Channel
@iononta
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
50subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004434951041 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iononta |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iononta |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:29 | 50 | +2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 48 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (31 July 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,376 |
| Reactions total | 35 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
35 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 57.1% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 31.4% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 11.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Astăzi, la ora 06:35, a expirat măsura preventivă a arestului la domiciliu aplicată în privința mea. Procurorul nu a solicitat prelungirea acesteia, iar acum am venit să predau brățara de monitorizare electronică. Am purtat-o o lună. Astăzi o las aici, poate va mai fi utilă. Inclusiv domnului Arcadie Catlabuga, în cel mai bun caz pentru dumnealui, dacă faptele pe care le-am sesizat organelor competente se vor confi…
❤9👍1
Există o întrebare simplă la care consider că instituțiile competente trebuie să ofere un răspuns la fel de simplu: Poate un funcționar public să utilizeze adresa electronică de serviciu și semnătura electronică aferentă activității sale profesionale pentru a transmite și semna acte ce țin exclusiv de interesele sale personale? În cazul meu, o cerere prealabilă formulată de dl Arcadie Catlabuga în nume propriu, pen…
🔥4
Astăzi, la Procuratura Anticorupție. Am dat curs citației și am prezentat poziția mea în cadrul procedurilor legale. Am încredere că adevărul trebuie stabilit prin probe și printr-o anchetă obiectivă, nu prin declarații publice.
❤4
Astăzi am depus o cerere prealabilă la Inspectoratul General al Poliției în legătură cu comunicatul publicat de IGP la data de 01 august 2026 pe paginile oficiale ale instituției, intitulat “ Poliția națională condamnă încercările unor persoane cu statut de învinuit de a influența ancheta în dosarul privind înșelarea a două persoane cu 155.000 euro“. Consider că informațiile și formulările utilizate în acel comunica…
👍3
După dezvăluirile mele, la INI s-a trecut la mobilizare maximă. Arcadie Catlabuga, aflat în culmea disperării, a început personal să-mi abordeze colegii și partenerii de afaceri, încercând să-i intimideze și rugându-i insistent ca măcar cineva să mai depună o declarație împotriva mea. Toate aceste acțiuni și circumstanțe sunt documentate, iar la momentul potrivit vor fi făcute publice.
👍7
Mișcarea Alternativă Națională semnalează o situație de o gravitate extremă, care nu poate fi ignorată și care ridică semne serioase de întrebare asupra funcționării statului de drept în Republica Moldova. Astăzi, colegul nostru, Ion Onța, a făcut public un material audio în care este amenințat cu moartea de către finul șefului Inspectoratului Național de Investigații. Anterior, Ion Onța a declarat că ar fi avut o …
Gaik Vartanean solicită o anchetă privind acuzațiile făcute de consilierul municipal Ion Onța și cere reacția conducerii MAI Deputatul MAN Gaik Vartanean a cerut autorităților să investigheze acuzațiile făcute de consilierul municipal și omul de afaceri Ion Onța, care susține că ar fi fost amenințat de o persoană despre care afirmă că este finul șefului Inspectoratului Național de Investigații, Ion Catlabuga. Potri…
Deputata MAN, Olga Ursu, cere intervenția Procuraturii Generale după ce un coleg de partid a fost amenințat cu moartea Deputata Mișcării Alternativa Națională (MAN), Olga Ursu, a lansat acuzații grave la adresa conducerii Inspectoratului Național de Investigații (INI), acuzând șeful instituției de acțiuni de intimidare, presiuni și reglări de conturi specifice anilor '90. Reacția vine după ce colegul său, Ion Onța, …
❤1
Consilierii MAN condamnă ferm intimidările, șantajul și amenințarea cu moartea la adresa colegului Ion Onta Consilierii Fracțiunii MAN din Consiliul Municipal Chișinău au ieșit cu o poziție publică în urma înregistrării audio făcute publice de consilierul municipal Ion Onta, în care acesta afirmă că a fost intimidat și amenințat cu moartea de finul de cununie al șefului Autorității Naționale de Integritate (ANI). Î…
❤3
Frumos! https://t.me/realitateamd/116537
❤3
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @iononta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 990,878 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ion Onța - consilier municipal” (@iononta), 50 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iononta.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.