Это многое говорит об обществе
😁87❤12🔥12👍5🌭2💯1
Signed Konstantin

Channel
@internetculture
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,089subscribers
-24 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001357161176 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @internetculture |
| Description | Каждую неделю я изучаю под сотню западных статей, подкастов и рассылок о трендах поведения людей в соцсетях, мессенджерах и играх, и рассказываю здесь о самом интересном. Второй канал: @creatoreconomy Автор: @kstgg |
| Created | 12 October 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/internetculture |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 10,089 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:22 | 10,093 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:51 | 10,094 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:12 | 10,098 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 10,102 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 10,104 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 10,107 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 10,113 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:49 | 10,113 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 7 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,230 reactions across 12 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 380 | 30.9% | |
| ❤ | 293 | 23.8% | |
| 😭 | 124 | 10.1% | |
| 💯 | 114 | 9.27% | |
| 🔥 | 70 | 5.69% | |
| 🫡 | 67 | 5.45% | |
| 😐 | 52 | 4.23% | |
| 🌚 | 33 | 2.68% | |
| 👀 | 33 | 2.68% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 1.87% | |
| 🤯 | 11 | 0.894% | |
| 🦄 | 9 | 0.732% | |
| 💅 | 8 | 0.65% | |
| 😡 | 8 | 0.65% | |
| 😈 | 3 | 0.244% | |
| 🌭 | 2 | 0.163% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,230reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 7 October 2025 to 28 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Это многое говорит об обществе
😁87❤12🔥12👍5🌭2💯1
Signed Konstantin
Если вам было мало платных ссылок в Reels (их там хотя бы не было и до этого), то держите еще сверху платные ссылки в Фейсбуке. Пишут, что креаторам без купленной верификации, которые попали в этот тест, больше не доступна публикация внешних ссылок во всех органических постах. Если вы хотели возразить, что ссылки и так все оставляют в первом комментарии, чтобы не вредить охватам и всё такое, то Фейсбук и это предус…
🌚19😐14❤7👍4😁2💯1🔥1
Signed Konstantin
🖱Занятие на ночь: листаем презу Social Signals от стратега Мэтью Стасофф о соцсетях, онлайн-культуре и поведении пользователей; вспоминаем уходящий год, ностальгируем, думаем. Версию-2024 можно посмотреть тут.
❤22🔥10👍3👀2💯1
Signed Konstantin
Две новости о Фейсбуке: • в Фейсбуке продолжает никто не сидеть. • Фейсбук, который всю жизнь топил за реальные имена и банил за псевдонимы, вводит никнеймы в группах. Думайте.
😁31❤6👀6🔥3💯1
Signed Konstantin
Твиттер добавил долгожданную фичу, которая отображает страну, в которой находится владелец аккаунта. Скрыть эти данные из своего профиля нельзя — вы можете выбрать либо страну, либо регион (Европа, Африка, Северная Америка и т.д.) Поначалу апдейт выкатили на пару часов и затем убрали, спровоцировав море спекуляций, но вчера вечером функция заработала у всех. И началось настоящее онлайн-линчевание с первыми жертвами…
😁89❤24💯13😡6🔥4😐4
Signed Konstantin
Интересно, получится ли у Нолана исторически достоверный циклоп.
😁49❤4🌚3🔥3💅2👍1🦄1
Signed Konstantin
Ладно, уговорили. Пузырь в $400 миллиардов того стоит.
😁105🔥12😐8💯3😈3🌚2👀2👍1
Signed Konstantin
Gen Z продолжают эксплуатировать миллениальскую ностальгию по нормальной жизни вне алгоритмов, фильтров и нейрошизы. Создатели нового приложения Dijie радикальным образом ответили на растущий у молодежи запрос на "соцсеть без ИИ-слопа": чтобы выкладывать там фотки, вам придется купить их камеру за $400. Камера синхронизируется с приложением на айфоне и выкладывает снимки с датой, числом просмотров и ссылкой на проф…
❤48👀20😁12🦄4👍3💅1😐1
Signed Konstantin
Прощай, Emojipedia.
🫡67😭24🤯11😐3👍2🔥1
Signed Konstantin
Лучшие умы пытаются выяснить откуда же взялся кризис фертильности, отсутствие секса у молодых людей и усугубляющийся разрыв в социально-политических взглядах двух полов. 6🤷♂️7, пацаны.
😭65😐19❤5💅5😁4🔥1
Signed Konstantin
Интересно в Твиттере наблюдать, как Дуров потихоньку включает режим Маска и пока в очень осторожной форме, как он всегда это делает, намекает западному сообществу, что их крайне правые политики — это добро. Маск, за свою недолгую политическую карьеру, успел громко поддержать обе упомянутые Дуровым партии. Что было дальше — вы знаете. Поссорился с Трампом, выперли из DOGE, после чего благополучно вернулся к роботам, …
😭35❤13🌚9🦄3😡2👍1🔥1😁1
Signed Konstantin
Дочь актера Робина Уилльямса написала в сторис эмоциональную реакцию на AI-слоп, прекрасно описав ~98% того, что я вижу, особенно за последнюю неделю. Пожалуйста, перестаньте присылать мне AI-видео с папой. Не надо думать, что я хочу это видеть или что «пойму» — нет, не хочу и не пойму. Если вы просто троллите — видела и похуже, я вас заблокирую и пойду дальше. Но если у вас вообще есть хоть капля приличия — прост…
❤152💯94🔥22👀3👍3😐3🦄1
Signed Konstantin
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @internetculture. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 438,399 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Интернет-культура” (@internetculture), 10,089 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/internetculture.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.