Channel
@intoyou_russia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
773subscribers
-39 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002897788561 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @intoyou_russia |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/intoyou_russia |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:58 | 773 | -5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:35 | 778 | -13 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 791 | -5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 796 | -7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 803 | -10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:21 | 813 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 812 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 14 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
91 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 34 | 37.4% | |
| 🍓 | 19 | 20.9% | |
| 🕊 | 13 | 14.3% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 6.59% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 6.59% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 5.49% | |
| 🗿 | 4 | 4.40% | |
| custom 5276044878466284619 | 3 | 3.30% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.10% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 3 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟Lip blush: я почти записалась. Но сомнения победили Полина, креативный продюсер Into You Месяц назад я держала телефон с открытой записью к мастеру и листала рефы часа три. Нашла идеальный оттенок – такой пыльно-розовый, даже чуть ягодный (но при этом естественный). Потом я закрыла вкладку… Потом открыла снова. В итоге заказала в ЗЯ тинт и легла спать. Объясняю логику: Lip blush – это татуаж нового поколения (то…
❤10
🧡🧡Похоже, это лето 🧡🧡мы начинаем 🧡🧡особенно красиво… С 1 июня при любой покупке в магазинах сети Befree и универмагах Trend Island каждая девушка получит в подарок наш абсолютный бестселлер – Watery Lip Matte 💄 внутри вы найдете секретный QR-код с приятным сюрпризом 👀 Важно: — акция действует только в магазинах-участниках — количество подарков ограничено Не забудь проверить, в каких магазинах проходит акция! …
🍓10🕊6💘5🗿4❤1👍1
🤩 Возможно, мы все хоть раз в жизни мечтали, чтобы кто-нибудь создал блеск для губ, который не требуется обновлять чаще, чем пьем кофе (а пьем кофе мы часто...) Но правда в том, что на самом деле это не проблема. Блеск сам по себе не создавался, чтобы быть стойким – он нужен именно для особенного эффекта визуального добавления объема. Этот продукт по своим компонентам и составам не может быть ультрастойким, НО! Ес…
❤5
Video message, posted without a caption
💯6🕊2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4🕊1
На связи маркетинговый отдел INTO YOU 🩵 Офисный воздух не страшен, когда в твоей косметичке есть эти 3 малышки - Средство 3в1 в оттенке 01 - Блеск для губ Frozen glow в оттенке 03 - Тинт для губ One shot в оттенке 01 #iyteam
❤2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥5🕊3🍓2
📷📷📷📷Тренд «blurred lips» — 📷📷📷📷ответ 2026 года на 📷📷📷📷матовую помаду 2016 📷📷📷📷 📷📷📷📷 📷📷📷📷 Очередное переосмысление ностальгии 2k16, в обновленном формате. Последние несколько лет определенно запомнились многим как gloss era (неприличное количество блестящих продуктов для губ в твоей косметичке – тому доказательство). Масла и бальзамы — в каждом углу квартиры и на рабочем столе. И хотя глянцевые губы долго были верн…
❤8
Чувствуется приближение слез… и радости! Так уж вышло, что весенняя пора всегда ассоциируется с переживаниями об образе на выпускной вечер... Что ж, мы тут, чтобы помочь тебе ничего не забыть и собрать свою «спасительную» косметичку! Пусть ни одна слезинка не испортит твой макияж, дорогая 🌟 #howto
🍓4❤3
💞💞💞💞 💞💞💞💞 💞💞💞💞 💞💞💞💞Тренд на румянец в этом сезоне окончательно вышел из-под контроля… Пока Brontë blush (румяна по мотивам Джейн Остин) постепенно теряет свою актуальность, мы все переживаем тотальную blush blindness (не переживайте, что не понимаете, зумеры снова придумали новое название тем, у кого помешательство на румянах) 🤍 Мир бьюти разделился на два лагеря: например, визажисты таких звезд как Зои Кравиц, Гре…
🍓2
Тушь – все? разбираемся в новом TikTok-тренде #fullfacenomascara вместе с командой INTO YOU #iytrends
custom 52760448784662846193❤1🍓1💘1🕊1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @intoyou_russia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“INTO YOU” (@intoyou_russia), 773 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/intoyou_russia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.