Channel

INSIGHT advocates

@insightadvocates

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

315subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001238530799
Type	Channel
Username	@insightadvocates
Created	Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	6 August 2026
Last confirmed live	15 August 2026
Measurements held	3
Confirmed unchanged	2 times, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/insightadvocates

Growth

3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 314–315 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
7 Aug 2026, 19:10	315	+1
6 Aug 2026, 22:17	314	no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:47	314	first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 9 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days: 24.0%; avg views ÷ 315 subscribers
Avg views / post: 75.8; 4 posts measured
Reaction rate: 12.0%; reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window: 4; of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
Window	Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held	17 (9 May 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total	303
Reactions total	28
Forwards / comments	not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken	6 Aug 2026, 22:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

134 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
❤	48	35.8%
custom 5292258642001688712	29	21.6%
custom 5460902740492314911	23	17.2%
custom 5235766417466343721	10	7.46%
🤩	9	6.72%
custom 5395732581780040886	8	5.97%
🏆	3	2.24%
😍	2	1.49%
😎	2	1.49%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC23 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Forwarded from @SedliarVNPhoto

В предыдущем посте рассказал о спортивной части «Бизнеса на скорости»: формате Time Attack, квалификационных сессиях и финальных заездах 🏎 Но мы отдельно продумали и развлекательную программу, чтобы гости могли не только наблюдать за гонкой, а прикоснуться к автоспорту и интересно провести время. На площадке будут разные активности для гостей: от гоночного турнира на PlayStation с эксклюзивными призами до пассажирс…

😎2❤1custom 54609027404923149111

28 Jul 2026, 10:57 UTC138 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Video

🔥 Гонка «Бизнес на скорости» вместе с INSIGHT advocates и INSIGHT Capital 🛞 📢 13 августа мы проведем на профессиональной трассе Moscow Raceway закрытое спортивно-деловое мероприятие для клиентов, партнеров, предпринимателей и представителей профессионального сообщества. ⭐️ Приглашаем вас присоединиться! В качестве гонщика или зрителя — выбирайте сами. В центре программы — гонка на спортивных автомобилях в формате T…

🤩7❤5custom 52357664174663437215🏆1custom 54609027404923149111

27 Jul 2026, 07:44 UTC72 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Photo

#МывСМИ Кассация: исполнительский иммунитет защищает дарение единственной квартиры ➖➖➖➖➖➖ ⚔️ Соуправляющий партнер INSIGHT advocates Елизавета Порамонова прокомментировала для портала PROбанкротство вопрос о возможности оспаривания сделки с единственным жильем должника. Кассация отменила решения нижестоящих судов и указала, что дарение квартиры нельзя оспорить, если после возврата в конкурсную массу она все равно б…

custom 52922586420016887122custom 54609027404923149112❤1

24 Jul 2026, 14:55 UTC70 viewsread 6 August 2026

Photo

#МывСМИ ЗПИФ в меняющихся рыночных условиях ➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🗣️ Советник практики ЗПИФ и защита активов INSIGHT advocates Олег Седляр прокомментировал для «Московской перспективы» ситуацию на рынке ЗПИФ недвижимости. 💵 В материале эксперты разобрали, как на стоимость коммерческой недвижимости повлияли высокая ключевая ставка и изменение рыночной конъюнктуры, а также в каких случаях инвесторы могут ставить вопрос об оспарив…

16 Jul 2026, 10:50 UTC61 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Forwarded from @SedliarVNPhoto

Каким я вижу INSIGHT advocates через пять лет? Для юрбизнеса рост часто воспринимается как безусловное благо: больше сотрудников, практик, проектов и, конечно же, денег. Но сам по себе масштаб ничего не говорит о качестве работы. Мы не хотим превращаться в юридический завод, где сложные задачи раскладывают на станки, а партнер подключается только к финальной встрече с клиентом чтобы получить деньги. Систему можно …

❤3custom 52922586420016887123custom 54609027404923149113🏆1

7 Jul 2026, 07:44 UTC95 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Video

#МывСМИ INSIGHT advocates в «Коммерсанте»: как юридический консалтинг помогает бизнесу выйти из лабиринта сложных решений ➖➖➖➖➖➖ ⚔️ Партнеры INSIGHT advocates Владислав Седляр, Елизавета Порамонова и Олег Седляр в интервью изданию «Коммерсантъ». 📄 Материал под названием «Юридический лабиринт требует выхода, а не хождения по кругу» посвящен тому, как сегодня меняется роль юридического консультанта. Если раньше бизн…

❤3custom 52922586420016887123custom 53957325817800408863

15 Jun 2026, 07:54 UTC116 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Photo

#МывСМИ Елизавета Порамонова для Право.ru: о правовой судьбе судебных расходов в банкротстве ➖➖➖➖➖➖ ⚔️ Соуправляющий партнер INSIGHT advocates Елизавета Порамонова выступила экспертом Право.ru в обзоре новых дел Верховного суда. Она прокомментировала спор о правовом режиме судебных расходов в банкротстве и объяснила, почему при определении их очередности важно учитывать не только дату взыскания, но и связь с основн…

❤3custom 52922586420016887123custom 54609027404923149113

8 Jun 2026, 08:02 UTC111 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Photo

#МывСМИ Сделка закрыта, но долги остались: кто отвечает за старые займы компании. Елизавета Порамонова для РБК Pro. ➖➖➖➖➖➖ 📰 Собственник выдавал займы компании, а потом продал. У компании остался перед ним долг, но новый владелец довел ее до банкротства. Что делать в этом случае, рассказывает Елизавета Порамонова, адвокат, соуправляющий партнер INSIGHT advocates. 📄 В статье Елизавета разбирает новый подход ВС РФ к…

❤2custom 52922586420016887122🤩1custom 54609027404923149111

5 Jun 2026, 14:00 UTC165 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Photo

#кейсыАБ Дело ООО "Брод-Эстейт": очередность требований ДГИ ➖➖➖➖➖➖ 📌 Конкурсный управляющий и кредитор добились понижения очередности требований Москвы, получившей права дольщиков после предоставления им замещающего жилья. 📄 Департамент обратился с кассационной жалобой в Верховный суд, настаивая, что его действия носили социальный, а не инвестиционный характер и по аналогии с ППК «Фонд развития территорий» очередн…

❤4custom 52922586420016887123custom 53957325817800408863

5 Jun 2026, 08:10 UTC105 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Photo

#говорятэксперты 🗣 ➖➖➖➖➖➖ Петербургский правовой саммит 👥 28-29 мая прошел пятый Петербургский правовой саммит, объединяющий руководителей юрдепов со всей России и представителей ведущих юрфирм. 🧡 Соуправляющий партнер INSIGHT advocates Елизавета Порамонова выступила в рамках сессии, посвященной субсидиарной ответственности, и рассказала о привлечении к ответственности участников группы компаний. В своем выступлен…

❤4custom 52922586420016887122custom 53957325817800408862custom 54609027404923149112

4 Jun 2026, 13:15 UTC123 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Photo

#МывСМИ Обжаловать привлечение к субсидиарке поздно. Как уменьшить размер субсидиарки до нуля. ➖➖➖➖➖➖ ⚔️ Статья ведущего юриста практики Банкротство Сайхана Сарбаа опубликована в журнале «Арбитражная практика для юристов». В материале автор разбирает актуальную практику Верховного суда и арбитражных судов, а также способы защиты при привлечении к субсидиарной ответственности за непередачу документов, убыточные сде…

❤10custom 54609027404923149117custom 52922586420016887125

3 Jun 2026, 07:22 UTC95 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Photo

#МывСМИ В банкротстве важна добросовестность ➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🧡 В Адвокатской газете опубликована статья управляющего партнера INSIGHT advocates Владислава Седляра о критериях добросовестности гражданина-должника при решении вопроса об освобождении от обязательств по итогам процедуры реализации имущества. ✔️ В статье Владислав анализирует позицию Верховного Суда РФ по делу № А40-230236/2015: суды должны оценивать не только …

❤2custom 52357664174663437212custom 52922586420016887122

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @insightadvocates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 86,421 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Владислав Седляр INSIGHT
@SedliarVN · 3102 posts

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Владислав Седляр INSIGHT
@SedliarVN · 31010 posts

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“INSIGHT advocates” (@insightadvocates), 315 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/insightadvocates.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.