_Siamak

69👍20😍6👏5💯2🏆1👌1🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC≈1,790 views85 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

گورشکافی (نبش قبر) آرامگاهِ نیما یوشیج، پدر شعر نو پارسی علی اسفندیاری (نیما یوشیج)، پدر شعر نو پارسی، در ۱۶ دی ۱۳۳۸ در ۶۲ سالگی درگذشت. او وصیت کرده بود پیکرش در زادگاهش، یوش، به خاک سپرده شود؛ اما به‌دلیل سرمای سخت و دشواری سفر زمستانی، او را در امام‌زاده عبدالله شهر ری به خاک سپردند. ۳۴ سال پس از مرگش، در شهریور ۱۳۷۲، خانواده‌اش پیکر او را از خاک بیرون آوردند و به یوش بردند و در حیاط خانهٔ پدری‌اش به خاک سپردند؛

43👍21🔥7👏4🕊4🙏2❤‍🔥1👌1

11 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC≈1,870 views90 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

ریشه‌شناسی نام کشور کره 🇰🇷🇰🇵 خود مردم این سرزمین، کشورشان را چه می‌نامند؟ @Rostami_Siamak

49👍26👏7🔥4🏆1👌1💯1🫡1

11 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC≈1,740 views62 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

نمادشناسی پرچم کره جنوبی 🇰🇷 @Rostami_Siamak

👏31👍138👌4🔥3💯1🫡1🙏1

11 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC≈1,890 views114 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

چرا نباید بگوییم «دریای خزر»؟ احمد کاظمی، کارشناس مسائل بین‌الملل، در گفت‌وگو با رسانهٔ تصویری «آن»: 🔸 به‌کاربردن نام «دریای خزر» به‌جای «دریای کاسپین» یا «دریای مازندران»، از دید برخی، بخشی از روندی آگاهانه برای کنارگذاشتن نام‌های کهن این دریاست؛ زیرا «خزر» نام قومی در قفقاز شمالی بوده است که در روزگار باستان و میانه در این پهنه می‌زیستند و با همسایگان خود درگیر بودند. 🔸 در برابر، نام «کاسپین» ریشه در نام قوم ایر

👍68👏2111👎6👌3🔥2🏆1💯1

10 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC≈2,220 views50 reactionsread 15 August 2026

💥 دوستان پیشنهاد میکنم به کانال « ایران‌زمین بپیوندید » 👇 حرف نداره 👌👌 https://t.me/+PxbVrsJp_tI7oPZE 💢 آشنایی با تاریخ و فرهنگ ایران‌زمین‌ و پاسخ به شبهات ایران‌ستیزان، بر پایه منابع معتبر، نسخ خطی و اسناد پژوهشی ... لینک عضویت : https://t.me/+PxbVrsJp_tI7oPZE .

27👌11👍6💯2🔥2👏1😍1

9 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC≈5,090 views174 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🏔️ راز نام‌های دماوند، الوند، اروند و البرز اگر بخواهیم این چهار نام را در چهار نگارۀ ساده به یاد بسپاریم: 🌫️ دماوند = دم و بخار 🌊 اروند = تند و خروشان 🏔️ الوند = تند و پرشتاب ⛰️ البرز = بلند و برافراشته #ریشه_شناسی @Rostami_Siamak

119👍33👏9🏆3🔥2🫡2😍2👌1

9 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC≈2,060 views104 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

تاکنون کُردی سخن گفتن استاد کزازی را دیده بودید؟ 🥰🌹 @Rostami_Siamak

78👍9👏5❤‍🔥3🔥3👌1👎1💯1

9 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC≈1,970 views81 reactionsread 15 August 2026

اگر یکی‌دو تن با تو ناسازگارند، می‌توانی بگویی شاید ایراد از آنان باشد؛ اما اگر همهٔ جهان با تو ناسازگارند، آن هنگام بهتر است درنگ کنی و ایراد را در خودت بجویی. #سخن_بزرگان @Rostami_Siamak

👍5413👏5🔥3👌2👎2🏆1💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @Rostami_Siamak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Rostami_Siamak edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 35,120 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“سیامک رستمی” (@Rostami_Siamak), 10,568 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rostami_Siamak.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.