Bot
ربات دانلود از اینستاگرام
@instafiler_bot
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry
611,777monthly users
-380,364 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | 7692995488 |
|---|---|
| Type | Bot |
| Username | @instafiler_bot |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/instafiler_bot |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Monthly users | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 611,777 | -125,603 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 12:55 | 737,380 | -21,890 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 759,270 | -27,598 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:39 | 786,868 | -58,724 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 845,592 | -16,624 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 862,216 | -17,395 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 879,611 | -18,810 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:38 | 898,421 | -28,745 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:54 | 927,166 | +342 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:15 | 926,824 | -3,003 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 929,827 | -5,919 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 935,746 | -4,711 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 940,457 | -2,460 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 942,917 | -4,089 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 947,006 | -2,339 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 949,345 | -23,302 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 972,647 | +572 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 972,075 | -2,468 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 974,543 | -4,777 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 979,320 | first reading |
Engagement
No post feed to measure. Telegram publishes a readable post stream for channels, not for bots, so views, reactions and engagement rates do not exist for this entry — they are not missing, pending or withheld. The register records what this handle is and what it resolves to.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@sedayetaroom · 44310 postsTailoring Training
@tall20 · 18 postsTHOMAS SHOP
@ThomasShelbyLove · 1285 posts🕸Bunker's Bug💜
@SZAR29MWINCHESTERSSARYEH · 2902 postsبافت خورشید☀️🧶
@baftt_khorshid · 8142 posts-𝙳𝙾𝚉𝙺𝙷𝙸𝙼
@rdie_aesheq · 172 postsتعاونی مصرف فرهنگیان ناحیه ۳ کرمانشاه
@tavoni3k · 8522 posts"فرهنگ و توسعه"
@FarhangTose_eh · 2351 postکانال روستای گونج
@Gavanaj · 3541 postکانال تخصصی کلاس اول وپنجم میکانیکی گلبهار چاپ مقالات پژوهشی ودفتر خلاق نگاره😍avalmikaniki@لینک کانال
@avalmikaniki · 6281 postچـــــــنارلــق🌴
@chenarlog · 1381 postروانشناسی-احساس خوب
@ehsasekhooob · 3761 postیکترکخوردهی جانسخت
@elnazyeghane · 8011 postانگلیسی
@englishticher · 11 postمیگرینی ها
@migren_baneh · 3141 postNatgeo_wild_amazing
@natgeo_wild_amazing · 301 postنیش دارو(شعرهای حسین پورقلی)
@purgholi71 · 1731 postتک کلینیک
@royaal_skin · 801 postهزارمین سین !
@sabasinsinsin · 1991 postتعزیه درونکلا
@taziyedaronkola · 511 post❤️🩹دلنوشته دلبر آهنی💊
@text_mashin_bazi · 3531 postYanesarii.art
@yanesarii_art · 471 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@MP_ZG · 938,81464 postshttps://t.me/SpotifyFiler
@SpotifyFiler · 14 postsکانال تخصصی کلاس اول وپنجم میکانیکی گلبهار چاپ مقالات پژوهشی ودفتر خلاق نگاره😍avalmikaniki@لینک کانال
@avalmikaniki · 6281 postانجمن 💞TM_AZARBAYJAN💞 💞v2rayNG server 💞 🌐
@AZARBAYJAB1 · 4,1531 post𝑬𝒍’𝒂𝒎𝒐𝒖𝒓
@Elamour · 7,6131 postکانال روستای گونج
@Gavanaj · 3541 postمیگرینی ها
@migren_baneh · 3141 postنیش دارو(شعرهای حسین پورقلی)
@purgholi71 · 1731 post❤️🩹دلنوشته دلبر آهنی💊
@text_mashin_bazi · 3531 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ربات دانلود از اینستاگرام” (@instafiler_bot), 611,777 monthly users as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/instafiler_bot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.