Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Info 👁️ Stream 🎭🇵🇸

@infostream2022

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

12subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001561272529
TypeChannel
Username@infostream2022
Description🧄
Created18 January 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/infostream2022

Growth

127 August 2026 — 12 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11–13 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:4612no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:3512first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 5 February 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
7,870
Videos
3,710
Links
3,170

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 23s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2024 to 6 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Feb 2024, 11:07 UTC22 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @QudsNenVideo

Israeli helicopters dropped threatening leaflets over Rafah, demanding Palestinians to cooperate by providing information about Israeli detainees in Gaza.

6 Feb 2024, 11:07 UTC19 viewsread 12 August 2026

Oh look, those leaflets again that the Zionazi aparthied genocidal, illegal occupational entity drops on their open air concentration prison camp thing that they forced the Gazan's into (those that didn't die in 1948), that they call a warning before they carpet bomb women and children in their so called "designated safe zones". isnotreal is pathetic.

6 Feb 2024, 11:00 UTC10 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @QudsNenPhoto

The Israeli Ministerial Committee has approved a bill that prohibits the denial of the October 7 attack, punishable by imprisonment for up to 5 years. The bill specifies that any attempt to "deny or downplay" the attack will result in a 5-year sentence in Israeli prisons.

6 Feb 2024, 11:00 UTC10 viewsread 12 August 2026

Isnotreal wants to imprison you for saying the truth that thay were not responsible from their 76 plus years of crimes against humanity, yianni, you know, that vacuum thang.

6 Feb 2024, 02:15 UTC8 viewsread 12 August 2026

Fuck isnotreal, isnotrealies and all other KIKES that continue to walk this Earth.

6 Feb 2024, 02:10 UTC8 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @thecradlemediaVideo

Jewish settlers curse and spit at German Abbot Nikodemus Schnabel while walking in occupied Jerusalem (Al-Quds). Schnabel is the Abbot of the Benedictine Abbey Dormitio in Jerusalem, where Christians and clergymen are harassed by settlers and soldiers on a daily basis. Last year, he was told by a by a staff member of the 'Western Wall Heritage Foundation' to take off his cross. In a post on X, he confirmed that th

5 Feb 2024, 20:45 UTC6 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ResistancetoastVideo

The IDF is detaining children, these people are sick. What are they going to do to this child..? @ME_Corridors @Al_Qassam_Toast

5 Feb 2024, 19:34 UTC6 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @OnfrabmusicPhoto

💥The most tense month of Ramadan in the history of Israel is coming - leader of the opposition of Netanyahu's govt Lapid Meanwhile, keep updated Subscribe to @WW3INFO ✅

🤣1

5 Feb 2024, 19:34 UTC7 viewsread 12 August 2026

Lapid.... You are still a KIKE like the rest of them. Death to you as well. Fuckin KIKE.

5 Feb 2024, 19:32 UTC6 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @BattlefieldInfoVideo

Absolutely fantastic 😊 cow slurry into a cop station - that fits! French people have revolution DNA @ResistanceDefender 🪬

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @infostream2022. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Info 👁️ Stream 🎭🇵🇸” (@infostream2022), 12 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infostream2022.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.