Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for International geopolity

Channel

International geopolity

@internationalgeopolity

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

134subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002343441758
TypeChannel
Username@internationalgeopolity
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/internationalgeopolity

Growth

133134133.511 August 2026 — 133 subscribers11 August 2026 — 133 subscribers17 August 2026 — 134 subscribers11 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 133–134 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 23:38134+1
11 Aug 2026, 13:42133no change
11 Aug 2026, 02:47133first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.0%
avg views ÷ 134 subscribers
Avg views / post
24.1
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held20 (5 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total483
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 36s
Average length
1m 12s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC11 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🇮🇳🇧🇩 R&AW Chief Parag Jain ढाका, बांग्लादेश पहुंचे, एक चार-सदस्यीय उच्च-स्तरीय प्रतिनिधिमंडल का नेतृत्व कर रहे थे। भारत-बांग्लादेश संबंधों को बेहतर बनाने के प्रयासों के बीच, प्रतिनिधिमंडल ने कथित तौर पर बांग्लादेशी खुफिया अधिकारियों और राजनीतिक नेताओं के साथ बैठकें कीं।

1

Signed Prashant solanki

10 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC13 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Indian envoy meets Bangladesh Tarique Rahman Before his meeting with Bangladeshi PM, Indian high commissioner met Bangladeshi FM Khalilur Rahman yesterday afternoon.

Signed Prashant solanki

10 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC13 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video

“If India attacks Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Türkiye will defend Pakistan,” says a Pakistani analyst. India & Israel: Say less. 💀🔥

Signed Prashant solanki

10 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC13 viewsread 11 August 2026

22 may prediction 8th August, 2026 X to shutdown revenue sharing program for creators

Signed Prashant solanki

10 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC15 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

7th August, 2026 China wants more than a Fort Knox from Hong Kong China central bank adds gold in Hong Kong amid trading hub push This accelerates a longer-term trend where the People’s Bank of China moves gold reserves back home from London.

Signed Prashant solanki

7 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC33 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🇲🇲🇹🇭🤝🏻🇮🇳 म्यांमार, थाईलैंड की संयुक्त विज्ञप्ति म्यांमार के राष्ट्रपति यू मिन ऑंग ह्लाइंग की बैंकॉक की यात्रा के बाद जारी हुई, जिसमें “भारत म्यांमार थाईलैंड त्रिपक्षीय राजमार्ग परियोजना की अग्रिम गति” का आह्वान किया गया है।

Signed .

7 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC35 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

एक सप्ताह में दूसरा अमेरिकी विश्वविद्यालय जो कर्मचारियों को जाने दे रहा है क्योंकि उनके पास भुगतान करने के लिए धन नहीं है। हावर्ड विश्वविद्यालय ने 600 संकाय और कर्मचारियों के पृथक्करण पैकेज की पेशकश की। एक आश्चर्य है, यहां वित्तीय संकट का कारण क्या है? answer- dedollarization अब dollar की printing बंद हो चुकी है

Signed .

7 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTC28 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🇧🇩High Commissioner Dinesh Trivedi met Bangladesh’s Power Minister. Bangladesh has request for more diesel supplies from India, via cross-border pipeline, according to Bangladesh media

Signed .

7 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTC26 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

India & China Hold Key Border Talks in Delhi. India and China held the latest Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination (WMCC) talks in New Delhi, with both sides holding detailed discussions on boundary delimitation, border management, mechanism-building, and trans-border cooperation. Translation- brics meeting भारत host karega । xi zinping भारत आने वाले हे

Signed .

7 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC23 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🇧🇩Bangladesh Government issues a strongly worded statement against Sheikh Hasina’s Press Conference in New Delhi. “Bangladesh is outraged that the absconding convicted genocider Sheikh Hasina was allowed this evening to engage in live interaction with the media in New Delhi where she and her henchmen launched venomous vitriol against the State of Bangladesh and her people.”

Signed .

7 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC23 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🇮🇳🇮🇱Benjamin Netanyahu called PM Narendra Modi, and they exchanged views on the recent developments in West Asia PM Modi, Netanyahu reaffirm India-Israel commitment on bilateral cooperation

Signed .

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @internationalgeopolity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 407,905 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“International geopolity” (@internationalgeopolity), 134 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/internationalgeopolity.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.