Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

👥ИНТЕРАКТИВЫ ТЕЛЕГРАМ

@interaktivwm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

598subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001314402480
TypeChannel
Username@interaktivwm
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/interaktivwm

Growth

5987 Aug 2026, 10:18 — 598 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 02:06 — 598 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 10:188 Aug 2026, 02:06
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 597–599 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 02:06598no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:18598first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 18 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.669%
avg views ÷ 598 subscribers
Avg views / post
4.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026
Posts held18 (18 March 202616 July 2026)
Views total4
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2026, 13:58 UTC4 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sbarskaya_alla

Эксперимент удался! Щедро делюсь инструментом, который привел мне клиентов и множество полезных связей 💕 Рассказываю 👇🏼 Одна из моих клиенток посоветовала мне ПРАЙД 🦁 и первая моя реакция была - «да нуу это обычный чат взаимной активности, где всем друг на друга плевать, каждый заинтересован только создать мнимый ажиотаж на своей странице» 🤨 Но вот какими были её аргументы: ✅ Это приход новой целевой аудитории н

28 May 2026, 16:53 UTC15 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sbarskaya_allaPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

28 May 2026, 16:53 UTC22 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sbarskaya_allaVoice message

Ваш продукт купят либо у вас, либо у ваших конкурентов! И вот почему 👆🏼 Меня удобно слушать на 1,5х Заходи на РЕТРИТ ПРОДАЖ и не оставишь не одного шанса своей аудитории не купить у ТЕБЯ 🔗 отзывы участников Стартуем 2 июня! У нас уже набрался офигенный состав из разных ниш 🤩 Я с вами качать свои продажи 🔥🔥

26 May 2026, 13:53 UTC12 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sbarskaya_allaPhoto

Ктоооо кто проживает на дне телеграма? - тот, кто не вкладывает смыслы в контент и не умеет управлять вниманием аудитории - тот, кто не учитывает психологические особенности клиентов и критерии принятия решения во время покупки ВЫ ГОТОВЫ, ДЕТИ? На практикуме РЕТРИТ продаж я собрала самые эффективные рычаги, влияющие на ваши продажи: ➡️ перезагрузим продающий контент 🟢создадим концепцию из постов, наполненных п

19 May 2026, 12:45 UTC7 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sbarskaya_allaPhoto

Делать деньги без маркетинга может только монетный двор. Я ежедневно наблюдаю как люди теряют свое время. Не просто люди, а творческие, талантливые, способные люди, с крутыми продуктами, актуальными навыками, креативным подходом. Что они делают? Проживают в собственных иллюзиях. Экспериментируют, что-то постят, работают над комментингом, шевелятся мало-мальски. А где деньги? А их не было и нет. Если у вас нет прод

15 May 2026, 08:37 UTC7 viewsread 7 August 2026

Всё послушала, готова взять, куда платить?)

15 May 2026, 08:37 UTC6 viewsread 7 August 2026

Я надеюсь ты там реквизиты диктуешь 😂

15 May 2026, 08:37 UTC8 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sbarskaya_allaPhoto

Научу вашу аудиторию покупать у вас 🔥 и вам будут писать так же 👆🏼 Самое важное действие аудитории - ПОКУПКА На практикуме «РЕТРИТ продаж» мы запустим это действие 🚀 Я не буду учить вас отрабатывать возражения 🙅🏼‍♀️ «Сейчас коридор затмений начался, он закончится в конце июня, тогда я к вам приду» «Я не могу, мне приснилось, что покупать 22 числа это плохая примета» «Я не могу сегодня, у меня день молчания и от

10 May 2026, 18:05 UTC9 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sbarskaya_alla

Сегодня сгорает один бонус 🔥🔥🔥 Спринт «личный бренд без лица» бонусом для тех, кто успевает зайти на «РЕТРИТ продаж» На спринте - ты прокачаешь подачу себя и выйдешь на уровень сильного личного бренда, оставаясь при этом собой! Личный бренд, который будет влюблять в себя аудиторию, за которым будут следовать, который будет мотивировать, восхищать, у которого хотят покупать, в окружении которого стремятся находиться

8 May 2026, 12:32 UTC6 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sbarskaya_allaVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @interaktivwm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“👥ИНТЕРАКТИВЫ ТЕЛЕГРАМ” (@interaktivwm), 598 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/interaktivwm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.