Channel
@interfeisno
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
204subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002690019852 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @interfeisno |
| Description | Мы Саша и Элла: разработчики. Build in public. Делаем iOS-продукты с нуля, показываем процесс, метрики, ошибки. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| On Telegram | t.me/interfeisno |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Oct 2026, 08:22 | 204 | no change |
| 6 Oct 2026, 06:41 | 204 | +1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:36 | 203 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:57 | 204 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 205 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 207 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 6 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (6 September 2026 – 7 October 2026) |
| Views total | 672 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Oct 2026, 08:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
18 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 9 | 50.0% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 22.2% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 11.1% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 11.1% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2026 to 7 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Apple в App Store Connect: с апреля 2027 нужны скриншоты под iPhone Duo для всех приложений на iOS 27.1 SDK и новее. У меня 20 приложений × несколько локализаций. Это сотни артбордов, руками такое не переделать. Готовые платформы есть, но по UX они не то, чего жду от рабочего инструмента. Так что буду делать своё решение и параллельно тестировать скриншоты под новый формат. До апреля успею? Посмотрим 😅 А вы как г…
🔥2👌1
Разобрала подробно: что закрыто, что занято, но не закрыто, как заходить без долгих замеров и какие смежные функции строить вокруг ядра. | Читать на vc.ru
👍2
Срез через год: два моих приложения принесли около $40 на двоих. Выручка скромная, зато выводов хватило на целую статью 😄 | Читать на vc.ru
👍4
Добавили ключевые слова на скриншоты в надежде на OCR-индексацию, а получили ровно 0 поискового эффекта 😅 Почему красивая ASO-теория провалилась на реальном тесте, как на самом деле работает компьютерное зрение у Google и почему в App Store всё иначе — разобрала в новой статье. | Читать на vc.ru
Как OCR-алгоритмы App Store и Google Play считывают ваши скриншоты — и как этим пользоваться | Читать на vc.ru
❤2👍2
Любителям спорных UX-решений посвящается 💡 Вы когда-нибудь оформляли заказ на кровать или шкаф, даже не заглянув в корзину? Очевидно, нет. Но в Hoff при свайпе влево в «Избранном» товар не удаляется, а улетает прямиком в корзину. Метрик эффективности этого решения у нас нет, но с точки зрения UX возник рискованный сценарий. Вместо удобства интерфейс может создавать лишнюю рутину по очистке корзины и превращать «Изб…
Ник Эйб, создатель игры Dayzle, запустил рекламу с дневным бюджетом 40 канадских долларов и поставил алгоритму условие: платить не больше $1.50 за одну установку. Первые дни реклама вообще не крутилась — за такую низкую цену Google не мог найти аудиторию. Но как только Ник убрал это ограничение, система мгновенно потратила суточный максимум (80 канадских долларов) и отчиталась о 21 новой установке. Вот только в самой…
Сессии про iPhone Duo к просмотру (20 минут) • Адаптивный лейаут • Навигация, панели и бары Если работаете с камерой, то обязательно к просмотру что считать основной и фронталкой. Там запутаться можно
👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
😁4
Duo интересен именно тем, что складывается. Это другой пользовательский опыт, а такого в линейке айфонов ещё не было. Восторга нет, но пощупать хочется. 👇👇👇
Интереснее всего тут не сама функция, а то, что вокруг неё давно живёт целая категория в App Store. Приложения для split screen на iPhone — двойные браузеры, окно в окне, параллельные вкладки — существуют потому, что есть реальный спрос. Люди ищут это в поиске стора и ставят. Значит, задача у пользователя есть, а системного решения нет. И вот что важно для разработчика: даже если складной iPhone получит два приложе…
Нас двое — работаем с мужем вместе. И мы давно выбрали не фокус, а диверсификацию: 20 приложений в разных нишах. Аргумент за один продукт нам понятен и мы его уважаем. Глубина, знание своего пользователя, вся энергия в одну точку. Но диверсификация есть базовое правило в любом бизнесе, и разработка тут не исключение. Один продукт — это одна ставка: на нишу, на алгоритм стора, на то, что крупная платформа не выкатит…
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @interfeisno. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Интерфейсно — дизайн, который работает” (@interfeisno), 204 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/interfeisno.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.