Академический форум IVSC открыл прием заявок на премию Global Showcase of Excellence in Valuation Education — международную выставку образовательных решений в сфере оценки. Срок - до 31.08.2026 Категории: инновационные программы, преподавание и оценка обучения. До 31 августа 2026 года необходимо бесплатно подать на английском языке резюме объемом 300–500 слов, описание модуля и доказательства эффекта. Условия: http…

Channel
Школа IP-оценщиков ⚖️
@ipvaluationschool
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
974subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001235241218 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ipvaluationschool |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ipvaluationschool |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 974 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 971 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 971 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.30%
- avg views ÷ 974 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 61.4
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.37%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,227 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
5 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 80.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Продолжаем работу над ошибками — и постепенно собираем их в единую систему. На схеме — «иерархическое дерево» ошибок в оценке интеллектуальной собственности и нематериальных активов. Его задача — помочь не просто обнаружить спорное место в отчете, заключении или расчете, а понять, ГДЕ именно нарушено профессиональное рассуждение. В рабочей модели выделены пять первичных классов: 🔵 Узловые ошибки — поврежден сам ко…
Присоединяйтесь к обсуждению: что считать ошибкой в учебном материале по оценке ИС и НМА? Мы предлагаем обсудить ключевое определение, от которого зависит качество будущих задач, тестов, кейсов и вопросников для подготовки IP-оценщиков, судебных экспертов и преподавателей. Ошибка в учебном материале по оценке ИС и НМА - это нарушение корректной связи между учебным тезисом и его правовой, оценочной, расчетной, доказ…
Обратите внимание на изменение нормативных актов #консультант+ #консультантплюс
На картинке два товарных знака со словесным элементом «БРЯНСКИЕ КОЛБАСЫ»: — товарный знак № 351625 имел приоритет с 24.05.2006, но его правовая охрана прекратилась в 2013 году; — товарный знак № 701261 имеет приоритет с 16.08.2018. Между ними возникает особенно интересный для оценщика период: с 08.05.2013 по 15.08.2018. Представим, что эксперту поставили вопрос: 🔥 «В каком диапазоне находилась рыночная стоимость…
Как связано арбитражное дело № А32-13615/2026 с определением рыночной ставки роялти за использование товарного знака "Металлург" по свидетельству РФ № 961809 (36, 39, 41, 43, 44 классы МКТУ)? #металлург #ipоценка #ipэкспертиза
Кейс: как "непоказанные фильмы" превратились в 620 млн руб. упущенной выгоды Дело № А40-182977/2025-7-2264. АО "Синема Парк" предъявило иск к ООО "Контент-Клуб" - бывшему ООО "Сони Пикчерс Продакшнс энд Релизинг" - о взыскании упущенной выгоды. В определении о назначении экспертизы размер требований составлял 473 771 119,57 руб., а в решении суда - уже 620 263 503,47 руб. с учетом уточнений. Фабула: после февраля…
РЕМИТ ПРОТИВ СИДОРЕНКО: КОГДА «МЕРКУРИЙ» МОЖЕТ УВЕЛИЧИТЬ ИСК В РАЗЫ В Арбитражном суде Брянской области рассматривается дело № А09-5/2026. Истец: ООО «Мясоперерабатывающий завод РЕМИТ», ИНН 7715213200. Ответчик: ИП Сидоренко Артем Алексеевич, ИНН 323407723352. Спор связан с компенсацией за нарушение исключительных прав на товарные знаки. В январе 2026 года иск составлял 2 млн руб., а к 26 мая - уже 5 млн руб. Клю…
📚 Новинка 2026: «Trademarks and Free Speech: Conflicts and Resolutions» Cambridge University Press выпустило книгу Lisa P. Ramsey «Trademarks and Free Speech: Conflicts and Resolutions» — исследование о границах товарного права, свободе выражения и добросовестной конкуренции. Автор показывает, что ценность обозначения не всегда создается правообладателем. Слово, изображение, цвет, форма или лозунг могут иметь собст…
Кейс «Ждун»: как Василий Фомин вернул миллионный спор к масштабу фактического использования Дело № А41-77895/2025. Истец ООО «СИ ДИ ЛЭНД КОНТАКТ» требовал с ООО «ВиВиТрек» 1 000 000 руб. компенсации за использование произведения «Ждун». Расчет истца опирался на заключение эксперта № 0612-24 от 19.12.2024, где стоимость права использования на дату 04.08.2024 была определена в 2 034 300 руб. Двукратная величина по эт…
👍4
Когда Big Data становятся Big Problem: парадокс воспроизводимой ошибки в оценке Представим идеальный цифровой результат. Алгоритм определил ставку роялти — 5,2%. Второй эксперт получил 5,2%. Десятый — 5,2%. Сто повторных расчетов — снова 5,2%. Получили научно надежный результат? Пока нет. Мы доказали только одно: алгоритм воспроизводим. Он может столь же безупречно воспроизводить ошибочную постановку задачи, несоп…
Готовим к изданию новое методическое пособие Школы оценщиков интеллектуальной собственности Завершается подготовка к изданию методического пособия Александра Валерьевича Костина: «Логические ошибки в оценке интеллектуальной собственности и нематериальных активов: воспроизводимая диагностика профессионального рассуждения, оценка влияния и соразмерное исправление». Пособие посвящено системной проверке обоснованности …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ipvaluationschool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Нормативно-методическую базу по IP-оценке и судебным экспертизам какой страны вы знаете лучше всего?
- Беларусь0%
- Казахстан0%
- Армения0%
- Кыргызстан0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 407,098 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Школа IP-оценщиков ⚖️” (@ipvaluationschool), 974 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ipvaluationschool.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.