Channel
@insighteater
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,987subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001602591598 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @insighteater |
| Created | Between 1 November 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/insighteater |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 2,987 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:41 | 2,990 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 2,992 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 2,992 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 21,120 |
| Reactions total | 23 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 00:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
23 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 56.5% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 17.4% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 13.0% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 8.70% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 4.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
넥스트레이드는 7일 보도설명자료를 통해 "정적 변동성완화장치(VI) 제도 도입 전까지 한시적으로 프리마켓에서의 상·하한가 주문을 금지해 주문 오류로 인한 상·하한가 체결 사례를 최소화해 나가겠다"고 밝혔다. 앞서 지난 6일 SK하이닉스가 넥스트레이드 프리마켓에서 11주 거래만으로 시초가 하한가를 기록하는 사태가 발생했다. 지난 5일에는 삼성전기와 알테오젠이 1주 거래로 전 거래일 종가 대비 상한가에서 시초가를 형성했다. https://n.news.naver.com/article/277/0005800326?sid=101
헐...... https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/079/0004176408?rc=N&ntype=RANKING&sid=104
❤1
'시추에이셔널 어웨어니스', 4억 달러 투자로 투자 시장 복귀 4억 달러 규모의 신규 투자 진행 레오폴드 아셴브레너(Leopold Aschenbrenner)가 이끄는 헤지펀드 '시추에이셔널 어웨어니스(Situational Awareness)'가 비상장 기업에 4억 달러(약 5,500억 원)를 투입하며 투자 활동을 재개했습니다. (투자는 화요일에 완료됨) 최근의 붕괴 위기 극복 불과 며칠 전, 해당 헤지펀드는 월가 대출 기관들로부터 밀려든 잇따른 마진콜(증거금 추가 납부 요구) 폭격으로 인해 붕괴 직전의 위기를 겪었습니다. 재기를 위한 첫 행보 이번 4억 달러 투자는 마진콜 파동으로 크게 흔들렸던 '시추에이셔널 어웨어니스'를 아셴브레너가 어떻게 재건하고 수습할 것인지 보여주는 첫 번째 신호탄으로 평가받고 있습니다. https://www.…
네이버: 크림에 추가출자 https://n.news.naver.com/article/374/0000525531?sid=101
💅2
애초에 이런걸 왜 문제제기하며 기사화하는건지 이해가 안됌... https://share.google/7iVG1Di8cMPSO2MYq
❤2👎1
» 월가 은행들, 레버리지 ETF의 위험을 'Crash Put'으로 전가 » 글로벌 전반에서 레버리지 ETF들이 급증함에 따라 월가 은행들은 'Crash Put'이라는 파생상품을 통해 주가 급락의 손실 위험을 다른 투자자에게 전가 중. 강한 수요가 유입 » 'Crash Put'은 기초 종목이 하루에 50% 가까이 폭락할 경우 손실을 보장하는 보험 성격의 상품. 주로 은행들이 레버리지 ETF의 테일 리스크를 헤지하는 통로로 활용 » SK하이닉스, 삼성전자 관련해서도 2배 레버리지 ETF의 테일 리스크를 최장 1년간 떠안는 대가로 높은 수익률을 제시(GS: 14.2%~20.0%) 월가 은행들, 레버리지 ETF 리스크 '크래시 풋'으로 떠넘긴다 - "이런 수요 처음"…SK하이닉스·삼성전자 겨냥 상품 수익률 14.2∼20% https://…
❤1
Video, posted without a caption
❤2
- 01년생 컬럼비아대 출신 레오폴드 아센브리너 - 오픈AI연구원출신, 퇴사후 165페이지짜리 AI 비전을 제시하는 논문발표후 투자자금이 자발적으로 모여 이후 단기 수백퍼센트 수익률을 기록하며 월가의 초신성 펀드매니저로 떠오름 - 주요포지션은 하드웨어 레버리지 롱, 소프트웨어 숏 - 심지어 본인운영 펀드의 포지션도 오픈하며 꺼드럭 거린 측면이 있음 - 월가의 올드한 형님들이 그걸 못마땅했는지 7월초부터 조심스럽게 잡도리들어감. 겉으로는 천재라 칭송하고 우쭈쭈 우쭈쭈해주며 , 뒤로는 레오폴드 반대포지션으로 작업진행 - 잡도리 과정에서 하이라이트는 현재 월가에서 가장 영향력있는 거대 헤지펀드 시타델 에서 금리인상 기사를 계속 내보내며 공포감 조성, 그리고 공매도 포지션 구축 - 이번주 주말 결혼을 앞둔 레오폴드는 자기 인생의 가장 큰…
❤2
시장 빠지는 각도가 수직낙하다보니 이정도면 이제 완만한 하락, 건전한 조정으로 보이는...... 아 바로 위에 오리 그거는 뭐냐고 누가 물었는데 돈없어서 걍 잡아먹었습니다.
🔥4
장이 빠질땐 오리를 보자
❤3😁3
최악... https://n.news.naver.com/article/018/0006337279
마이크론 - 어제 누군가 다음주 만기 콜옵션을 무려 1억달러 어치 매수
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @insighteater. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 384,516 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“인싸이터(Insight Eater) - 통찰력을 먹고 사는 인싸들 <비상장/VC투자>” (@insighteater), 2,987 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/insighteater.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.