Channel
@ipnxz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
33,967subscribers
-91 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003537861871 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @ipnxz @tgnf1 |
| Description | 新闻曝光各种世界资讯 南希业务频道 @svip833 南希新闻频道 @ipnxz 南希聊天群 @nanxidb 官方負責人 @nanxi |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ipnxz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 33,967 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 33,967 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 33,977 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 33,977 | -21 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 33,998 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 33,998 | -21 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:11 | 34,019 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:21 | 34,019 | -20 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 34,039 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 34,039 | -19 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 34,058 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 34,058 | first reading |
32 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 32 (3 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 255,140 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 21:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🇺🇸美国FBI局长披露“黑夜行动”成果 在特朗普总统的领导下，联邦调查局正在主动出击，直捣窃取美国人毕生积蓄的全球诈骗网络。代号为“黑夜行动”（Operation Blackout）的行动取得了以下历史性成果： → 查扣了价值152亿美元的非法资产 → 捣毁了数十个诈骗中心 → 逮捕了数百名犯罪分子 → 解救了数千名人口贩运受害者 → 关闭了7500多个互联网终端 → 向近9000名潜在受害者发出了预警 → 避免了约5.62亿美元的潜在损失 这些诈骗中心并非简单的呼叫中心，而是跨国犯罪企业，从事人口贩运，洗钱数十亿美元，并且从海外针对美国人实施犯罪活动。 ——联邦调查局局长卡什· 帕特尔 ✅订阅频道：@ipnxz 🛎爆料投稿：@nanxi
#柬埔寨资讯：警方突查涉嫌未成年人性剥削场所 34人被控制包括5名未成年人 近日，柬埔寨国家警察总署反人口贩卖和保护未成年人局联合地方执法部门，在干丹省昂斯努县姆卡克乡特拉平克朗村开展专项行动，对一家名为“金占比”的店铺进行突击检查。 据警方通报，该场所涉嫌存在隐藏性未成年人性剥削活动（儿童卖淫）的违法行为。执法人员在行动中对现场人员进行控制，并展开身份核查及调查取证工作。此次行动共控制34人，其中女性31人，包括5名未成年人。目前，相关人员已被带往柬埔寨国家警察总署接受进一步调查。 警方表示，涉案未成年人将按照法律程序，在完成询问和身份确认后，移交金边市社会事务、退伍军人和青年改造部门进行安置保护，并提供必要的法律援助和社会支持。对于涉嫌违法犯罪的人员，警方将继续依法调查，并在证据充分后移送法院处理。 ✅订阅频道：@ipnxz 🛎爆料投稿：@nanxi
数万电诈人员回流柬埔寨？ 据报道，最近有不少灰产人员回流柬埔寨，包括从马来西亚、缅甸等地返回柬埔寨的人员。另据官方数据，最近有10万名中国人入境柬埔寨。 有媒体援引柬埔寨移民总局局长宋斯威那公布的数据称，自免签政策以来至8月2日，已经有超过10万名中国人入境柬埔寨。其中4.45万人左右是以旅游目的免签入境，其余超过5.55万人持商务签等其他类型签证入境。 据《柬媒在线》报道，多名中资酒店餐饮、中介从业者表示最近有部分灰产从业者回流柬埔寨。其中有些是因为缅甸、老挝严打电诈返回柬埔寨，有些是因为马来西亚、泰国等地签证问题返回。 “虽然柬埔寨的打击动作很大，但一些盘口还是决定硬上。” 在严打的压力下，有部分柬埔寨灰产人员开始返回柬埔寨试图寻找出路。据了解，七星海、财通、木牌等地已经有不少盘口开工。 陈志在今年1月宣布被抓后，财通金运、金湾等园区迅速搬空，是柬埔寨电诈人员最早开始转移的地方。 但目前，柬埔寨官方在财通再次发…
#缅甸资讯：木姐查获疑似网络诈骗窝点：60名中国籍男子被捕，缴获大量设 据当地消息，8月11日上午10时35分左右，缅甸掸邦木姐地区开展执法行动，在木姐朵越沙滩路口正对面的第二条道路附近一处民宅内，发现并查处一处疑似从事网络诈骗活动的窝点。行动中，执法人员现场抓获60名涉嫌参与网络诈骗的中国籍男子，并查扣大量涉案电子设备。 据悉，现场共缴获手机85部、一体机电脑11台、StarLink设备2套、移动电源2台、笔记本电脑4台、UPS电源1台、摩托车2辆以及其他相关设备。目前，涉案人员已被有关部门控制，案件正在进一步调查处理中。警方将对涉案人员身份、设备数据以及是否涉及跨境网络诈骗活动展开核查。 ✅订阅频道：@ipnxz 🛎爆料投稿：@nanxi
#网友曝光 #斯里兰卡 #杨树 此人说自己是广东佛山人 身份证是广西的 他先立富二代人设，说自己什么都不会，实际毫无富二代气质，还总装逼、在背后挑拨离间所有人关系。因为没还别人钱，被逼迫发出身份证和护照照片 之后他装柔弱博取同情，再以账号被封控无法兑换钱款为由，骗我1700美元在此之前支付宝还欠1000人民币又pua我给他在会所点小姐8万卢比，骗其他受害者共100多万斯里兰卡卢比，还谎称已回国，实际当时仍在斯里兰卡，具体在哪个角落不清楚才让他得以逃脱 不是大规模的骗钱骗得都是小钱但是伎俩拙劣低下都是骗熟人 欺骗同情心和信任心女人的钱都骗 还有护照和身份证照片十级美颜本人屌丝一个 天天炫耀自己的表和鞋 实际上都是假的所有照片都是摆拍和人设 还谎称自己要低调一点有人要绑架他全部都是骗取同情心 ✅订阅频道：@ipnxz 🛎爆料投稿：@nanxi 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
#群友投稿：菲律宾女孩在馬來西亞的孕妇在公寓里吊架，因為他的中国男朋友抛弃了她和孩子。 PS：拔吊无情了哎 这男的真不是个东西 ✅订阅频道：@ipnxz 🛎爆料投稿：@nanxi
网友：Sonamu Restaurant｜韩餐套餐89迪起 最近去 Sonamu Restaurant 吃了顿饭～餐厅在酒店的 M层，整体环境还蛮舒服的。 目前有 89 AED/人 和 109 AED/人 两种套餐可以选，除了主菜之外，其他菜品都可以无限续，这一 点还是挺适合多人一起吃的，基本可以放开点😂 不过最让我印象深刻的是—— 本来想点杯饮品，结果一看菜单： 几千、上万迪的酒水……我是喝不了一点🤣🤣 最后非常朴实地选择了： 💧 一瓶1.5L水 18 AED 炸豆腐好吃，泡菜锅好吃（内含猪肉，在这真的不容易 ）鱼肉不喜欢 ✅订阅频道：@ipnxz 🛎爆料投稿：@nanxi
柬埔寨知名大学校刊揭露网赌电诈头目陈志 8月11日柬埔寨高考次日，柬埔寨知名高校诺顿大学（Norton University）推出厚达百页的吸引眼球的全新校刊《The Herald》，面向即将升入大学的高校生。 该刊物除展现校友风采及国际国内大事外，重点引入了电诈治理等关键社会议题。令人关注的是，校刊专门揭露了太子集团掌门人陈志及其网赌电诈犯罪案，详述其如何从打着慈善旗号的所谓年轻企业家沦为跨国犯罪头目。 据悉，经过中柬两国警方数月联合调查，陈志已于2026年1月6日与两名同伙在柬埔寨被捕并押解回中国。校方借此呼吁青年学生认清网络犯罪危害，同时欢迎广大学子报考诺顿大学。 ✅订阅频道：@ipnxz 🛎爆料投稿：@nanxi
#国内新闻 离谱急诊61 岁男子把17cm 红薯塞入肛门被卡住，被迫开腹手术取出 📌事件经过 #成都 一名 61 岁男子深夜 11 点，自行把一根长 17cm、直径 6‑7cm 的红薯塞进肛门，异物卡在直肠无法取出。 熬到凌晨 4 点剧痛难忍，只能赶往肛肠专科医院急诊。 📌艰难施救过程 医生先是尝试捣碎红薯、借助红酒开瓶器牵引取出，全都失败； 此时肠道已经充血水肿，迫于无奈开展中转开腹手术，切开肠道才顺利取出异物。 #肛肠科急诊 #危险行为警示 #社会趣闻资讯 ✅订阅频道：@ipnxz 🛎爆料投稿：@nanxi
#群友投稿：东南亚狗推的真正问题：不是粉，而是态度 许多东南亚狗推经常抱怨——粉不好、客户难搞、公司模式差、压力太大。但这些真的是根本问题吗？其实，95%以上的盘总，最初都是从狗推做起的。 没有人能一步登天，和客户建立信任、促成合作，都需要时间和积累。很多狗推只顾着抱怨，却忽略了最关键的一点：执行力与态度。 同样的话术、相似的客户资源，为什么有人能快速开单签大单，而你却不行？差别就在于——当你在争论、拖延、抽烟消磨时间时，别人已经在抓紧和客户建立感情，推动合作。 公司并非要打压员工，而是讨厌懒惰和怨天尤人的人。即便业绩暂时不理想，只要努力，主管也会看到并认可。不管有没有入金，都要拿出自己的聊客态度，一点耐心和思路都没有，怎么让客户入金么，还有一些人，就是看现在大环境不好，混日子 。一天一天的过去了，到底是在糊弄自己还是糊弄公司呢 ？如果连基本的狗推工作都做不好，又凭什么有人扶持你成为盘总？ 很多人通过狗推一步步做到盘总…
#最新消息：三角特外东鹏医院酒店被冲后续，据说现场都是中国帽子直接接送，被抓的中国人已经扎带换手铐了！ ✅订阅频道：@ipnxz 🛎爆料投稿：@nanxi
熟客作案！继金边之后，菲律宾中国超市老板也遭熟人绑架 近日，报道了金边旧机场附近一名中国超市老板遭熟客绑架的案件。菲律宾近日也发生了一起手法高度相似的恶性绑架案，受害者同样是一名经营连锁超市的中国老板，勒索金额高达100万美元。 据报道，事件发生于8月2日深夜。监控画面显示，当晚11时39分50秒，受害男子正驾驶一辆黑色轿车准备倒车，一辆白色面包车突然从后方将其截停。车上迅速冲下5名持枪劫匪，其中有人持有AK47，强行将受害者押上面包车。 11点40分15秒左右，白色面包车离开现场。从拦截到将人挟持带离，绑匪仅用了不到25秒，动作极度干练利落。 据报道，绑匪向受害者家属索要100万美元赎金，并要求以加密货币形式支付。 ✅订阅频道：@ipnxz 🛎爆料投稿：@nanxi
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @ipnxz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 245,442 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“南希全球🌍新闻” (@ipnxz), 33,967 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ipnxz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.