Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 18 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 717–733 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 17:15
719
-5
10 Sept 2026, 22:19
724
-7
2 Sept 2026, 02:23
731
no change
2 Sept 2026, 01:45
731
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
511 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
251
49.1%
👍
135
26.4%
⚡
74
14.5%
👏
34
6.65%
💯
17
3.33%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 511 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2025 to 28 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 20 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @insafs_articles. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 May 2025 to 28 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Qavha ichishni yoqtiraman.
Shunchaki yoqtirmayman, balki, har kuni 1 ta chashka ichmasam boshim og'rib qoladigan darajada yoqtiraman)
Qahva ichish madaniyati O'zbekistonda endi-endi shakllanmoqda. Bir statistika o'qigandim AQSHda 73% odam kunni qavha bilan boshlarkan.
Ularda bu bo'yicha juda katta bozor shakllangan. Bizda 5% ham chiqmasa kerak. Ularning ham aksariyati o'zi uyda tayyorlab qahva ichishadi.
Qahvaga …
Kitob nega doimiy o’qiladi?
Ma’lumot olish, sohada rivojlanish va yanada yangi marralarga erishish uchunmi?
Fikrimcha yo’q.
Kitobni doimiy o’qishdagi eng katta o’rganiladigan ko’nikma bu - distiplina.
Ma’lumot olish, sohada rivojlanish uchun turli kurslar, podcastlar, video darslar kitobdan tezroq foyda beradi ham.
Lekin kitobda shunday ma’lumotlar bor-ki, ularni boshqa yerdan topolmaysiz.
Aynan shuning uchun h…
Ukam suhbatda yaqinda eshitganim bir hikoyani eslatdi:
Qarg’a va chumchuq birga uchib ketishayotganini ko’rgan odamlar hayron bo’lib ularni kuzatishdi.
Yerda qo’ngandan keyingina nega ular birga uchgani ayon bo’libdi. Ularning ikkisi ham cho’loq edi. Ularni umumiylashtiruvchi jihat bor edi.
40 kuncha oldim jamoadagi bollar bilan kelishib bir nechta odatlarni shakllantirishni kelishib olgandik.
Alhamdulillah bugun…
Yo'l uzoq, juda uzoq.
Men esa yurishni endi boshladim.
Eng qizig'i bu uzoq yo'l nisbiy. Boshqa uchun uzoq yo'l, men uchun shu yerda tugashi mumkin. Yoki teskarisi.
Buni esa bilib bo'lmaydi.
Har qadam ortida hikmat yashirin. Anglagan anglab boraveradi, har qadamdan hikmat oladi va yo'l oxirida baxtli ekanini sezadi.
Anglamagan insonni yo'li ham albatta tugaydi. Lekin yo'l tugaganida anglamagan yo'lda bo'lganini h…
“Nimani xohlaysan?”
“Hech narsani xohlamaslikni xohlayman…”
Bu gapni birinchi o‘qiganimda oddiy qabul qilgandim. Hatto biroz g‘alati ham tuyulgandi.
Lekin keyin tushundim bu so‘zlar ortida haqiqiy erkinlik va ichki mustaqillik yashirin ekan.
Chunki biz xohishlarimiz tufayli bezovta bo‘lamiz.
Juda ko’p narsani xohlaymiz va
shu xohishlar bizni doimiy “Bir narsa yetmayapti” degan ichki holatda ushlab turadi.
Xohish…
Qizimga xat...
"Umuman sen haqingda ma’lumotim yo’q bo’lganda, hali uylanmasdanoq senga xatlar yozishni boshlagandim. Mana bugun endi shu xatlarga yozadiganlarimni o’zingga ham aytib bera olaman qizim."
@insafs_articles
Yolg’onga olib boruvchi eng qisqa yo’l bu - ko’p gapirish.
Sabablari juda oddiy.
1. Ko’p gapirgan odam har doim nima deganini yodda saqlay olmaydi.
Har doim yangi gap topish unda bosim hosil qiladi. Gap topish uchun ba’zan haqiqat bo’lmagan gaplarni ham ishlatadi.
2. Ko’p gapiradigan odamda e’tiborni tortishga moyillik ham kuchliroq bo’ladi.
Har doim e’tibor markazida bo’lish, hamma mavzuda gaplasha olish bilan …
"Hattoki qahva ham tayyorlashga vaqting bo'lmasa-da, kundalik fikrlarni yozib borishing shart" Naval Ravikant
Kitobni o'qiganimda shu joyiga uncha e'tibor bermagan ekanman. Bugun ayolim zo'r iqtibos ekan deb ko'rsatib qoldi.
Haqiqatdan bir qarashda sodda. Lekin ichiga kirsangiz juda keng ma'no bor.
Qahva tayyorlashga vaqti bo'lmagan odam qanday bo'ladi? Juda ham band, ishlari ko'p va charchagan.
Naval aynan shund…
O’rnak bo’lish hisi
Yaqinda o’quvchilarim bilan 40 kunlik challenge boshlagandik.
Challenge shartiga ko’ra 40 kun telegram kanalda maqola yozish kerak edi. Mana bugun 29-kun. Shu 29 kun davomida har kuni yozdim.
Bunga sabab mag’lub bo’lgan odam to’lashi kerak bo’lgan jarima (100$) emas umuman.
Agar sabab shu bo’lganda allaqachon yozmay qo’ygan bo’lardim.
Har kuni yozishga majbur qilayotgan narsa o’rnak bo’lish h…
Ustozimdan kitob o’qish haqida so’raganimda “Kitob o’qishdan avval o’qishni boshlang” deb javob berganlari hali ham esimda.
Kitob o’qish uchun o’qishni boshlash kerak?
Shunday. Avval o’qishni boshlash kerak.
Bitta kitob o’qish oson. Har doim aytaman biror ishni bir marta qilishdan oson ish yo’q. O’sha ishni doimiy qilish aslida qiyinroq.
Kitob o’qishni doimiy qilishdan avval kichikroq narsalarni o’qishni o’rganis…
O’sish tan olishdan boshlanadi.
Daromadimni 3 barobar oshishiga eng katta sabab o’zimni yaxshi bilmasligimni tan olish bo’lgan.
Avvallari ichimda bari bir ko’p narsani bilaman, ishimda ham boshqalardan yaxshiroqman degan fikrim bo’lardi. Turkiyada 4-5 oy yashaganimdan keyin musofirchilikni o’zi ancha tarbiyalab qo’ydi.
Musofirda juda ko’p vaqt o’zim bilan o’zim bo’ldim. O’zim bilan gaplashishga vaqtim bo’ldi. Tan o…
Ertaga yoz?
2025-yilning yarmiga keldik. Yil boshida qo'yilgan rejalar qanday ketyapti?
Maqsadlarga erishilyaptimi? Bahor oyi qanday o'tdi?
Javobga qarab keyingi holatingizni tahmin qilsa bo'ladi.
Bahor oyi qanday o'tganini, qaysi maqsadlarga erishib, qaysilariga ozgina yetmaganini aytib berganlar katta ehtimol yozni ham shu tempda o'tkazadi.
Bahor qanday o'tganini bilmaganlar esa katta ehtimol bilan yozni ham s…
👍8⚡6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @insafs_articles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Abdulloh Domla Mp3 @Abdulloh · 36,197 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Insaf’s articles” (@insafs_articles), 719 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/insafs_articles.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
