Ура! Буквальный челлендж возвращается! #котизаи Давайте рисовать леттеринг 😍 #туса #леттеринг #челлендж
custom 52018122829248683601

Channel
@intereference
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
31subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001239187304 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @intereference |
| Description | интересные референсы из внешнего и внутреннего мира дизайнера |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/intereference |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 31 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 31 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (8 June 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 101 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 02:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5400209569790042029 | 6 | 75.0% | |
| custom 5201812282924868360 | 2 | 25.0% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ура! Буквальный челлендж возвращается! #котизаи Давайте рисовать леттеринг 😍 #туса #леттеринг #челлендж
custom 52018122829248683601
Вся важная информация для участников этого года 💼 В прошлом году челлендж превзошёл все ожидания, и цифры по всем параметрам были безумные В этом году мы не гонимся за рекордами, и хотим, чтобы этот челлендж прошёл для всех по-пижамному лампово и спокойно. Поэтому добавили щепотку изменений, и так как челлендж уже третий по счёту, то без магии цифр не обошлось: 1️⃣Разрешаем пропустить и наверстать в другие дни 3 б…
Прощай iCloud 🌧️🥳🍾 #КотиЗаи протестила на себе и вам рекомендую! #SanDisk — внешний жесткий диськ для mac/ios/android на 1ТB (как у меня на фото) ищите на маркетплейсах Подходит вам, если: — не хотите до конца дней мучиться с оплатой подписок — нужна резервная копия телефона (в их приложении есть такая фича, Я протестила — работает! 😍) — хотите скопировать файлы на диск, освободив место на телефоне (есть такая фич…
Ура! Выставка! 🖼️ #КотиЗаи собрала для вас мини ретро текущей экспозиции, всё, что мне оооооч понравилось Особенный кайф — картины на деревянных досках и обратный контраст 😍 Оч рекомендую, не смотря на погоду: Арт-платформа Куб (cube.moscow) // Хотя я вот люблю гулять в дождик 🌧️☔️ Когда нет ветра 🤭 #кудаСходитьДизайнеру #вдохновение #выставка #искусство #art #cubeMoscow
custom 54002095697900420292
Раскревечиваемся #котизаи 🍤😅 Принесла вам шикарный референс от команды разработчиков, которые предлагают заказчикам расслабиться и отдать проект в их надежные руки Раскреветиться можно прям на их сайте 😂 https://railway.com/peace/ Мда, реально подобрали исчерпывающую и цепляющую метафору и отлично реализовали в коде👌Браво 👏 А как вам такая идея и реализация? Заказали бы у них разработку? 🤭 #theBestReference #реф…
custom 54002095697900420293
#Роспотребнадзор — #фас ! Стоило всего лишь один единственный раз поинтересоваться квартирой у застройщика #ПИК как они тут же цинично продали твой номер всем кому попало! Мне названивают все сорта агентств по недвижимости, даже после того как я им 5 раз сказала, что у меня нет денег, не звоните сюда больше На скрине пример количество и частота обзвонов в день, поэтому прошу Роспотребнадзор и ФАС обратить на это п…
Когда проблемы с гео - получите 🍆, а не такси вовремя #яндекстакси #светлоебудущее #мем #ux #бедыСгео
custom 54002095697900420291
Смотреть до конца! Невероятный экшн 🤪 Концовка вас удивит… или уже нет 🤭 В удивительное время живем #котизаи #яндекс #хуяндекс #алиса #ии #ux #сюр #ниченизя #светлоебудущее
custom 52018122829248683601
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @intereference. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Интереференс” (@intereference), 31 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/intereference.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.