Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Inkless Pen

Channel

The Inkless Pen

@inklesspenblog

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,436subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001166432248
TypeChannel
Username@inklesspenblog
Created4 September 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/inklesspenblog

Growth

1,4341,4361,4356 August 2026 — 1,434 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,434 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,436 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,434–1,436 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 13:481,436+2
7 Aug 2026, 18:581,434no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:311,434first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.8%
avg views ÷ 1,436 subscribers
Avg views / post
285
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (24 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total5,690
Reactions total110
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

110 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3128.2%
🙏2018.2%
🔥1816.4%
💯1210.9%
1110.0%
😢1110.0%
👏43.64%
🤮32.73%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 110reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC104 viewsread 6 August 2026

And elsewhere in the news, the Roman church continues its deconstruction of Christianity. Do you think this will be officially rebuked by the Roman powers, since it was officially promoted by a Latin Bishop? https://infovaticana.com/en/2026/08/04/the-rainbow-catholic-network-takes-over-the-comarca-lagunera-with-pro-lgbt-bishops/

6 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC88 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @orthodoxvoice_ua

А team was contacted by the wife of Father Andriy Denysenko, a priest of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. According to her, on June 25, 2026, Father Andriy was detained at the Bykivnia checkpoint by patrol police officers and taken to the Dniprovskyi TRC. He was assigned to the 3rd Separate Assault Brigade, where he underwent military training. Father Andriy last contacted his family on July 26. After that, according

🙏2

5 Aug 2026, 18:56 UTC194 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

The USA is the only country to have dropped atomic bombs. Aug. 6th and 9th were the days that they were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Nagasaki was a Japanese city with a large Christian population. Here is a thought provoking article on the subject. https://politicsrights.com/nagasaki-atomic-bombing-christian-crossroads/

😢3

1 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC408 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Well worth reading - An interview with Fr. George Calciu of blessed memory. "I think the devil is the winner in any compromise. This compromise made by the churches saved nothing! Perhaps it saved the walls, but it did not save the souls." https://www.orthodoxtalks.com/father-george-calciu/

7

31 Jul 2026, 21:29 UTC361 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

“Woe to those who bow to force, allowing destruction which will never be accepted in history. I have said these things to you because I am a priest. And because we are priests we obey the command of God which says that a burning light cannot be hid under a bushel but must shine before all (cf. Matt. 5:15) … There is a continual battle between good and evil, between right and wrong, between freedom and captivity of id

🔥15👍4

30 Jul 2026, 20:44 UTC338 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

A new post is up on my blog! Read it here - https://inklesspen.blog/2026/07/30/social-trauma-dr-fauci-covid-mandates-the-church-and-forgiveness/

🙏10👍4💯1

29 Jul 2026, 18:33 UTC314 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

“I provided in a past post, and will repeat it here, the information pertaining to how the FDA has been exposed in trafficking in aborted baby parts for research. The very FDA “approving” the modern “life-saving” injection. Dr. Fauci and company have been explicitly involved in funding research utilizing aborted babies. In a story that could have been from the annals of Josef Mengele, Dr. Fauci and company grafted ab

😢2

29 Jul 2026, 18:30 UTC230 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Back in 2021 I pointed to this in one of my articles (below this post) https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/fauci-played-a-role-in-study-that-grafted-aborted-baby-scalps-onto-rats/?utm_source=daily-2026-07-28&utm_medium=email

🤮3

29 Jul 2026, 17:04 UTC222 viewsread 6 August 2026

https://www.racket.news/p/wednesday-830-am-et-live-commentary?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1042&post_id=208836032&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=dx5km&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

29 Jul 2026, 17:04 UTC242 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Below are two articles touching upon the Fauci diaries. As more reliable information comes out, it is quite clear that the covid 19 response was planned and controlled, and not for the "good of humanity." Fauci is a terrible man. But he is the man who led the way with the covid mandates. It was this lead that many in the Church world followed (unquestionably). When some folks and clergy questioned the source and its

👏4👍3🔥3

28 Jul 2026, 20:00 UTC508 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

AI is not here to be an assistant, it is here to control. https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/ai-companies-destroying-rare-books

3💯3👍1

27 Jul 2026, 17:46 UTC284 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

The above report exemplifies why the petition (previously posted) is worth signing. Sadly, the EP and GOARCH are actively supporting the powers that are persecuting Ukrainian Orthodox clergy.

💯6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @inklesspenblog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,220,527 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Inkless Pen” (@inklesspenblog), 1,436 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inklesspenblog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.