Channel
@ira_gerk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
814subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001558458471 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ira_gerk |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ira_gerk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:36 | 814 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:29 | 813 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 816 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 818 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 823 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:27 | 823 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 14 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
38 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 21 | 55.3% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 31.6% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 7.89% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2025 to 31 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сейчас в интерьере один из трендов — это деревянные панели. И если раньше достаточно просто было гладких панелей и это смотрелось хорошо. То сейчас панели нужно все сильнее и сильнее усложнять по внешнему виду, и только тогда это смотрится хорошо! Усложнение — это нормально, это веяние времени. Но вот другое дело, что бесспорно это усложнение бьет по цене, так как, элементарно, увеличивается при изготовлении объем и …
👍11😍2❤1
Спасибо всем, кто голосовал. Это ценно! Ну если большинства тут интересуют вопросы дизайна, то постараюсь им уделять больше внимания. Сегодня хочу поднять тему настенных молдингов. Это уже почти мастхев многих интерьеров. Стиль - не обязательно классика. Можно уже и в современных помещениях сделать рисунок из молдингов, который будет классно смотреться. Было бы желание и (это не маловажно) - четко вписанный рисунок …
🔥12
Друзья, какие темы для вас наиболее актуальны сейчас👇
The shares total 142%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Я плотно взаимодействую с производителями мебели (которые делают в том числе и кухни на заказ) и знаю о большом количестве подводных камней при изготовлении мебели. Один из таких часто встречающихся в последнее время «камней» — это встроенная посудомоечная машина. Раньше, все было просто — поставил машинку, подрезал цоколь (чтобы при открывании цоколь не мешал фасаду) и все отлично: дверь у машинки открывается полно…
👍4❤2
Одна из частых ошибок в ремонте при комплектации — откладывание закупок на потом. Как правило, всегда есть четкий план и регламент, в котором все прописывается. НО! Также в процессе закупки по этому плану, все сопутствующие товары откладываются на потом. К примеру, покупая напольную доску, приобретайте сразу плинтус (сразу удобнее сравнивать цвета); Покупая одни обои, старайтесь сразу подобрать компаньоны к ним, ил…
👍6
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @ira_gerk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Друзья, какие темы для вас наиболее актуальны сейчас👇
The shares total 142%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2025 to 31 March 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ira_gerk о дизайне интерьера” (@ira_gerk), 814 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ira_gerk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.