Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for В мыслях Натаниэля

Channel

В мыслях Натаниэля

@inwardel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

160subscribers

+38 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003982791656
TypeChannel
Username@inwardel
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/inwardel

Growth

1221601417 August 2026 — 122 subscribers7 August 2026 — 123 subscribers9 August 2026 — 123 subscribers14 August 2026 — 160 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 116–166 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:56160+37
9 Aug 2026, 03:17123no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:37123+1
7 Aug 2026, 06:01122first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
71.0%
avg views ÷ 160 subscribers
Avg views / post
114
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held13 (2 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,477
Reactions total232
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 03:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

232 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53754631063968556046427.6%
custom 53752766360967343145322.8%
custom 53732476076467572144519.4%
custom 53751100472002252474218.1%
custom 537516785316506294293.88%
custom 537541444871235958693.88%
custom 537516019953333780583.45%
custom 524910196879789902420.862%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 232reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC46 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Завтра в 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤успей насладиться бесплатными выборами за 🔤🔤 часа!

custom 53732476076467572147custom 53754631063968556044custom 53752766360967343143custom 53751100472002252471

8 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC58 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤Утро начинается с кофе. 🤩Поддержать канал 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤#ВМысляхНатаниэля #НатаниэльГовард #иифото 🌸В Мыслях Натаниэля

custom 537546310639685560411custom 53751100472002252474custom 53752766360967343142custom 53732476076467572141custom 53751678531650629421

7 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC63 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤Насколько далеко может зайти их интервью? 🤩Поддержать канал 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤#ВМысляхНатаниэля #НатаниэльНадин #НатаниэльГовард #обработка 🌸В Мыслях Натаниэля

custom 53752766360967343148custom 53732476076467572144custom 53751100472002252474custom 53754144487123595861custom 53754631063968556041

6 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC388 views38 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 537527663609673431419custom 53754631063968556049custom 53732476076467572148custom 53751100472002252471custom 53754144487123595861

6 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC99 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤Утро в спортзале. Натаниэль не упускает шанса показаться вам во всей красе. 🤩Поддержать канал 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤#ВМысляхНатаниэля #НатаниэльГовард #иифото 🌸В Мыслях Натаниэля

custom 537511004720022524713custom 53754631063968556042custom 53732476076467572141custom 53752766360967343141

5 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC94 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤Выдержали бы его взгляд? 🤩Поддержать канал 🔤автор – 🔤cheskalromanc 🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤#ВМысляхНатаниэля #НатаниэльГовард #НатаниэльНадин #видео 🌸В Мыслях Натаниэля

custom 53732476076467572147custom 53751100472002252475custom 53752766360967343141custom 53754144487123595861custom 53754631063968556041

5 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC89 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 53754631063968556047custom 53752766360967343142custom 52491019687978990241custom 53732476076467572141custom 53751100472002252471custom 53751678531650629421

5 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC90 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 53754631063968556045custom 53751678531650629424custom 52491019687978990241custom 53732476076467572141custom 53751100472002252471custom 53752766360967343141custom 53754144487123595861

5 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC83 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤Как проходят ваши последние тёплые дни? 🤩Поддержать канал 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤#ВМысляхНатаниэля #НатаниэльГовард #обработка 🌸В Мыслях Натаниэля

custom 53751601995333378058custom 53752766360967343142custom 53754631063968556042custom 53732476076467572141custom 53751100472002252471

4 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC95 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤Тишина парижских улиц. 🤩Поддержать канал 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤#ВМысляхНатаниэля #НатаниэльГовард #обработка 🌸В Мыслях Натаниэля

custom 537546310639685560412custom 53751100472002252472custom 53732476076467572141custom 53751678531650629421custom 53752766360967343141

3 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC111 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤Заигрывают к друг другу. 🤩Поддержать канал 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤#ВМысляхНатаниэля #НатаниэльНадин #НатаниэльГовард #хедканон 🌸В Мыслях Натаниэля

custom 537527663609673431410custom 53754144487123595863custom 53754631063968556043custom 53732476076467572141custom 53751100472002252471

3 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC127 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤Красив при свете дня. 🤩Поддержать канал 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤#ВМысляхНатаниэля #НатаниэльГовард #обработка 🌸В Мыслях Натаниэля

custom 53754631063968556046custom 53751100472002252473custom 53732476076467572141custom 53751678531650629421custom 53752766360967343141custom 53754144487123595861

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @inwardel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 209,981 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“В мыслях Натаниэля” (@inwardel), 160 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inwardel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.