Я конечно гений. Что комменты не открыл. Спасибо что написали)
😁2

Channel
@insidesinmask
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
296subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001793038120 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @insidesinmask |
| Description | Помните, это не является фин. рекомендацией, мы публикуем только наше мнение и за ваши убытки не несем ответственность. Chat: @insidesinmaskchat Админ: @Withoytcup |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/insidesinmask |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 296 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:20 | 296 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
44 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 13 | 29.5% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 22.7% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 18.2% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 11.4% | |
| 💅 | 4 | 9.09% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 4.55% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 2.27% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 2.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2024 to 15 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я конечно гений. Что комменты не открыл. Спасибо что написали)
😁2
Привет) 👋 я тут вспомнил что у меня есть этот акк и свой маленький тгк:) Рассказывайте как у вас дела? Кто чем занимается и тд.
🤯1
Честно не верил что соберут) но собрали за 1.5 часа. Быстро довольно. Хороший будет подарок на др надеюсь
💅1
Они поменяли хардкап и макс бай, поменяли пресейл линк. Новый линк: https://www.pinksale.finance/launchpad/ethereum/0x780C40B832A70FbF2ec037f2D3F9E3e67356AE6b
💅1
Ну все. Мне недавно 22 стукнуло… пздц…
🎉2😁1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥1
Был вчера на АМА у проекта, который по сути знает каждый трейдер в DeFi рынке! И это #CrazyBunny на эфире! Немного о прошлых результатах CrazyBunny на BSC and SOL: BSC: Токен сделал более 600х, 8000+ holders, CEX listing, CMC&CG, official partnership Babydoge, реклама на Time Square. SOL: Был presale 2000 SOL(sold out 10min), 8/9x для прессейльщиков, 4500+ holders, listing MEXC, CMC&CG, support t1 KOLs. ТЕРЕРЬ Н…
❤8👍8🔥7💅2
https://t.me/borkgate https://dexscreener.com/solana/bmnjjvnmmxstdxxh2vzfchp79hngzxvp5xuf6dkdsnt7
🦴Появилась новая возможность фармить поинты DOGS 🐶 🗯Теперь нам нужно ежедневно посещать бот и забирать дополнительные награды. ✅Ссылка на бот 🤖 👇 https://t.me/dogshouse_bot/join?startapp=FlWV4j2aStuF_eTmgrjyXA ❗️Кстати проект набирает достаточно стремительно обороты за первые 10 дней уже более 20 миллионов пользователей🔝 P.S. Знаю что всех уже мягко скажем утомили эти тапалки, но что поделать, они все еще актуал
вкусно
⏺ Тапалка от биржи OKX? Появилась бета-версия тапалки, от ОКХ. Пока это тестовая версия, по слухам официальный анонс и релиз будет завтра. Но чем раньше вы войдете, тем лучше. Бонусы за раннее участие возможны... Заходим! https://t.me/OKX_official_bot/OKX_Racer?startapp=linkCode_99307101 Смысл тапалки: угадать куда двинется курс Биткоина через 5 секунд. Вверх или вниз. Угадали? Получаете поинты!
👍1🔥1🤩1
х2 с поста, х4 с дипа
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @insidesinmask. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 648,269 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@insidesinmask named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Инсайды в балаклаве” (@insidesinmask), 296 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/insidesinmask.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.