Channel
@interosteo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,671subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001266671620 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @interosteo |
| Description | Про остеопатию для профессионалов от врача-остеопата, преподавателя остеопатии Олега Бабкина. Авторские техники, разборы пациентов, остео-жизнь. Подписывайтесь) |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/interosteo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 4,671 | +7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:52 | 4,664 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 4,666 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 9 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (9 April 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,062 |
| Reactions total | 273 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,166 reactions across 21 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 832 | 71.4% | |
| 🥰 | 334 | 28.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,166reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
У вам комфортно смотреть короткие видео прямо из телеграма?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Решил рисовать рилсы. Здесь про то, как растущий мозг отменяет мезенхиму изнутри, а снаружи удерживает граница тела. Мезенхима уплотняется и становится ТМО. 14 августа - кружок по основам работы с твёрдой мозговой оболочкой. Есть ещё пара мест. Пост про кружок 14 августа. https://t.me/interosteo/639
👍27🥰11
🙈🙊 Остеопатия, как я чувствую, включает в себя и доказательную медицинскую часть и необъяснимое логикой волшебство. Это две противоположности, образующие устойчивое целое, равновесие. Как результат - спорю и с целителями и с очень доказательными врачами (скрины из запретограмма).
👍42🥰11
Posted without readable text
👍7
Тяпка в тканях Работа со швами и рубцами, 4 часть. (начало) Иногда рубец значительно жёстче окружающих тканей. При пальпации плоскость рубца хорошо ощущается как упругая пластина. Пластина начинается на коже видимым швом, рубцом. От шва пластина уходит в тело почти перпендикулярно поверхности. Пластина пальпаторно ощущается склеенной с окружающими тканями. При остеопатической работе возникает интересный пальпаторны…
👍19
Про принцип равновесия центральных структур тела и периферических. Вчера был красивый случай такой взаимосвязи. У пациента были обычные жалобы на боли в межлопаточной области и ограничена подвижность средних рёбер справа, грудобрюшной диафрагмы. На мою работу ткани отзывались вяло и не было такого, что кладёшь руку и чувствуешь, как всё тело на это реагирует. Я пошёл снова слушать организм и пришёл к правому плечу,…
👍51🥰11
Posted without readable text
🥰17👍12
Здравствуйте, друзья. Весь этаж, где мой кабинет, пуст. Все в отпусках. Хожу по коридору один. У нас с отпуском как-то не сложилось этим летом. Работаю. А как вы? Уже ездили в отпуск?
🥰38👍27
Друзья, готово видео июньского кружка ✳️ Диагностике висцерального и краниосакрального столбов Видео можно посмотреть в Вк-видео и в Ютубе. Напишу тайм-коды, а после ссылки на само видео. 00:00 — Введение: Тело как система опор. О том, как внешние стрессы и «коллективное бессознательное» отражаются в теле пациента через усиление внутренних опор и напряжение. 01:20 — Концепция двух столбов. Разделение общего равнове…
👍28🥰17
Как остеопатическая пальпация, нейтральность, навык следования за тканями и слушания организма зависят от новых неудобных штанов? Очень сильно зависят.
👍57🥰14
Здравствуйте, друзья. Убрал я объявление о кружках, т.к. расписание у меня изменилось. Но это только внешний повод. Настоящая причина - это смешанные группы. Невозможно на одном кружке так дать материал, чтобы он был понятен и актуален одновременно как начинающим специалистам, так и врачам-остеопатам, закончившим большое обучение. Поэтому дальше буду делать два потока: 🌑 а) Классическая база Участникам, которые то…
👍75🥰17
Друзья, с праздником! Доброго остеопатического пути, вдохновения в работе и благодарности!
🥰73👍31
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @interosteo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
У вам комфортно смотреть короткие видео прямо из телеграма?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Интересная остеопатия” (@interosteo), 4,671 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/interosteo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.