Channel
@insta_dev_it
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
147subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001104487335 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @insta_dev_it |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 31 July 2018— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/insta_dev_it |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 147 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 148 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:09 | 148 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 17 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
70 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 37 | 52.9% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 27.1% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2024 to 30 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
128 Кб/с. Столько Телеграм сейчас выделяет на загрузку фоточки. Для справки: это скорость dial-up модема из 2003 года. Двадцать три года прогресса — и мы снова ждём, пока загрузится картинка. 12 800 жалоб в день, 40% пользователей с проблемами, РБК пишет про полную блокировку с 1 апреля. А бизнес, который вёл запись клиентов через ТГ, теряет 20–40% выручки. Не абстрактно «ухудшилось» — а конкретно: салон в Москве з…
🔥2
InstaDev в кейсе Рейтинга Рунета Участие в Рейтинге Рунета помогло нам раскрыть экспертизу в проектах, которые обычно остаются под NDA - например, в сфере авиаперевозок. Благодаря РР мы подтвердили свою квалификацию, усилили доверие со стороны рынка и начали получать более крупные заказы в этих нишах. В интервью для редакции делимся цифрами, результатами и практическим опытом участия.
🔥2
👌 ROI 2445% от участия в рейтингах РР у мобильных разработчиков из Петербурга — кейс InstaDev Чеки от 500 тысяч и десятки заявок, опережающие по качеству все остальные каналы маркетинга и продаж: https://cmsmagazine.ru/journal/items-items-case-instadev-rr/ Участие в РР — это как SEO, только бодрее. — Николая Соцкий, CEO InstaDev Очень понятное сравнение, особенно с учётом того, как ИИ-агенты относятся к рейтингам.…
🔥4
Приложение FIT&ZEN с видеотренировками и как мы вошли в проект, когда сроки уже горели
🔥7
Как общепиту превращать подписчиков и гостей в стабильную выручку?
🔥6
Как запустить свой маркетплейс и сколько это будет стоить?
🔥2
Недавно мы писали, что с нами можно зарабатывать на партнёрстве — передавать клиентов в мобильную разработку и получать вознаграждение. Теперь мы собрали полноценный курс, который помогает разобраться, как правильно работать с такими заявками и не терять лиды по дороге. В этом курсе мы показали: - как устроен рынок мобильной разработки — какие ниши сейчас в росте; - как быстро понять, будет ли запрос платёжеспособ…
❤3
Как взламывают Айфоны? Рассказали в статье - в связи с последними событиями.
👍1
Внимание! От имени компании Instadev действуют мошенники. В последние дни злоумышленники приглашают людей на «собеседования» от нашего имени, после чего блокируют устройства и вымогают деньги за разблокировку. Эти действия не имеют никакого отношения к Instadev. Instadev никогда не просит доступ к вашим устройствам, не требует оплат, кодов или переводов во время собеседований. Все наши интервью проходят только по о…
❤7
Совместно с CYCLE рассказали о том - как отслеживать эффективность рекламы.
❤2🔥2
Безопасность мобильных приложений в 2025: что реально работает и как избежать типовых уязвимостей
🔥4👍3
«Скупой платит трижды»: почему поддержка устаревшего ПО обходится бизнесу дороже, и как посчитать свой технический долг? Компании годами латают старые приложения, избегая затрат на модернизацию. Но технический долг (отложенные затраты на модернизацию) может привести к финансовому краху. По данным Gartner, до 60% IT-бюджетов компаний расходуется на поддержку legacy-систем вместо развития новых решений. Приложения во…
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @insta_dev_it. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 661,216 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@insta_dev_it named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“InstaDev mobile” (@insta_dev_it), 147 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/insta_dev_it.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.