🎉
❤31❤🔥4🎉1

Channel
@ioffe_smus
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
361subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001577175529 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ioffe_smus |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ioffe_smus |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:21 | 361 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 361 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 15 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
204 reactions across 14 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 84 | 41.2% | |
| 🔥 | 42 | 20.6% | |
| 🎉 | 30 | 14.7% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 6.86% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 5.88% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 3.43% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 1.96% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.47% | |
| 😎 | 3 | 1.47% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 0.49% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.49% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.49% | |
| 🤷♀ | 1 | 0.49% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.49% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 204reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎉
❤31❤🔥4🎉1
🎉 Поздравляем с присуждением медали РАН для молодых учёных! #Виват@ioffe_smus 30 июня 2026 года по итогам конкурса 2025 года присуждены медали Российской академии наук с премиями для молодых ученых. Одним из лауреатов стала наша коллега - Еникеева Мария Олеговна (к.х.н., м.н.с. лаб. Новых неорганических материалов). Премией отмечена работа «Механизмы формирования в условиях методов “мягкой химии” наночастиц, их стру…
❤27🔥6😎3
Наука и материнство — вместе возможно! ❤️🔬 23 мая у нашего лауреата премии КОЛБА - Тепловой Натальи произошло самое большое счастье — родилась долгожданная пятая дочь! "И хотя этот период наполнен заботой о малыше, жизнь в науке продолжается. Я продолжаю активно работать над проектами по грантам и государственным заданиям. В середине июня успешно защитились два моих студента — бакалавр и магистр по направлению «Физ…
🥰9👍4🔥2👏1😁1
🥳 Радостные новости от нашей коллеги, которая была удостоена премии "КОЛБА". #НеТолькоРабота@ioffe_smus
❤4
🥁 Итоги конкурсов РНФ #Виват Российский научный фонд подвёл долгожданные итоги молодёжных конкурсов (1, 2). Чествуем коллег! 💡Проведение инициативных исследований молодыми учёными: - Ненашев ГВ - Поверхностная функционализация детонационных наноалмазов для повышения стабильности и фотоэлектрических свойств плёнок металлорганических перовскитов - Елисеев ИА - Исследование структурных и электронных характеристик In2S…
🔥22👍5
📝 Отбор идей и проектов по электронике для питчинга в ФПИ #Поддержка Фонд перспективных исследований (ФПИ) запускает отбор разработок, идей и проектов в области перспективной электроники. Победители отбора получат консультации по подготовке материалов и докладов, представлению идей для запуска НИР и ОКР, а также по подготовке заявок для получения мер поддержки Фонда. Направления: • Оптоэлектроника; • Силовая электр…
👍1🔥1
🔥 Наши коллеги - в СМУ РАН! #Виват Коллеги, с радостью сообщаем, что Котова Любовь Викторовна (с.н.с., к.ф.-м.н., председатель СМУС ФТИ им. А.Ф. Иоффе и СМУ СПбО РАН) также возглавила Совет молодых учёных Российской академии наук! 🗣 Слово героине: "Уважаемые коллеги! Для меня это большая честь и одновременно серьёзная ответственность — присоединиться к работе в таком формате и с таким уровнем доверия. Искренне бл…
🎉14💯3🥰3❤2👏1🔥1
Источник и фотография: СПбО РАН.
❤12🔥3💅1🤗1🥴1
🧐 Опрос Минобра об общественных объединениях #Насущное Коллеги, Минобрнауки проводит опрос об... общественных объединениях. Вот Вы знаете что такое "общественные объединения"? А зачем они? А должны ли они получать деньги от государства? А должно ли государство влиять на их работу? Массовые ответы на эти и подобные вопросы, вероятно, могут оказаться полезны для формирования адекватной обратной связи о действующих об…
❤2🔥1🤷♀1
🎉
🎉15👏2
🏆О победителях Конкурса работ молодых учёных ФТИ #Виват 15 мая прошёл традиционный Конкурс работ молодых учёных ФТИ им. А.Ф. Иоффе. В Конкурсе могли принимать участие циклы работ молодых учёных ФТИ без учёной степени. А в минувшую пятницу на Учёном совете награда официально нашла своих героев. Зафиксируем и мы имена победителей! 🥇Кузикова Анна Васильевна (лаб. физики ферроиков, ОФТТ) "Лазерно-индуцированные фазовые…
❤6👏3
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ioffe_smus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 786,343 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Информер СМУС ФТИ им. А.Ф. Иоффе” (@ioffe_smus), 361 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ioffe_smus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.