Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Психологиня | Инна Слод

Channel

Психологиня | Инна Слод

@innaslod

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

240subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001564126561
TypeChannel
Username@innaslod
DescriptionЯ клинический психолог, КПТ-терапевт. Помогу тебе остановить переедание и справиться с РПП. Наладить отношения с собой и своим телом. Вернем тебе свободу в еде и жизни. Веду психотерапевтические группы и верю в науку. Запись на консультацию @Inna_Slod
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/innaslod

Growth

2407 Aug 2026, 14:10 — 240 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:49 — 240 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:108 Aug 2026, 09:49
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 239–241 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 09:49240no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:10240first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 31 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
389
Videos
31
Links
12

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

237 reactions across 12 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7632.1%
🦄2510.5%
❤‍🔥239.70%
🎉208.44%
🥰187.59%
🔥177.17%
😍177.17%
😱83.38%
62.53%
😁62.53%
🍾52.11%
👍52.11%
👨‍💻31.27%
💔31.27%
💯31.27%
custom 546753855515894352510.422%
🎄10.422%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 237reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2026 to 1 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 12 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @innaslod. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 January 2026 to 1 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Jun 2026, 13:08 UTC170 views7 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥3🎉2😍2

18 May 2026, 13:27 UTC234 views16 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Подумала, что может быть, нужно было мечтать вообще не работать 😁 но без любимой работы грустно, на самом деле.

😁6👍5👨‍💻31💯1

18 May 2026, 13:23 UTC228 views16 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Поняла, что об этом и мечтала 4 года назад. Не быть привязанной к месту работы. Увидели классные билеты, увидели только открывающийся отель 5* по смешным ценам, взяли ноут и полетели 🛫

😍8🍾52🦄1

27 Apr 2026, 19:30 UTC257 views18 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

В Москве выпал снег 🥰

❤‍🔥86🦄3custom 54675385551589435251

11 Apr 2026, 21:14 UTC292 views16 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

8❤‍🔥4🦄2🎄1🥰1

14 Mar 2026, 18:53 UTC366 views16 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сходила в кино на «К себе нежно» наедине с собой. Люблю книги Ольги Примаченко, теплые, умиротворяющие. Если смотреть, не прочитав книгу - ничего не понятно, скорее всего. Сюжет не гениален и много нестыковок. Но мне все равно было приятно 🥰 понравилось, что в зале было еще несколько девушек, кто пришел в кино без компании. Просто для себя 🩵

13🦄3

20 Feb 2026, 07:20 UTC406 views9 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Что думаете? Я злюсь и в растерянности. Ну как? Как кто-то может решать, что кому-то можно бить ЛЮДЕЙ?

😱62🦄1

16 Feb 2026, 09:44 UTC427 views36 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

8 лет назад срочно-срочно, пока не уехала в роддом, в час ночи покупала билеты в отпуск в перерывах между схватками. Той же ночью завивала волосы, доедала мороженое с клубникой - а то потом нельзя ведь будет, когда рожу 😁 Таксисту сказала «могли бы меня подвезти к приемному покою, а то я рожаю» и села смотреть рецепты в телефоне. Я помню эти встревоженные взгляды таксиста в зеркале заднего вида. Думаю, у него в гол

🎉16❤‍🔥9🥰8🦄3

13 Feb 2026, 07:12 UTC360 views16 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Марго Робби захейтили за внешность. Эту красотку. А этот хейт точно не связан с тем, что среди фотошопа, нейроаватаров, и фильтров мы стали забывать, как выглядят реальные люди? А теперь еще вопрос, о тебе. Требования к себе, к фигуре и внешности, устанавливаешь исходя из идеальных картинок или реальной жизни? Супер-мини-практика осознанности к своим убеждениям: Прямо сейчас закрой глаза и вспомни, чего ты от се

7🦄4💔3😱2

8 Feb 2026, 23:45 UTC327 views10 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

При этом, считаю важным заметить, что семаглутиды не являются средствами для лечения расстройств пищевого поведения и могут усиливать симптомы расстройств пищевого поведения. В моей практике есть ряд клиентов, которые прошли курс терапии семаглутидами, что спровоцировало усиление симптомов расстройств пищевого поведения, таких как усиление сверхценности веса, компульсивное переедание и формирование дезадаптивных ком

8🦄2

6 Feb 2026, 11:53 UTC356 views54 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я люблю этот день, можно выкладывать фоточки в свадебном платье. И пугает и немного печалит меня только одно: как эти 17 лет пролетели так быстро?👀

26🔥14🥰6❤‍🔥2🎉2💯2🦄2

31 Jan 2026, 11:07 UTC343 views23 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

9😍7🦄4🥰3

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @innaslod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 638,262 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психологиня | Инна Слод” (@innaslod), 240 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/innaslod.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.