Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for INSIDER ELITES

Channel

INSIDER ELITES

@insider_elites

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

83,886subscribers

+390 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003157538707
TypeChannel
Username@insider_elites
DescriptionЭлиты. Схемы. Влияние. Коррупция. Эксклюзивно о закулисье российских элит. Обратная связь: @mockingbird
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/insider_elites

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

90,600 average views per post against 83,886 subscribers — an engagement rate of 108.1%. Across the 8,178 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,626–99,968 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.00% and 21.2%, with a median of 10.5%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (17 July 2026 16 August 2026)
Posts measured18 of 18 published in the window (0 exact, 18 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled1,631,500
Mature posts only108.1% over 18 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers83,886 measured 15 August 2026
Cohortb31623:rus · 8,178 channels · p10 2.36% · p25 5.00% · p50 10.5% · p75 21.2% · p90 37.0%
Position in cohort99.731th percentile · 10.3× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.047% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 16 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

83,49684,31883,9076 August 2026 — 83,496 subscribers6 August 2026 — 83,505 subscribers7 August 2026 — 83,984 subscribers8 August 2026 — 84,318 subscribers9 August 2026 — 84,101 subscribers10 August 2026 — 83,888 subscribers11 August 2026 — 83,767 subscribers12 August 2026 — 83,835 subscribers13 August 2026 — 83,908 subscribers14 August 2026 — 83,942 subscribers15 August 2026 — 83,886 subscribers83,8866 August 202615 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net +390. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 83,373–84,441 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 17:2483,886-56
14 Aug 2026, 08:3883,942+34
13 Aug 2026, 01:2683,908+73
12 Aug 2026, 02:1283,835+68
11 Aug 2026, 03:0583,767-121
10 Aug 2026, 05:1883,888-213
9 Aug 2026, 05:2184,101-217
8 Aug 2026, 07:5884,318+334
7 Aug 2026, 08:1183,984+479
6 Aug 2026, 10:1083,505+9
6 Aug 2026, 01:3483,496first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
108.1%
avg views ÷ 83,886 subscribers
Avg views / post
90,600
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held27 (4 July 202613 August 2026)
Views total1,631,500
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 01:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Links
126

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
20
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 27 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @insider_elites. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC≈14,200 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ 5 000 ₽ — столько приносит одна сделка В день доступно 3-5 готовых сделок. Их находит ИИ и проверяют аналитики. От тебя — только повторить под сопровождением трейдеров. ❗️Можно без опыта и анализа графика, нужен телефон, обучение и час времени. Мы живём в эпоху, когда искусственный интеллект делает большую часть работы за нас, НО НЕ ВСЮ! И чтобы понять, как это работает — заходи в канал к Дмитрию. Все инструкц

13 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC≈16,600 viewsread 16 August 2026

Только сейчас, летом 2026-го, когда последние компании окончательно сменили вывески, а африканские потоки перестали даже формально проходить через старые пригожинские цепочки, стало возможно сказать: кейс закрыт. Не в 2023-м, когда разбился самолёт, и не в 2024-м, когда Павел Пригожин формально принял наследство. Тогда ещё сохранялась иллюзия, что сын удержит хотя бы часть прежней автономии. Сейчас уже видно, как име

12 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC≈21,300 viewsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Через 5 лет большинство людей пожалеют, что не покупали золото сегодня. Пока одни продолжают хранить деньги в валюте и надеяться на удачу, другие используют движения золота для создания дополнительного дохода. Самое интересное — для старта не нужны миллионы, связи или экономическое образование. На канале Альберта ежедневно выходят разборы рынка, реальные сделки и простые объяснения того, что происходит с золотом п

12 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC≈95,000 viewsread 16 August 2026

Зависимость российского нефтеперерабатывающего сектора от западных технологий превратилась из хронической проблемы в критическую уязвимость. Систематические удары беспилотников по ключевым установкам первичной переработки нефти (АВТ) на крупнейших заводах страны — от Нижегородского «Лукойла» до Рязанского и Туапсинского предприятий «Роснефти» — обнажили технологический тупик, в котором оказались российские сырьевые

11 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC≈19,500 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔴В 2025 году Россияне заработали 5,3 млрд рублей на Арбитраже криптовалют По данным Минфин 32% граждан покинули своё место работы, поскольку в среднем уже в первый месяц тут можно зарабатывать от 140 000 рублей, а через 2-3 месяца с легкостью выйти на семизначные числа. Самое смешное, что лишь 8% россиян что-то слышали об этой профессии, хотя все инструкции бесплатно лежат на канале Арбитраж Криптовалют Там объясн

11 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC≈23,500 viewsread 16 August 2026

Денис Паслер за полтора года на посту свердловского губернатора так и не смог выполнить то главное, ради чего, по сути, его и возвращали из Оренбурга: очистить Екатеринбург от плотного влияния металлургических групп РМК и УГМК и вычистить управленческую сеть, оставленную Евгением Куйвашевым. Вместо жёсткой зачистки регион получил осторожное топтание на месте, при котором старые игроки сохраняют позиции, а новые пробл

10 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC≈225,000 views0 reactions15 Starsread 16 August 2026

Схемы «экспансии КНР» в Сибирь: как китайский капитал скупает Байкал через подставных лиц и местных активистов Росфинмониторинг вскрыл масштабную сеть теневого финансирования в Иркутской области и Бурятии. Ведомство направило закрытые доклады в ФСБ и Администрацию Президента. Оперативники зафиксировали многомиллиардные проводки, конечной целью которых является установление полного контроля над байкальскими территори

7 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC≈45,600 viewsread 16 August 2026

Начало здесь. Допустив к выборам единственную легальную силу с антивоенной риторикой, однако уже сегодня Алексей Журавлёв от имени партии «Родина» направил в Верховный суд иск об отмене этой регистрации, используя финансовые претензии как формальный инструмент. Для либеральной башни сам факт попытки сохранить даже такой ограниченный элемент политического пространства становится частью последнего усилия удержать влия

7 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC≈153,000 viewsread 16 August 2026

Либеральная башня Кремля подходит к точке, за которой её влияние рискует окончательно раствориться в силовом консенсусе, и нынешний момент выглядит как последний шанс отстоять хотя бы минимальную автономию перед лицом требований полной милитаризации. Сергей Собянин пятого августа сформулировал позицию с предельной прямотой, назвав никчемными и ненужными разговоры о переводе всей экономики на военные рельсы и подчерк

5 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC≈150,000 views0 reactions5 Starsread 16 August 2026

Силовики зашли в структуры олигархической АФК «Система». Миллиардеру из списка Forbes Евтушенкову шьют «нелояльность» и масштабный вывод миллиардов под носом у Кремля Источники на Лубянке и в Следственном комитете сообщают о начале масштабных оперативно-следственных мероприятий в отношении ключевых активов АФК «Система» и близких к олигарху Владимиру Евтушенкову структур. Над миллиардером, который, казалось бы, давн

1 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTC≈225,000 viewsread 16 August 2026

Топливный кризис 2026 года стал не случайным сбоем, а удобным инструментом передела розничного рынка, в котором частные АЗС оказались расходным материалом. Пока очереди и лимиты создавали видимость общей проблемы, вертикально интегрированные компании и стоящие за ними лоббисты использовали ситуацию, чтобы окончательно закрепить преимущество и начать системный выкуп независимых станций. То, что выглядело как вынужден

31 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC≈136,000 viewsread 16 August 2026

В московских боксерских кругах разразился громкий скандал с исчезновением 32 миллионов рублей, которые автономная некоммерческая организация «Центр прогресса бокса» выделила на рекламную кампанию, так и не увидевшую свет. Обвинительное заключение прокуратуры Западного административного округа Москвы утверждает: блогерша, индивидуальный предприниматель и приближенная Умара Кремлева Виктория Логецкая, вышла на центр ч

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @insider_elites. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 12,456 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“INSIDER ELITES” (@insider_elites), 83,886 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/insider_elites.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.