Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for inside_in_sight

Channel

inside_in_sight

@inside_in_sight

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

19subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002327513539
TypeChannel
Username@inside_in_sight
DescriptionПсихология, психотерапия. Для записи на консультацию обращайтесь @Netuja
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/inside_in_sight

Growth

1910 Aug 2026, 19:16 — 19 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 17:46 — 19 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 19:1611 Aug 2026, 17:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18–20 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 17:4619no change
10 Aug 2026, 19:1619first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
32
Videos
2
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
58m 15s
Average length
58m 15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

37 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2464.9%
821.6%
🔥38.11%
😢12.70%
🤯12.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2025 to 28 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Sept 2025, 12:54 UTC36 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @es_and_egoVideo

Друзья, выкладываю запись нашей камерной встречи про "Работу мечты"

👍1

6 Sept 2025, 12:39 UTC62 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Доброе слово и кольт гораздо эффективнее просто доброго слова или причинение добра per rectum … Шел десятый год терапии. Клиент, человек за сорок, до сих пор жил со своей мамой, мотался на нелюбимую низкооплачиваемую работу (полтора часа в один конец), на пятом году терапии окончательно забросил свое хобби (писал музыку, но она никому не была понятна, никому не была нужна), поругался со своей девушкой. Он говорил:

👍31

29 Aug 2025, 10:44 UTC49 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Если бы я была детективщиком, я бы написала книжку о психотерапевте, который избавляет своих клиентов от страха смерти самой буквальной встречей с ней. Такая вот экспозиция. Помните сцену в дайнере из "Малхолланд Драйв"? Там разговаривают психотерапевт и клиент. Клиент, такой густобровый мужчина, рассказывает свой страшный сон о том, как он сидит в этом дайнере с психологом, как психолог подходит к кассе, оборачивае

👍3🔥1

17 Aug 2025, 14:12 UTC41 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Когда-то, уже почти двадцать лет тому назад, я проходила терапию у женщины-танатотерапевта. Терапия была не без проблем, у нас были двойные отношения (она была моим работодателем). И закончилось все плохо. Но я не об этом. Однажды я приехала на сеанс, но кабинет был закрыт. Звоню ей. Она говорит: "Я еще около университета. Давай лучше перенесем сеанс". А мне было как-то не очень хорошо, да и университет был вроде ка

2👍2

2 Aug 2025, 17:26 UTC46 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Захотелось написать про одну известную поэтессу. Она недавно дала трехчасовое интервью, которое полностью было посвящено разоблачению ее мужа-абьюзера. Ничего удивительного вроде, тема модная, более того, тема, на которую «нельзя молчать» и все прочее. А удивительное, тем не менее, все же есть. После интервью подавляющая часть аудитории перешла на сторону мужа и обвинила в абьюзе саму поэтессу. И тут интересно подум

👍21

27 Jul 2025, 13:11 UTC44 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Если в критической ситуации никто из близких не помог, естественно возникает злость на них. Какое-то время злишься, потом начинаешь думать: "Да они правда не могли. Они и не обязаны мне помогать". Злость в этот момент проходит, но появляется безнадежность. Эта безнадежность связана с осознанием одиночества перед лицом неприятностей. С тем, что никто не придет, не поддержит. И это вроде как шаг к взрослению, но с дру

2👍1

19 Jul 2025, 17:18 UTC48 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Примерно лет сто назад на одном психологическом ресурсе увидела интересное противоречие. В одной теме человеку с психическими проблемами советовали расширять круг друзей, мол при социальной изоляции в его случае прогноз неблагоприятный. И убеждали, что подружиться – это очень просто, достаточно куда-нибудь в интернет написать. Прямо вот буквально куда ни напишешь – везде толпы единомышленников, куча понимания и приня

1👍1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @inside_in_sight. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,409,339 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“inside_in_sight” (@inside_in_sight), 19 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inside_in_sight.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.