Channel
@inkdemonskisser
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2subscribers
-24 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003832386661 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @inkdemonskisser |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/inkdemonskisser |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 2 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 1 | -26 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 27 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 26 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 26 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
169 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5051019180912936993 | 62 | 36.7% | |
| custom 5384214630543432242 | 24 | 14.2% | |
| custom 5253527838107148658 | 23 | 13.6% | |
| custom 5240048714608838151 | 18 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5445000877481960063 | 17 | 10.1% | |
| custom 5244449385344947037 | 12 | 7.10% | |
| custom 5327924432679746487 | 8 | 4.73% | |
| 🕊 | 5 | 2.96% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🖤🖤 𖦆 ִ у них осталось ִ__𓈒 ִ ˙ 𓋜۪ ࿙ 🤩 𓈒 ۫ ׄ по 2 желания 𝆹𝅥 𓈒 .ִ 🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 @inkdemonskisser
custom 52535278381071486584custom 50510191809129369932custom 53842146305434322422custom 52400487146088381511custom 53279244326797464871custom 54450008774819600631
Sticker, posted without a caption
🤩🤩 ִ ּ.𝆹🎞🎞 ֗ ݄ ˖ 🎞.ᐟ.ᐟ ּ. 🤩🤩 погнали экстравагантные работы) 𝆹𝅥🫤ִ ּꪆ୧ @inkdemonskisser ᛝִ. !! 🤎🤎 ^
custom 50510191809129369938custom 52535278381071486584custom 53842146305434322424custom 52400487146088381511
Sticker, posted without a caption
🤩🤩 ࣯ 𝇂𝇂𝇂 𝇄ִִ۫ ⎯ֺ ִ 𓈒ּ ๋꒰ ִ🤩🤩🤩🤩 ✦ּ ׄ ›﹢ ּ 🤩🤩 сравнение ручек) 🤩🤩 мне лапы у ЧД особенно нравятся 🤩🤩🤩ּ ๋꒰ ִ ✦ּ ׄ @inkdemonskisser›﹢ ּ ִ‹3 ּ
custom 50510191809129369937custom 53842146305434322424custom 54450008774819600633custom 52400487146088381511
Sticker, posted without a caption
Я сейчас перечитываю это, и наверное это звучало как бред ахахах простите, я имела тогда ввиду то, что верю в теорию о бесконечности вселенной, мультивселенных и в то, что где то на просторах этого бесконечного пространства по любому существует Чернильный Демон, мол знаете, в бесконечности в самом деле может существовать что угодно. И мне эта мысль приятно греет душу
custom 50510191809129369936custom 52400487146088381512
Дейле ближе скорее даже характер ангела воителя или хранителя, который умудрился слишком ожесточиться
custom 50510191809129369936custom 52444493853449470373custom 53842146305434322422
Меня забавляет, кстати, эта эстетика, которая на первый взгляд даёт впечатление якобы Дейла реально ангелочек, которого Чернильный демон опорочил, но на самом деле она всегда была с гнильцой, и в дуо с чд ее характер "падшего" ангела вышел изнутри наружу. Хотя с другой стороны, она может даже не столь падший ангел, сколь настоящий, если судить по трактование их как существ, которые имеют абсолютно иные от людей морал…
custom 50510191809129369936custom 53842146305434322422custom 52535278381071486581
Я немного отредактировала эдит, чтобы смотрелся гармоничнее, а то в процесс создания была немного не в состоянии трезво оценить результат 🖤🖤
🤩🤩 🔗🔗⛓️ 🤩🤩🪽arkness drowns the light in its 🤩🤩 depts 🥩🥩 📍 @inkdemonskisser 🤩🤩
custom 53842146305434322429custom 53279244326797464875custom 50510191809129369932🕊1custom 52400487146088381511custom 52444493853449470371custom 52535278381071486581
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @inkdemonskisser. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“(ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ*.✧” (@inkdemonskisser), 2 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inkdemonskisser.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.