Channel
@invasion_protocol
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
485subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002829504534 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @invasion_protocol |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 21 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/invasion_protocol |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 485 | -5 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 16:15 | 490 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 491 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:53 | 494 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 497 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
38 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 44.7% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 34.2% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 21.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 20 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
How to avoid burnout in strategy games: tips for your sessions Real-time strategies don't forgive distraction. Every second demands focus, every decision carries weight. But that very intensity can become a path to burnout. How do you play a lot without burning out? In RTS games, your brain runs in constant analysis mode: economy, micro, map awareness, timing. Without pauses and without room to breathe, fatigue bui…
Resources in Invasion Protocol: why they're scarce and why you fight for them In classic strategy games, resources often become background noise: gather, build, attack. In Invasion Protocol, we removed the "background." Resources here aren't just fuel for a production queue—they're a tool of pressure. Their limited supply, uneven distribution, and high cost of loss turn every extraction point into a tactical node. …
Five facts about Invasion Protocol you might have missed Behind every match lies a layer of subtle details that don't shout for attention—but directly shape your decisions. Here are five understated yet crucial aspects of the game. Asymmetry is built into the logic, not just the visuals. The factions differ in economy, deployment speed, and win conditions. Humans win through control and adaptation; UFOs through pr…
Hey, guys! We continue to tell you about the news from the gaming industry. Pale Tide, a survival action game about zombies, a dog, and an underground bunker, has been announced The Belgian studio Aberratic Announced Pale Tide, a single action action game about survival in a zombie—infested world. The developers have not yet revealed the release date. The events unfold after a mysterious epidemic that has turned …
❤1
Your Voice Matters: Feedback in Invasion Protocol A key question for any tester: "Will they actually listen to me?" In Invasion Protocol, early access is a dialogue with the community — not just a way to raise funds. Your balance reports ("artillery is too strong," "aliens are weak in close combat") will be analyzed and factored into future patches. A voting system for key changes is planned: which units need adjus…
👍2
New here? A quick guide to Invasion Protocol We see our community growing, and we're glad to have you. If you've just joined us — here's a brief overview of what this is all about. Invasion Protocol sis a next-gen RTS where the global standoff between NATO and Russia is interrupted by an invasion from deep space. Three factions, three philosophies of war, one world at stake. Each faction features a unique tactical…
If aliens land tomorrow, what's the first thing you'd offer then?
The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Two colors, one atmosphere. Why Invasion Protocol is black and blue? You've probably noticed: the interfaces, environments, and promotional materials for Invasion Protocol are built around a strict, minimalist palette. Black and blue. No visual noise, no random accents. This isn't a trend-driven choice, it's a deliberate decision shaped by gameplay, psychology, and the core identity of the project. Black in our gam…
❤2
New here? A quick guide to Invasion Protocol We see our community growing, and we're glad to have you. If you've just joined us — here's a brief overview of what this is all about. Invasion Protocol is a next-gen RTS where the global standoff between NATO and Russia is interrupted by an invasion from deep space. Three factions, three philosophies of war, one world at stake. Each faction features a unique tactical …
❤1
Your Voice Matters: Feedback in Invasion Protocol A key question for any tester: "Will they actually listen to me?" In Invasion Protocol, early access is a dialogue with the community, not just a way to raise funds. Your balance reports ("artillery is too strong," "aliens are weak in close combat") will be analyzed and factored into future patches. A voting system for key changes is planned: which units need adjustm…
❤1🔥1
The Atmosphere of Total War: How Invasion Protocol Immerses You in the Chaos of Battle Invasion Protocol isn't just about visuals, it's about feeling. The developers focus on meticulous detail that makes you truly sense the scale and tension of a global conflict. Each faction has a distinct, recognizable aesthetic: NATO features clean geometric shapes, high-tech materials, and a blue-grey palette; Russia brings mas…
🔥2
Three Philosophies of War in Invasion Protocol In Invasion Protocol, it’s not just armies that will clash, but three fundamentally different approaches to victory. NATO is built on precision, technology, and battlefield control. High-cost, high-impact units prioritize reconnaissance, drones and air superiority. Russia stands for mass, resilience, and overwhelming artillery. Easily produced units, heavy armor, and …
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @invasion_protocol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
If aliens land tomorrow, what's the first thing you'd offer then?
The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
How should the invasion begin?
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 20 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Invasion Protocol: Gamers Community” (@invasion_protocol), 485 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/invasion_protocol.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.