Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for في الأعماق 🌿

Channel

في الأعماق 🌿

@inthedeeps

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

53subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001251849317
TypeChannel
Username@inthedeeps
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 20 May 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/inthedeeps

Growth

5355547 August 2026 — 55 subscribers10 August 2026 — 55 subscribers14 August 2026 — 54 subscribers23 August 2026 — 53 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53–55 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 00:4353-1
14 Aug 2026, 15:3554-1
10 Aug 2026, 08:1555no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:3855first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 May 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
224.5%
avg views ÷ 53 subscribers
Avg views / post
119
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (20 May 20216 August 2026)
Views total119
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
685.7%
👍114.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2021 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC119 viewsread 10 August 2026

أأنتِ التي خُيّلَ لي أنَّها مَسكنٌ؟ أم أنَّني كُنتُ في الـوهمِ أبني قِـلاعاً؟ ​أتساءلُ والليلُ يـنهشُ صبري: بـأيِّ وجهٍ نـسيتِ.. جُـرحاً تـمادى اتسـاعاً؟ ​أفتّشُ في ذكرياتِ الـودادِ، فـلا أرى سـوى وعـودٍ.. غَـدت لِـلرياحِ مـتاعاً ​أكانَ وفـاؤكِ حُـلماً مَـضى وانـقضى؟ أم كـانَ قِـناعاً.. يُـواري خِـداعاً؟ ​أستنكرُ مِـنكِ كـيفَ بِـعتِ مَـودتي وكـيفَ صـارَ لـساني.. لِـذكركِ نَـعّاعاً؟ ​صديقةُ دربي.. أم عَـدوّةُ وحـدتي؟

Signed Amira Obeid

20 Dec 2025, 16:49 UTC371 viewsread 10 August 2026

فِي الرُّكنِ من هذا الشهرْ ينسابُ من ليْلي أَثَرْ ويطوفُ وَجْهُكِ في الرؤى كيف استحال إلى صورْ؟ كُنَّا هُنا.. روحينِ في جسدِ المدى نبني من الكَلِماتِ جِسْراً للندى ونسافِرُ.. بين البلادِ، وبين سِحرِ الحِوارِ بِلا جَوازٍ، أو سَفَرْ! يا أنتِ.. يا من بَقيتِ بَعيدةً كالفَجْرِ في أقصى البِلادْ يا طِفلةً وُلِدَت مع الثَّلجِ النَّقيِّ.. ومع العِنادْ هل تَذكُرينَ؟ شِتاءنا، أَحلامَنا، وحَديثنا المَمدودَ.. حتَّى يَنتَهي ضَوءُ

Signed Amira Obeid

1 May 2024, 19:20 UTC≈1,060 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

وبِيْ شَوقٌ إلىٰ عَينَيكِ جِدًّا ‏كشَوقِ الزَّارعِينَ إلىٰ السَّحابِ ‏وشَوقِ الرَّاحلينَ بأرضِ قفرٍ ‏إلىٰ نبعِ الحقيقةِ لا السرابِ ‏وشَوقِ الماكثينَ بقُطبِ أرضٍ ‏إلىٰ شَمسٍ أطالتْ في الغيابِ ‏وشَوقِ التَّائهِ الحَيرانِ طِفلًا ‏إلىٰ أهْلِيهِ أو بعضِ الصِّحابِ .

2

Signed Amira Obeid

1 May 2024, 19:19 UTC≈1,010 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

سَلامٌ على الليلِ لمّا أتى توارَيتُ وحدي وراءَ النجومْ بَعثتُ همومي إلى خالِقي وهل غيرُ ربّي يُزيل الهُمومْ؟

2

Signed Amira Obeid

1 May 2024, 19:19 UTC≈1,030 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

سَلَبَ النومَ خيالٌ مَرَّ بي ‏في فؤادي لحبيبٍ غائبِ ‏فاستثار الطيفُ قلبًا مثقلًا ‏أضرم الحبَّ فأهوى جانبي ‏يا خليلَ الروحِ هلّا زرتَنا ‏في شروقِ الشَّمسِ أو في المغربِ ‏أو فزُرني في منامي عَلَّنا ‏نلتقي لو في زوايا الحُجُبِ .

1

Signed Amira Obeid

28 Oct 2023, 15:36 UTC≈1,540 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

"وما أدراكَ أني لا أحنُّ؟ وأني من لظى شوقي أُجَنُّ؟ وأني ليسَ يُضنيني حنيني وطيفُكَ في خيالي لا يَعِنُّ تمنيتُ اللقاء وكان ظني بأن تأتي الحياةُ بما أظنُّ فخانتني الحياةُ وتاهَ دربي وظلَّ القلبُ في صدري يئنُّ"

1

Signed Amira obeid

30 Apr 2023, 16:31 UTC≈1,270 viewsread 10 August 2026

بعيدٌ أنت أبعدُ ما تكون ‏كشيءٍ لاتُحيطُ به العُيون ‏قريبٌ أنت أقربُ من فؤادي ‏يقينٌ لا تُخالطهُ الظنُون ‏أعيشُ تناقضًا عقلي وقلبي ‏فكيف العيشُ بينهُما يكون ‏فليتكَ رغمَ ما ألقاهُ تدري ‏بأنكَ رغم ذلكَ لا تهُون

Signed Amira obeid

23 Jan 2023, 19:09 UTC≈2,220 viewsread 10 August 2026

إن تسَل.. تجد الجوابَ على فؤادك كالعسل! هذا.. ولكنْ لم تسَلْ.. فلم يسِلْ!

Signed Amira obeid

18 Jan 2023, 09:24 UTC≈2,500 viewsread 10 August 2026

‏و على الذَّين إذا وجدو البديل تبّدلوا ، رفقاً على أنفسكم من مراديد الحياة رفقاً !

Signed Amira obeid

18 Jan 2023, 09:24 UTC≈2,370 viewsread 10 August 2026

هذي الرسائلُ بيننا إنّي مللتُ برودها نفسُ الكلامِ نُعيدهُ ونُعيدُ نفسَ حديثها يا أنتِ صرتِ مُملَّـةً ومُملَّـةً أخبارُها تلكَ الرسائلُ بيننا عنّي نفضتُ غبارَها لا تكتبي .. لا تكتبي إنّي مللتُ برودها ومللتُ قصةَ وهمنَا ونِفَـاقَنَـا .. ونِفَـاقَهـا!

Signed Amira obeid

16 Jan 2023, 21:49 UTC≈2,220 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026

إياكَ أن تُعطي فؤادكَ للذِي ما إن تَغيبُ إلى البَديلِ يميلُ واختَر لقَلبكَ مَا يلِيقُ بصدقِه مَا كُل مَن يأوىَ إليكَ خَليلُ إنَّ المعَادن إنْ صَقلتَ عرفتَها فَالماسُ فحمٌ والعَقيقُ نبِيلُ !.

Signed Amira obeid

11 Jan 2023, 12:20 UTC≈2,850 viewsread 10 August 2026

ما اعتدتُ بُعدَكَ، ربّما أتظاهرُ دومًا أمامَ القلبِ وجهُكَ حاضِرُ . جُرحٌ كبيرٌ أنّنا لن نلتقي فإذا نسيتَ.. فذاكَ جُرحٌ آخَرُ! .

Signed Amira obeid

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @inthedeeps. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“في الأعماق 🌿” (@inthedeeps), 53 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inthedeeps.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.