Channel
@iq_english
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,866subscribers
-1,282 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001027039605 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iq_english |
| Created | Between 1 January 2016 and 31 March 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 37 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iq_english |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 32 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @v999v/10577119 Jun 2025, 10:01 UTC | @iq_english/8923 · this entry19 Jun 2025, 10:01 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @v999v/10585821 Jun 2025, 07:05 UTC | @iq_english/8928 · this entry21 Jun 2025, 07:05 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @v999v/10825114 Sept 2025, 12:45 UTC | @iq_english/8935 · this entry14 Sept 2025, 12:47 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @v999v/1087923 Oct 2025, 12:06 UTC | @iq_english/8941 · this entry3 Oct 2025, 12:06 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @v999v/10931825 Oct 2025, 10:42 UTC | @iq_english/8949 · this entry25 Oct 2025, 10:45 UTC | 1.00 | 3 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @v999v | 9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @v999v (8–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 12 comparable posts for this entry, running 19 June 2025 to 15 June 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 32, the earliest publisher we hold is @iraqed4. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 31 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 06:16 | 23,866 | -455 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 24,321 | -47 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:58 | 24,368 | -25 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 24,393 | -22 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 01:21 | 24,415 | -47 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:56 | 24,462 | -101 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 24,563 | -68 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 24,631 | -38 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:03 | 24,669 | -36 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:03 | 24,705 | -52 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:05 | 24,757 | -16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 24,773 | -25 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 24,798 | -29 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 24,827 | -11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 24,838 | -12 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 24,850 | -17 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 24,867 | -12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 24,879 | -16 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:06 | 24,895 | -17 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 24,912 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 19 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
❗️اسئلة مـادة اللغة الانكليزية الدور الثاني 2026 السادس الاعدادي الانشاءات جاءت نصآ من المرشحات 📌 شارك المنشور مع أصدقائك لتعم الفائدة وتصلكم جميع المراجعات القادمة: ✈️|| https://t.me/iraqedu
مراجعة ليلة الامتحان لمادة اللغة الانكليزية للسادس العلمي والادبي للدور الثاني 2026 المراجعة 18 ورقة فقط = 100 درجة 📌 شــارك المنشور مع اصدقاءك لتصلك جميع المرشحات والملخصات عبر الرابط👇 ✅|| https://t.me/v999v
مراجعة ليلة الامتحان لمادة اللغة الانكليزية للسادس العلمي والادبي نزلت عبر الموقع الرسمي حملها ساعة واحذفها المراجعة 18 ورقة فقط = 100 درجة 🌐للتحميل المباشر [ اضــغــط هــنا ] 📌 شــارك المنشور مع اصدقاءك لتصلك جميع المرشحات والملخصات عبر الرابط👇 ✅|| https://t.me/iraqedu
📘 السادس الإعدادي – التحديثات الجديدة في مادة الإنكليزي ▪️ القطع (Reading): أصبح المطلوب 13 قطعة بدل 17 🎁 تم حذف 4 قطع وهي التي تقع ضمن الوحدة السابعة والثامنة ▪️ الإنشاء (Writing): أصبح العدد 11 إنشاء بدل 14 🎁 تم حذف 3 إنشاءات ▪️ الأدب (Literature): ✔️ مطلوب بالكامل دون حذف يشمل: الرواية + المسرحية 🔹 المجموع: 12 سكشن
الامتحانات الوزارية لطلبة الدور الثالث 🔹اللغة الانكليزية - الدور الثالث 🔹لطلبة السادس الاعدادي 2025 🔹مرشحات الانشاءات نصآ جتي 🔹نسبة الملخص الذهبي 135 درجة للمزيد تابعنا هنا 🔹 @V999V
#الدورة_الالكترونية_المجانية ❗️ الدورة #المجانية لمادة اللغة الانكليزية | للصف السادس العلمي والادبي 2026 ❗️ للأستاذة | #أزل_سلوان 📌أساسيـات اللغة الانكليزية : قائمة تشغيل أساسيات اللغة الانكليزية 5 محاضرات فقط تضبط الاساسيات لطلبة السادس الاعدادي لسنة 2026 : 🖤|| https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrWyeAgW0CwoKRPF1-tjdHzs57Axgeq2F&si=XBbOFPeCNTFCqMLV 📌اليونت الاول ✨المنهج الجديد : قائمة تشغيل اليونت الاول - 2…
💡بسم الله ...... تبدأ دوراتكم المجانية 🫶 لمادة #اللغة_الانكليزية بعون الله تعالى يوم الجمعة القادمة 2026/10/10 الدورة المجانية 📋 الدورة الالكترونية تتضمن 1⃣محاضرات يوتيوب 2⃣اختبار بعد كل محاضرة 3⃣اجوبة نموذجية لكل اختبار 4⃣ملازم + ملخصات لكل وحدة الدورة تحت أشراف أ.أزل سلوان 📌شارك رابط الدورة الالكترونية مع أصدقاءك من خلال الرابط الرسمي : https://t.me/iq_english
#عــــــــــاجـــــــــــــل 🔴 || المنهج الجديد لطلبة السادس الاعدادي اللغة الانكليزية ✅اليونت الثالث + ✅ اليونت الرابع مع دليل اللغة الانكليزية للجزء الاول شارك المنشور ليصل للجميع : https://t.me/iraqedu
#عاجــــل || تغييرات كتاب اللغة الانكليزية وزارة التربية تقرر تغيير منهج اللغة الانكليزية للصف السادس الاعدادي 2026 إليكم أبرز التغييرات التي طرأت على المنهج الجديد : الأدب (Literature): تم استبدال الأدب الانكليزي والعراقي بـ أدب أمريكي حديث النصوص الأدبية ستكون على شكل 3 مقاطع (Sections). تم تضمين أسئلة نمطية ثابتة لكل قطعة أدبية لتسهيل الفهم والحفظ القطع الاستيعابية (Reading Passages): تم إجراء تغييرات بسيطة فق…
الاجوبة النموذجية 2025 اللغة الانكليزية دور 2
🔹🔹المراجعة الذهبية 2025 🔹🔹اللغة الانكليزية للدورين 1و2 🔹🔹السادس الاعدادي 29 ورقة فقط 🔹🔹ضمان الدرجة الكاملة بالوزاري العام السابق حصلت المراجعة الذهبية على الدرجة الكاملة وتعتبر المراجعة الاولى بالعراق اعداد - أ.ازل سلوان 🔹تابع قناتنا الرسمية لنشر النتائج والمرشحات المهمة اضغط هنا للانضمام : 👇 🔹 || https://t.me/iraqedu
بعد إنتهاء الوقت الرسمي للامتحان نرفق إليكم اسئلة مادة اللغة الانكليزية لطلبة السادس الادبي الدور الاول 2025 اضغط هنا لمشاهدة المرشحات 🔹لمتابعة النتائج والمرشحات المهمة يمكنك الان الاشتراك في قناتنا عبر الرابط 👇 🔹 || https://t.me/iraqedu
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @iq_english. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اللغة الانكليزية 6 | نيمار ابن الانبار” (@iq_english), 23,866 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iq_english.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.