3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 692–693 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 17:36
692
-1
7 Sept 2026, 09:23
693
no change
6 Sept 2026, 22:47
693
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
159.0%
avg views ÷ 692 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,100
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.273%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held
20 (6 January 2026 – 26 August 2026)
Views total
1,100
Reactions total
3
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Sept 2026, 09:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
180 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
127
70.6%
❤
47
26.1%
👎
3
1.67%
👌
1
0.556%
👏
1
0.556%
😱
1
0.556%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 180 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/Dcfow83IUuW/?igsi=Y2Z6ZTlqaXhvdmU5
کانال کارکنان قراردادی شرکت نفت فلات قاره را در واتساپ دنبال کنید: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb1qixY8KMqkCNLgqf3B
.
با افتخار در کنار پیج کارکنان قراردادی فلات قاره🤝🏻
به پاس قدردانی از زحمات، تلاشها و همراهی ارزشمند کارکنان پرتلاش شرکت نفت فلات قاره،مناطق نفت خیز جنوب و شرکت ملی حفاری وبا همکاری پیج کارکنان قراردادی فلات قاره، ۲۰٪ تخفیف ویژ…
🔥 وا مصیبتا برای کارکنان صنعت نفت!
فیشهای حقوقی آمدند و چیزی که بیشتر از همه به چشم میخورد، کسورات سنگین مالیاتی است؛ آنهم در شرایطی که هنوز خیلی از کارکنان دقیقاً نمیدانند این مبالغ بر چه اساسی و با چه محاسبهای از حقوقشان کم شده است!
❓ سؤال ما روشن است: چرا؟
چرا باید کارمند و کارگر نفتی که در گرمای طاقتفرسای جنوب، روی سکو، پالایشگاه، مناطق عملیاتی و دور از خانواده کار میکند، با همان معیار کارمند پشتمیزنشی…
https://www.instagram.com/reel/Dcatj4UIXYk/?igsi=YzBobWF0NWdkNXI0
کانال کارکنان قراردادی شرکت نفت فلات قاره را در واتساپ دنبال کنید: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb1qixY8KMqkCNLgqf3B
🚨🔥 یکبار برای همیشه شفاف بگیم! 🔥🚨
افکار نفت کم بود، حالا «نفتزده» هم اضافه شد به پروژهی تخریب کارکنان قراردادی! 😏🎯
اگر مشکلی با سقف حقوق دارید، حلش کنید؛ اما 👇
❌ مشکل سقف حقوق شما هیچ ربطی به کارکنان قراردادی ندارد!
رسانهای کردن حقوق و مزایای یک کارمند قراردادی و انداختنش وسط دعواهای حقوقی، اسمش مطالبهگری نیست! ⚠️
این کار فقط میشه خوراک دادن به حاشیهها و ایجاد دوگانه بین کارکنان نفت! 🛢️💥
کارکنان قراردادی سا…
🚨 دستگل جدید مدیرعامل مجتمع گاز پارس جنوبی!
اینبار پای معیشت و درمان حدود ۵۰۰ نفر از پرسنل قرارداد مستقیم/معین و خانوادههایشان در میان است!
پس از ارسال نامهای که از سوی نیروهای تابع قانون کار تبعیضآمیز تلقی شده، حالا گفته میشود در اقدامی عجیب و هماهنگ با امور مالی، پرداخت حق بیمه خردادماه این نیروها انجام نشده؛ نتیجه؟ حدود ۵۰۰ نفر و خانوادههایشان با مشکل در استفاده از خدمات درمانی تأمین اجتماعی مواجه شدهاند…
🔥 ۵ ماه از سال جدید گذشت؛ پول مرخصی کارکنان قراردادی کجاست؟!
تقریباً ۵ ماه از شروع سال جدید گذشته، اما هنوز مطالبات مربوط به مرخصی کارکنان قراردادی شرکت نفت پرداخت نشده است!
❓ سؤال روشن و ساده است: علت این تأخیر چیست؟
کارکنان قراردادی که ماهها در شرایط سخت و بهصورت اقماری، دور از خانواده و در گرما و دریا مشغول به کار هستند، چرا باید برای دریافت حق و حقوق خودشان ماهها منتظر بمانند؟
اگر پرداخت این مطالبات طبق رو…
🔥 هنوز هیچ چیز قطعی نشده، اما بعضی صفحات از همین حالا شروع به سمپاشی علیه کارکنان نفت کردهاند.
❓سؤال اینجاست:
چرا هر وقت صحبت از بهبود حداقل بخشی از رفاه کارکنان عملیاتی نفت میشود، عدهای تحملش را ندارند؟
🛢 کارکنان نفت، مخصوصاً نیروهای اقماری:
👨👩👧👦 روزهای طولانی دور از خانواده هستند.
🚌 ساعتها در جادههای پرخطر رفتوآمد میکنند.
☀️ در گرمای شدید و شرایط سخت کار میکنند.
⚠️ هر روز با خطرات شغلی و مسئولیتهای س…
سرکار خانم خزائی و مدیرعامل محترم شرکت ملی نفت ایران
با سلام و احترام
کارکنان قراردادی مدت موقت، بهویژه نیروهای عملیاتی، همواره در سختترین شرایط در کنار صنعت نفت ایستادهاند و در روزهای دشوار، از جمله دوران جنگ و بحران، اجازه ندادند حتی لحظهای چرخه تولید متوقف شود.
انتظار ما این بود که وعده همسانسازی فرمول اضافهکاری کارکنان قراردادی مدت موقت با کارکنان مدت معین، پس از مدتها پیگیری، محقق شود تا بخشی از تفاوت…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iooc_gharardadi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
افکار نفت @Afkarnaft · 30,868 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کارکنان قراردادی شرکت نفت فلات قاره” (@iooc_gharardadi), 692 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iooc_gharardadi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.