Channel
@inkreados
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
131subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001950628039 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @inkreados |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 6 May 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/inkreados |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 131 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 131 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 6 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
48 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😱 | 19 | 39.6% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 31.3% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 10.4% | |
| 🤬 | 4 | 8.33% | |
| 🥴 | 3 | 6.25% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 2.08% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2023 to 12 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Otro martir asesinado por manos pedofilas que quieren exterminar a la raza blanca a base de mestizaje adoctrinal, abortos, homosexualizacion inducida, envenenamiento alimenticio, envenenamiento del aire con chemtrails, quimioterapias acidas y un sin fin: https://youtube.com/shorts/heeZ_BSHEwA?si=fSojZt-MSq0zGJGq
🥴3
JOSELE SANCHEZ ES OTRO NUEVO MARTIR - UN GUERRERO IMPLACABLE, JUSTICIERO Y DEFENSOR DE LA INFANCIA. SU CELEBRE FRASE QUE JAMÁS OLVIDAREMOS "LOS NIÑOS NO SE TOCAN". Descanse en paz nuestro gran guerrero de LUZ. https://t.me/+IUu4K_aliIdmYzQ8
👏3
Video, posted without a caption
👍2
🔴Y por que trataron de asesinarlo esta mañana? Obvio habla contra Bill Gates y compañia.
👍3
❤️❗️En memoria de los médicos fallecidos por abrirle los ojos a la humanidad. @INKREADOS
👍6
@INKREADOS
🇦🇺 ¿QUIÉN ES EL SACERDOTE DE SYDNEY QUE FUE APuñalado? El obispo Mar Mari Emmanuel, recientemente atacado durante su sermón en Sydney, ganó notoriedad por sus opiniones antivacunas y sus duras críticas a los confinamientos, comparándolos con la "esclavitud masiva". Con 290.000 seguidores en Facebook, se convirtió en un punto focal para muchos durante la pandemia. El incidente del apuñalamiento atrajo rápidament…
ritual satánico contra este cristiano y hacen creer que fue un accidente: https://elcaso.elnacional.cat/es/noticias/cura-zaragoza-muere-quemado-vela-iglesia-misa_1190366102.html
😱1
Atención a esto. La cuñada del líder republicano Mitch McConnell era la máxima dirigente de la compañía naviera propietaria del buque que chocó contra el puente de Baltimore. La tal Ángela Chao murió seis días antes del accidente, en extrañas circunstancias, concretamente ahogada cuando su coche se cayó a un lago, supuestamente porque conducía borracha. Ya sabéis, uno de esos "accidentes". https://twitter.com/America…
CANAL MARTIRES: https://t.me/+YlxIFRZaMxYzZGM0
😱2
El ufólogo Max Spiers fue encontrado muerto en extrañas circunstancias. Los periódicos dijeron que había muerto por causas naturales, pero aquellos que estuvieron con él horas antes de su muerte, dicen haberle visto vomitar dos litros de un LÍQUIDO NEGRO no identificado. Black goo? Lo encontraron muerto, poco antes de dar una conferencia donde iba a exponer información comprometida para el gobierno.
👏2🔥1
Al igual que Avicii; los cantantes Chris Cornell y Chester Bennington(el del grupo Linkin Park, que también fue abusado de pequeño), no se habrían suicidado. Tampoco el actor Paul Walker, habría muerto en un accidente, sino que todos habrían sido asesinados. Parece ser que a todos ellos los mataron por tener información valiosa y detallada sobre lo que sucedía en las altas esferas políticas y empresariales. https://…
😱5
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @inkreados. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MARTIRES” (@inkreados), 131 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inkreados.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.