5 measurements spanning 30 days, net +18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 422–446 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 10:58
443
+9
29 Aug 2026, 02:37
434
+6
15 Aug 2026, 16:13
428
+3
8 Aug 2026, 05:20
425
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:22
425
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
29 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
17
58.6%
❤
10
34.5%
☃
1
3.45%
🔥
1
3.45%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Английский рыцарь XIV века: фон.
Наш сющий шаг в работе над проектом - поиск визуальные решений для фотографии.
Мне получилось достать лист XIX века с архетиктурными памятника и Англии. 2 изображения относились к Церви Девы Марии бывшего аббатства Тьюксберри - места погребения баронов Деспенсера. Собственно роспись фигурки я делал по витражу из этой церкви. Сейчас пробные фотографии. Потом буду сканировать, наносит…
Итог опроса по написанию
Очень признателен всем, кто проголосовал в опросе и участвовал в обсуждении в других пабликах.
Подведём итоги)
В вопросе, который я вчера задал, есть подвох - многозначность, характерная для средневековой книжности.
Неожиданно, есть сразу два правильных ответа, которые конфликтуют между собой.
1) В тексте написано служебное слово nam. Оно использовалась как наречие "действительно", "поис…
"Смеховый мир" Древней Руси
Готовил популярную статью про юмор разных исторических эпох и заглянул в небольшую книжку Д. С. Лихачева и А. М. Панченко - были у меня на неё большие надежды. Оправдались они только отчасти.
Впечатления:
1. Перед нами очень неплохой филологический анализ (темы, выразительные средства и т.п.), но читать его нужно заглядывая в тексты о которых идёт речь. Без них ценность "Смехового мира"…
❓ВОПРОС: какое слово попало в рамку?
Уважаемые друзья, предлагаю почувствовать себя немного палеографом.
Перед нами книга-палеотип.
Издана в 1502 году.
Язык - латинский.
Шрифт -готический.
Нужно прочитать слово, попавшее в рамку. По середине - гласная "a". По краям - две согласные.
Чтобы немного упростить задачу внизу красным я дал готические написания двух популярных согласных.
Завтра вечером подведём итоги)
#опр…
"Ивэйн" из замка Роденегг (цикл фресок)
Замок Роденегг (нем. Schloss Rodenegg, ит. - Castello di Rodengo) средневековая оборонительная постройка недалеко от города Бриксен (нем. - Brixen), центра одноименного диоцеза и духовного княжества. Сейчас - город Брессаноне (ит. - Bressanone) в Италии.
Замок Роденегг примечателен тем, что в одном из залов сохранился цикл фресок по мотивам рыцарского романа "Ивэйн или рыцар…
❤4👍2
Signed vlricus
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @inumbramallei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“In umbra mallei / Григорий Бакус” (@inumbramallei), 443 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inumbramallei.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
