Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ϊ.ഠn𝗲 𝑃riᥒᥴᥱss

@ionecover

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

417subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003899655720
TypeChannel
Username@ionecover
CreatedBetween 1 March 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ionecover

Growth

4177 Aug 2026, 03:16 — 417 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 10:50 — 417 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 03:167 Aug 2026, 10:50
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 416–418 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 10:50417no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:16417first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
171.8%
avg views ÷ 417 subscribers
Avg views / post
716
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held18 (29 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total12,177
Reactions total856
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

856 reactions across 11 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 521317584297212556313816.1%
custom 543849876085226265510211.9%
custom 5269724563507280454849.81%
custom 5454336053324299862849.81%
custom 5197455618423689762728.41%
custom 5346227057854534929647.48%
custom 5212950730851243731637.36%
custom 5345817266434889323404.67%
custom 5269632067091596237333.86%
custom 5454232969814238500313.62%
custom 5201717407097313264242.80%
custom 5408994070695541699242.80%
custom 5411377678760572909222.57%
custom 5470155302638756504171.99%
custom 5467696601365513672121.40%
custom 5411462933861401556111.29%
custom 5438361970438850990101.17%
custom 546987247474734388291.05%
custom 543835929896919418580.935%
custom 605108681095460345980.935%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 856reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ionecover. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC143 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🤩Кто больше всех похож на вас внешне? (пишите в комм)

custom 52697245635072804546custom 52017174070973132643

6 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC192 views60 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

˖ 🪦 ࣪⟡ 𝐈.𝗼̴n𝝴 🌊 α𝖻۪ᦅυt υꜱׅ. 🌸 ⊹🪦 ࣪ ყɛαჩֹ, 𝗜’ꭑ 𝗹𝘂ֹ𝗰ׁ𝗸ֹყ 𝗴𝝸๋𝗿𝗹 🐚 ➿ ᥴɦibi κуκ᧘ы учᥲᥴᴛнᥙц ᥲиуᥲн 🎀 ➿➖➿🎀🎀🎀➿➖➿ 🎀 ᦅჩ, 𝗇ֹꪱcֹᧉ ƚᦅ sᧉᧉ ɥα .ᐟ  𖥔 🪦𓂃 L𐑦Ꙇყ 🥹ᎷᧉІІоᑯყ 🌊 ๋ ༢ ⊹ 🎀 𝗔ɡαtɬα • 🥹 は🥹 𝝟ᨷ𝗄ֹᨷ 🌟,🪦๑   바꿔 αttіt𝗎𝗱ɘ 〈‘ 𝘁࡙𝗎𝗱𝝴 〉

custom 526972456350728045416custom 541137767876057290911custom 521317584297212556310custom 52017174070973132645custom 51974556184236897624custom 52129507308512437314custom 53458172664348893234custom 54384987608522626554

2 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC427 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

˖ 🪦 ࣪⟡ 𝐈.𝗼̴n𝝴 🌊. ᥙᴛ᧐ᴦᥙ ᤋᥲ ᥙю᧘ь 🌸 ⊹ ⬜️🎀 ➿➖➿🎀🎀🎀➿➖➿ 🎀

custom 545433605332429986213custom 534622705785453492912custom 521317584297212556311custom 526972456350728045410custom 54113776787605729092custom 52017174070973132641custom 54676966013655136721

2 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC433 views135 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
File

˖ ⟡ 𝐈.𝗼̴n𝝴 🌊 . ρrᥲᥴᴛiᥴᥱ 🌸 ⊹ ׁׅ ყɛαჩֹ, 𝗜’ꭑ 𝗹𝘂ֹ𝗰ׁ𝗸ֹყ 𝗴𝝸๋𝗿𝗹 ׁׅ 🐚🎀ഠn𝗲 - ᥒ𝗲̤ᥕ 𝗽̤𝗿̤ᥲ𝗰̤ᴛ𝗶̤ᥴᥱ 𝗯̤𝘆̤ 𝑨gᥲᴛᴛᥲ ➖ 🎀 ➿➖➿🎀🎀🎀➿➖➿ 🎀 ᦅჩ, 𝗇ֹꪱcֹᧉ ƚᦅ sᧉᧉ ɥα .ᐟ 𖥔🪦𓂃 🤩𝑜𝑛𝑔 :: 𝑻ɦᥱ δ᧐ys 🌊 ๋ ༢   바꿔 αttіt𝗎𝗱ɘ 〈‘ 𝘁࡙𝗎𝗱𝝴 〉

custom 526972456350728045432custom 521295073085124373127custom 521317584297212556325custom 546769660136551367210custom 54113776787605729099custom 51974556184236897628custom 54114629338614015568custom 54384987608522626558

1 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC413 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

δ᧘ᥲᴦ᧐дᥲρᥙⲙ Eᥒᥴɦ᧐𐍃ᴛrᥱᥲⲙ ᤋᥲ ᥰρᥙᴦ᧘ᥲɯᥱнᥙᥱ . Рᥲдᥙ᧐ ᥰ᧐᧘учᥙ᧘᧐ᥴь ᧐чᥱнь ᥙнᴛᥱρᥱᥴныⲙ , ᥙ ᧐чᥱнь нᥲдᥱᥱⲙᥴя чᴛ᧐ ᥙ ʙᥲⲙ ᤋᥲᥔдᥱᴛ )) 💕 ⬜️- давайте поддержим радио и оставим там много коммов и реакции ))⚙️

custom 53462270578545349297custom 54384987608522626556custom 52131758429721255635custom 54114629338614015563custom 52017174070973132642custom 52696320670915962372custom 52129507308512437311custom 52697245635072804541

31 Jul 2026, 14:30 UTC≈4,270 views134 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

˖ ⟡ 𝐈.𝗼̴n𝝴 🌊 Au⃨𝗱it⃨i𝗼ᥒ . 🌸 𝖸𝘂n⃨𝗮𝗁 ⊹ ׁׅ ყɛαჩֹ, 𝗜’ꭑ 𝗹𝘂ֹ𝗰ׁ𝗸ֹყ 𝗴𝝸๋𝗿𝗹 ׁׅ 🐚🎀𝚃𝗮⃨𝚔e⃨𝗻 ‘ 𝗼ᴛ𝟒 ◌ 𝖿𝗿𝖾e⃨ 𝖸𝘂n⃨𝗮𝗁➖ 🎀 ➿➖➿🎀🎀🎀➿➖➿ 🎀 ᦅჩ, 𝗇ֹꪱcֹᧉ ƚᦅ sᧉᧉ ɥα .ᐟ 𖥔🪦𓂃 𝖻𝗼𝘁⃨ 🌊 ๋ ༢ ʀᥙⳑᥱs 🤩➖ ⬜️⊹ 🎀 Qυⲉsⲧⲓⲟⲛⲛᥲⲓʀᥱ 🌟,🪦๑   바꿔 αttіt𝗎𝗱ɘ 〈‘ 𝘁࡙𝗎𝗱𝝴 〉

custom 534581726643488932334custom 543849876085226265522custom 519745561842368976218custom 521295073085124373111custom 521317584297212556310custom 526972456350728045410custom 534622705785453492910custom 545433605332429986210

31 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC518 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52131758429721255633custom 54542329698142385002custom 54543360533242998622custom 52129507308512437311custom 52697245635072804541

31 Jul 2026, 11:01 UTC517 views66 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Айоны всем привет . Хотели бы попросить что бы не верили что мы реально накрутили голоса . Левый человек написала не с офф акка , а с бота что мы якобы накручиваем голоса . Хотя мне кажется всем понятно что 140 голосов вполне нормально для 400 подписчиков. И с учетом того что мы несколько раз писали в этот канал ( вчерашнее соо этому доказательство) Вᥴᥱ дᥱʙ᧐чκᥙ ᤋнᥲю ᥰρᥲʙᥙ᧘ᥲ ɯ᧐у ᥙ нᥱ ʙ κ᧐ᥱⲙ ᥴ᧘учᥲᥱ нᥱ ᥴᴛᥲ᧘ᥙ δы нᥲκρучᥙʙ

custom 534622705785453492920custom 521317584297212556315custom 519745561842368976213custom 52697245635072804546custom 54543360533242998624custom 52129507308512437313custom 54542329698142385003custom 53458172664348893232

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ionecover. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 57,475 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

𝗨n𝗰h𝗮i𝗻
@unchain_oi · 83
2 posts
𝗯lu𝗲 f𝗿am𝗲 #aud
@BlueFramecv · 99
1 post
𖥔 𝑪rυׁׅst 🧁 Jᨵׁׅׅu𝗿s ݁ ༘⋆
@crust_jour · 43
1 post
𝐀𝔘𝔇 | 𝐃enpä
@denpa_gg · 54
1 post
可 ./ 𝐄𝗇𝖼𝗁𝗈𝐒𝗍𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗆 .
@Enchostream · 311
1 post
ㅤㅤEulenlıcht, ۶ৎ
@eulenport · 327
1 post
𝔽𝐴𝗧𝔄𝙇 𝑩ℐ𝘛🅔
@fatalbitebg · 92
1 post
𝐺𝔩𝔦𝔪𝗆𝖾𝗋 #𝔢𝔞𝔰𝛾ᵉʳᵃ РЕСТ
@glimmerstudi · 15
1 post
ׄ ೀ۫ᧁꪮׅᨢ꯭ιıꪀׅ ׄ ۪݃ 🏖 #᥉ׄùოოꫀr
@goblin_cvg · 38
1 post
AUD 𝓗ᧉ‌αɾtׁׅɓᧉɑׁׅȶ ɓɑׁׅᥒძ
@heartbeat_oi · 24
1 post
𝙃𝙖𝙩𝙤𝙧 | 𝙨𝙤𝙡𝙤🪷
@hhhator · 32
1 post
KᕼᗩᑎᑎI 🌸
@khanni_cover · 12
1 post
KA𝗥𝗜𝗡𝗔 ᵇˡᵒᵍ [ 1001% pickme ] 🩷
@krin_blogg · 31
1 post
LÍNAJI
@linaji · 335
1 post
@ * 𝖫𝖨𝖲𝖠𝖭𝖨 ‘ solo
@lisanicover · 63
1 post
𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐌𝐈 𝐆𝐑𝐎𝐔𝐏
@lismi_oi · 114
1 post
ㅤ࣪ .💭 𝐋istᧉd 脐 ’ 𝟬𝟴
@listed_oi · 145
1 post
The end..? 𝑀𝒜𝒴𝐿𝐼𝒩 ``•ˢᵒˡᵒ
@Maylinhey_oi · 31
1 post
№¹ ꭑ𝝸๋ყn𝗻𝝸๋ (ɛ𝗱۪𝝸๋t᪁𝗿 ;👛
@miynniedit · 43
1 post
[ 𝖬𝖺𝗂𝗇 * - 매인] "
@oi_main · 30
1 post
GALA *𝕆rᧉ𐐫. ۫𝕋rυᧉ I甜dℓᧉ . ۫
@oreo_o1 · 161
1 post
НАБОР 뉴진스₊ 𝓢αkαi : . ׄ ·
@sakaicvr · 83
1 post
РЕСТ 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘄𝗯𝗲𝗿𝗿𝘆 𝗿𝘂𝘀𝗵
@StrawberryRush01 · 37
1 post
ПЕРЕЕЗД𓈒۫ 🥥 ࣪ ˖ყoɯe › թrꭷds · ׂ
@y0weprods · 237
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ϊ.ഠn𝗲 𝑃riᥒᥴᥱss” (@ionecover), 417 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ionecover.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.