Channel
@inomirj
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,331subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001654526378 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @inomirj |
| Created | 4 May 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/inomirj |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:40 | 1,331 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 1,331 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (2 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,535 |
| Reactions total | 341 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Вот некоторые авторы рассказывают, как и что пишут, "эстетику" подбирают, героев вдохновенно описывают (боже, я понимаю, что вы в них влюблены, но вы же спойлерите!) Я так не умею. Я умею только барабанить по клавиатуре, а потом, перечитав и испытав лютый испанский стыд, думать: ну, это в целом исправимо. Наверное.
Дела грибные обстоят.
Уединенницы непосредственно из минских лесов
Мой неразменный экземпляр приехал 📚 Есть такая писательская примета: когда выходит новая книга, нужно купить ее лично на свои деньги в магазине и никому-никому этот экземпляр не отдавать. Тогда продажи лучше будут 😄 Кто не знал - советую всегда так делать
Подписчица Виталина сделала обалденный фан-тизер к "Вьюркам" 🤩 Спасибо! https://www.instagram.com/reel/DavCs56TAya/?igsh=bmZ5N2VhOHN5ODZl
А вы тоже замечали, что самые страшные кадры в остросюжетных фильмах выглядят примерно так?
Я дождалась. И оно того стоило! Тихоходки объединяют!
Video message, posted without a caption
Итак, мой топ-5 в сборнике РЕШ "Дачники" (не от первого к последнему, а просто как они идут в содержании): Майя Кучерская "Заольшье" Леонид Юзефович "Излучистая, лучистая" Сергей Носов "Аутентичность" Андрей Никоноров "Фон" Елена Колина "Девочка на даче" Ещё хочется отдельно отметить рассказы Дениса Драгунского, Владимира Березина и пьесу Аси Володиной. Отличный сборник! Я промотала всего пару-тройку рассказов, а я у…
Пссст, народ, на ВБ я со скидкой 💸 Вьюрки. Наш двор. Дарья Бобылёва. Мистика, фольклор. Книга Издательство АСТ https://www.wildberries.ru/catalog/998076486/detail.aspx?size=1492804155
В "Читай-городе" у дома меня нет. И вообще никого из наших нет, кроме нескольких сборников ССК, ютящихся на нижней полке "ужасов и мистики". Вокруг Кинг, Кинг, Кинг, Кинг, местами Хилл. Таши Граус, Аши Раус и комиксы в количестве. Придётся онлайн свой неразменный экземпляр заказывать. Можно тоже податься в молодежное фэнтези, взять псевдоним Ло Ра или Хетсу Киш (никто не догадается). И почему до сих пор нет таблиц "Т…
Кстати, как же часто в "Дачниках" фигурируют ДТП. В смысле дома творчества писателей. Сколько в литературе, оказывается, nepo babies, как нынче принято называть представителей династий. У меня династия свернула не туда, и всё раннее детство я провела в ДТК у композиторов. Это были лучшие годы домов творчества, наверное, с тех пор я и полюбила заброшки. Та дача сгорела от обогревателя, в этой проваливается пол. Ура, н…
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @inomirj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 356,156 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дарья Бобылёва💢Ход грибной королевы💢” (@inomirj), 1,331 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inomirj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.