Хочу вам оставить ссылку на мой новый канал. Хочу заниматься тем, что мне действительно очень нравится. https://t.me/vsentrezyba

Channel
Интимные Отношения 18+
@intimnietemi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
88subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002253427315 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @intimnietemi |
| Created | Between 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/intimnietemi |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 88 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 90 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 90 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 91 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 50s
- Average length
- 28s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
28 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 10 | 35.7% | |
| 🍌 | 4 | 14.3% | |
| 🍓 | 4 | 14.3% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 10.7% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5310062574228757654 | 2 | 7.14% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 7.14% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2026 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Если бы ваш партнёр сказал, что хочет в себе изменить то что на его взгляд выглядит некрасивым, что бы вы ему ответили? Как вы относитесь к косметологическим изменениям, пластической хирургии? Сейчас вроде бы можно оставлять комментарии не заходя в группу для комментариев. Ставьте реакции на пост⤵️ ⤵️ 👍 - за 👎 - против
👎3👍1
Дамы и господа 🫦 Пристегните ремни 💅 Сейчас нас будет е💚аш❤️ть👸 Во время эрекции губчатые и пещеристые тела в мужском половом органе наполняются кровью, и он увеличивается – это естественный процесс. Вопреки распространенному мнению, утренняя эрекция вовсе не свидетельствует о сексуальном возбуждении мужчины. Она возникает непроизвольно и вызывается внутренними процессами. На половую активность сильно влияет уров…
Напишите мне пожалуйста тему для следующего видео 😁🌈
По этой ссылке можно задать мне анонимный вопрос: 👉 t.me/voprosy?start=pg3yb
Комбинированные оральные контрацептивы (💛❤️💛) — препараты в форме таблеток, которые содержат синтетические аналоги двух гормонов: эстрогена и прогестина. 📍Ещё есть гормональные методы такие как: пластырь, кольцо, имплант под кожу.
Интересное предположение 👆 🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶
Норм или Стрём? 😑
👍1
Парни, вы бы согласились?
- Да50%
- Нет32%
- я девушка18%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Чего уже только не придумают 🤩
🍌1
Знали об этом?
- Да67%
- Нет33%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @intimnietemi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Парни, вы бы согласились?
- Да50%
- Нет32%
- я девушка18%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Знали об этом?
- Да67%
- Нет33%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Вы открытый разговариваете со своим партнёром на тему секса
- Да71%
- Нет17%
- Иногда12%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2026 to 11 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Интимные Отношения 18+” (@intimnietemi), 88 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/intimnietemi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.