Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

innerworld2000

@innerworld2000

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

115subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001445501677
TypeChannel
Username@innerworld2000
Descriptionmultimedia workshop (beta)
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/innerworld2000

Growth

1159 Aug 2026, 11:03 — 115 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 11:15 — 115 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 11:039 Aug 2026, 11:15
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 114–116 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 11:15115no change
9 Aug 2026, 11:03115first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 11 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.6%
avg views ÷ 115 subscribers
Avg views / post
49.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
8.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held19 (11 February 202626 July 2026)
Views total49
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
235
Videos
15
Links
47

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 12s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

105 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51929092623968853693836.2%
3634.3%
🔥98.57%
🥰87.62%
🤔76.67%
🎉32.86%
👌21.90%
10.952%
😱10.952%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 13:41 UTC49 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

bl1ndat3 - painful summer Годный микстейп получился у моего кента Феди. И по совместительству поздравляю с первым релизом на кассетах. https://t.me/bl1nddat3/1035

3custom 51929092623968853691

28 Jun 2026, 06:15 UTC109 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Как вам на самом деле удобней слушать музыку?

  1. Кассеты (есть магнитофон)18%
  2. CD-диски (есть плеер)6%
  3. mp3, wav, flac, итд (храните локально где-то)62%
  4. Стриминги (спотифай, саундклауд, итд)62%

The shares total 148%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Jun 2026, 04:06 UTC146 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

B.O.C. - INFERNO "Introit" / "Prophecy at 1420 MHz" — 4/5 "Hydrogen Helium Lithium Leviathan" — 4/5 "Age of Capricorn" — 3/5 "Father and Son" — 4/5 "Somewhere Right Now in the Future" — 5/5 🩷 "Naraka" — 5/5 🩷 "Acts of Magic" — 4/5 "Memory Death" — 5/5 🩷 "The Word Becomes Flesh" — 4/5 "Into the Magic Land" — 4/5 "Blood in the Labyrinth" — 4/5 "Deep Time" — 5/5 🩷 "All Reason Departs" — 3/5 "Arena Americanada" — 4/5 "T

11

10 Jun 2026, 06:46 UTC154 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

А вот и подарок самому себе на мой день рождения! Йей! 🌟🌟 Пока мне в нём всё нравится. Буду дальше юзать.

custom 5192909262396885369131

2 Jun 2026, 16:47 UTC333 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

М Е Л А Н Х О Л И Я Сделано на мастер-классе Сени и Маши (17.05.26) 😔 #Коллаж 💠 innerworld2000 💠

custom 51929092623968853695

2 Jun 2026, 09:03 UTC138 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

С началом лета вас, ребята! ☀️

🥰8

14 May 2026, 06:17 UTC187 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @bl1nddat3Video

dream come true

custom 51929092623968853695

29 Apr 2026, 16:08 UTC246 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Нашёл у себя в папке. Кусок одного тизера для блатхаты и по совместительству проба пера в подобную эстетику. 2021 г. 📼 #Видео

🔥8

22 Apr 2026, 14:16 UTC236 viewsread 9 August 2026

вижу как перед глазами пишется история https://youtu.be/I9h6fJg-KoA?si=BMCvg3kK56qiY8ZJ

22 Apr 2026, 13:56 UTC322 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

"Срочное включение от Минаско. Сорян что прерываю молчание, но......" СКОРО ВЫЙДЕТ НОВЫЙ АЛЬБОМ BOARDS OF CANADA. INFERNO 29 МАЯ ЭТОГО ГОДА Ждём всем иннерворлдом! 🥹😱

7🔥1😱1

31 Mar 2026, 06:39 UTC219 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

выложили для тт что-то вроде первого тизера из опубликованных выше кружков. мы скоро покажем вам больше, когда будем готовы. - мина и ански

custom 519290926239688536941

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @innerworld2000. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jun 2026, 06:15 UTCFinal Results34 voters

Как вам на самом деле удобней слушать музыку?

  1. Кассеты (есть магнитофон)18%
  2. CD-диски (есть плеер)6%
  3. mp3, wav, flac, итд (храните локально где-то)62%
  4. Стриминги (спотифай, саундклауд, итд)62%

The shares total 148%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 26 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 695,393 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“innerworld2000” (@innerworld2000), 115 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/innerworld2000.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.