Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 93 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,028–6,087 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 11:58
6,042
+1
4 Nov 2026, 04:09
6,041
+6
1 Nov 2026, 06:56
6,035
-4
29 Oct 2026, 12:38
6,039
-7
26 Oct 2026, 16:35
6,046
-8
17 Oct 2026, 20:44
6,054
+6
15 Oct 2026, 03:49
6,048
-11
12 Oct 2026, 08:01
6,059
+5
5 Oct 2026, 09:15
6,054
+2
27 Sept 2026, 04:37
6,052
-7
14 Sept 2026, 05:57
6,059
-12
10 Sept 2026, 18:41
6,071
+1
5 Sept 2026, 06:38
6,070
-5
1 Sept 2026, 01:27
6,075
+2
29 Aug 2026, 00:16
6,073
+5
25 Aug 2026, 19:17
6,068
-8
22 Aug 2026, 10:39
6,076
-4
18 Aug 2026, 21:45
6,080
+10
15 Aug 2026, 20:54
6,070
+7
12 Aug 2026, 07:02
6,063
first reading
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.45%
avg views ÷ 6,042 subscribers
Avg views / post
390
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
65 (1 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
8,962
Reactions total
182
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 17:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
35m 56s
Average length
1m 38s
Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
494 reactions across 58 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
420
85.0%
👍
56
11.3%
💔
12
2.43%
👎
6
1.21%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 549 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (8.70%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
با سلام و احترام،
بدینوسیله به استحضار میرساند اینجانب آرمان خزائی، دانشجوی مقطع دکتری ر. بالینی، در نظر دارم دو نفر از دانشجویان فعال و مستعد مقطع کارشناسی ارشد رشته روانشناسی بالینی را برای همکاری بهعنوان دستیار ویژه فعالیتهای آکادمیک جذب نمایم.
این دانشجویان میبایست سابقه فعالیت پژوهشی و آکادمیک در حوزه روانشناسی بالینی داشته باشند و توانایی همکاری در امور زیر را دارند:
· کمک به طراحی و اجرای پروژههای پژو…
چرا زبانِ عشقِ زن و مرد اینقدر با هم فرق دارد؟ (رازِ صمیمیت از نگاه هلن فیشر) 🧩🚻
حتماً توی رابطه دیدهاید: زن گلایه میکند که «تو اصلاً برای من وقت نمیگذاری و حرف نمیزنی!»؛ و مرد متعجب پاسخ میدهد: «پس این همهوقت که کنار هم فیلم میبینیم، بیرون میرویم و کارها را با هم انجام میدهیم چیست؟» چرا هر دو طرف نهایت تلاششان را برای صمیمیت میکنند، اما یکدیگر را نمیفهمند؟
دکتر هلن فیشر پاسخ بسیار زیبایی به این تفاوت م…
🖤 سوگ در کودکان، نوجوانان و بزرگسالان چه تفاوتی دارد؟
آیا کودکی که بعد از فوت عزیزش به بازی برمیگردد، کمتر از یک بزرگسال غمگین است؟ آیا نوجوانی که سکوت میکند و خودش را از دیگران کنار میکشد، واقعاً با فقدان کنار آمده است؟
واقعیت این است که سوگ در همه سنین اتفاق میافتد، اما شکل بروز آن میتواند متفاوت باشد.
🧠 ۱. سوگ در کودکان؛ وقتی احساسات از رفتارها حرف میزنند
کودکان، بهویژه در سنین پایین، هنوز در حال رشد شن…
تغییرِ مسیرِ ذهن از سیاهی به روشنایی (قدرتِ تمرکز بر داشتهها) ✨🧠
شاید با خودت فکر کنی جملههایی مثل «روی نکات مثبت تمرکز کن» دیگر خیلی کلیشهای شدهاند؛ اما علمِ شناخت و عملکرد مغز، حرف دیگری میزند.
از منظر نوروساینس و روانشناسی شناختی:
▫️ توجهِ ما ظرفیتِ محدودی دارد. اگر تمام روزت را صرفِ جستجوی نقصها، مشکلات و بحرانها کنی، شبکهی توجهِ مغزت (RAS) بهگونهای تنظیم میشود که فقط و فقط سیاهیها و رنجها را ببین…
ما هیچوقت اتفاقی عاشق کسی نمیشویم! (رمزگشایی انتخاب پارتنر از نگاه فروید) 🧩❤️
توی یک جمع شلوغ، در میان دهها آدم مختلف، نگاهت ناگهان قفل روی یک نفر میشود. فکر میکنی این یک تصادفِ قشنگ است؟ روانشناسیِ عمیق چیز دیگری میگوید…
از منظر فروید و مکتب روانپویشی:
▫️ ما هرگز اتفاقی عاشق نمیشویم. نگاهِ ما در ناخودآگاه، جذبِ کسی میشود که از قبل نقشهاش در ذهنمان طراحی شده است.
▫️ ترسها، زخمهای التیامنیافتهی کودک…
🖤 سوگ پنهان در کودکان و نوجوانان؛ وقتی انگار هیچ اتفاقی نیفتاده است!
گاهی کودکی عزیزی را از دست میدهد، اما نه گریه میکند، نه دربارهاش حرف میزند و حتی به بازی و فعالیتهای روزمرهاش ادامه میدهد.
آیا یعنی دلتنگ نیست؟ آیا واقعاً با این فقدان کنار آمده است؟
نه لزوماً! سوگ همیشه با گریه و غم آشکار دیده نمیشود.
🧠 سوگ پنهان چیست؟
بعضی کودکان و نوجوانان درد فقدان را به شکلی نشان میدهند که اطرافیان بهسختی متوجه آ…
عاشقِ یک آدمِ ADHD هستی و رفتارهاش گیجت کرده؟! 🌀💔
اگر با یک فرد مبتلا به ADHD (نقص توجه و بیشفعالی) در رابطه عاطفی هستی، حتماً این حالت رو تجربه کردی:
یک روز عاشِقپیشهترین آدم دنیاته و روز بعد، بهشدت در خودش فرو میره و سکوت میکنه! این تناقض ممکنه باعث بشه با خودت فکر کنی: «نکند دوستیاش واقعی نیست؟ نکند دیگر دوستم ندارد؟»
اما حقیقت این است که ADHD فقط به معنی فراموشکاری یا حواسپرتی نیست؛ این اختلال بهشدت ر…
چرا همیشه میترسی پارتنرت ترکت کند؟ 💔⛓️
حتماً برایت پیش آمده که با وجود یک رابطهی خوب، مدام از درون با این وسواس و اضطراب بجنگی که: «نکند یک روز خسته شود و برود؟» هر دوریِ موقت یا دیر جوابدادنِ سادهای در پیامرسانها، طوفانی از ترس و فاجعهسازی را در ذهنت به پا میکند. اما ریشهٔ این درد کجاست؟
در روانشناسی، این حالت تحت عنوان «طرحواره رهاشدگی» بررسی میشود:
▫️ این یک زخمِ کهنه از گذشتههای دور است؛ زمانی که در …
🕊 سوگ در کودکان و نوجوانان | آیا باید کودک را از واقعیت مرگ دور نگه داریم؟
«هنوز بچهست، چیزی از مرگ نمیفهمه!»
«بهتره بهش نگیم پدربزرگش فوت کرده؛ بذار فکر کنه مسافرت رفته.»
«از وقتی مادرش رو از دست داده، دیگه دربارهاش حرف نمیزنه. فکر کنم فراموش کرده!»
اینها بعضی از واکنشهایی هستن که ممکنه والدین و اطرافیان در مواجهه با سوگ کودکان نشون بدن.
اما یک سؤال مهم وجود داره:
🧠 آیا سکوت درباره مرگ، واقعاً از کودک مح…
#گفتگو
+ دلیل اینکه نمیتونیم آدمی که قبلا باهاش رابطه داشتیم رو فراموش کنیم چیه با اینکه کاملا مطمئن هستیم اون فرد واقعا دوستمون نداشته.
- با سلام
راستش برای این سوال دلایل زیادی وجود داره اما به چند نکته اشاره کوتاهی میکنم.
شماره ۱؛ اعتیاد به خودزنی. ما از کودکی ممکنه آسیبهای زیادی خورده باشیم و دوست داشته شدن ما در گرو این باشه که باید آسیب ببینیم. از اونجا به بعد وارد روابطی میشیم که همواره طرد میشیم چون …
#گفتگو
+ سلام وقتتون بخیر باشه دکتر
پارتنر من زمینه افسردگی داره و یه مدت قرص استفاده می کرده
با خانواده هم از بچگی رابطه ی درستی
نداشته چون نبودن اکثرا
ما همیشه مشکلاتمونو با گفت و گو حل میکردیم خیلی همو میفهمیم و همه چی اوکی بوده
الان که ما به مشکل نسبتا جدی خوردیم نمیتونیم حلش کنیم چون از موقعی ای که این موضوع پیش اومده خودشو از منو دوستا و خانوادش دور کرده و بزور باهامون حرف میزنه
حتی داشت بهم میگفت که احساس م…
❤7
Signed آرمــان خزائــی
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @intreatmentpsy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
یافتههای نوین روانشناختی @Hrman11 · 24,203 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
هزار و یک پادکست @OneThousandandOnePodcast · 35,690 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
کتابهای روانشناسی و روانپزشکی @psyologistravanbook · 23,230 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
پادکست روانشناسی سايكوپاد @psychopod · 23,343 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 September 2026
نوید نقش آموزش رایگان انگلیسی @ielts9_course · 25,210 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 September 2026
دکتر علی صاحبی @drali_sahebi · 21,966 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 September 2026
علی ميرصادقی @ali_mirsadeghi · 45,524 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
کاپلانخوانی @kaplansadockk · 37,520 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“In Treatment (تحت درمان)” (@intreatmentpsy), 6,042 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/intreatmentpsy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.