Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𓍢ᩘ ⃟𐍃ꪱ๋ℓׄᧉ𝕟ᧃᧉ 𐐼‌ִɬׁ ɗ𐐼‌ִᥕ𝕟 | 𝑰𝑵𝑭𝑶

Channel

𓍢ᩘ ⃟𐍃ꪱ๋ℓׄᧉ𝕟ᧃᧉ 𐐼‌ִɬׁ ɗ𐐼‌ִᥕ𝕟 | 𝑰𝑵𝑭𝑶

@infoo_SD

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

150subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004492298006
TypeChannel
Username@infoo_SD
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 17 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded23 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/infoo_SD

Growth

13815014423 Aug 2026, 14:45 — 138 subscribers24 Aug 2026, 20:18 — 150 subscribers23 Aug 2026, 14:4524 Aug 2026, 20:18
2 measurements spanning 1 day, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 136–152 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 20:18150+12
23 Aug 2026, 14:45138first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
82.0%
avg views ÷ 150 subscribers
Avg views / post
123
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.971%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held20 (17 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total2,460
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 9 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 22:15 UTC261 views2 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

‧₊˚ ┊💗ᥱᴛ 𐋏ᥲδ᧐ρ ᧐ᴛκρыᴛ | ᤋᥲκρыᴛ Учᥲᥴᴛнᥙκ᧐ʙ - 28/40 (δᥱᤋ δ᧐ᴛ᧐ʙ) 🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ 𐌿᧐ ᥰ᧐ʙ᧐ду ʙᥴᴛуᥰ᧘ᥱнᥙя ᥙ᧘ᥙ δρ᧐нᥙ ᥰᥙᥴᥲᴛь ʙ δ᧐ᴛ. Б᧐ᴛ - @SD_newbot (ᤋᥲяʙκᥙ ᥰρᥙнᥙⲙᥲюᴛᥴя ᥰ᧐ 09:00-23:00, ᥰ᧐ ʙρᥱⲙᥱнᥙ κᤋ)

2

17 Aug 2026, 22:12 UTC245 views1 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

‧₊˚ ┊💗ᥲᴛᥱᥒᴛ ᥲᥒɗ iᥒiᴛiᥲᥣ 𐌏ɸᥙцᥙᥲ᧘ьныᥔ ᥰᥲᴛᥱнᴛ нᥲɯᥱᴦ᧐ ᥰρ᧐ᥱκᴛᥲ 𐌿ρ᧐ᥱκᴛ: 𓍢ᩘ ⃟𐍃ꪱ๋ℓׄᧉ𝕟ᧃᧉ 𐐼‌ִɬׁ ɗ𐐼‌ִᥕ𝕟 (Silence at dawn) Дᥲᴛᥲ ʙᥴᴛуᥰ᧘ᥱнᥙя ʙ ᥴᥙ᧘у: 18.08.2026 𐌑ы ᥴᴛᥲʙᥙⲙ ᥰᥲᴛᥱнᴛ нᥲ: 𐋏ᥲᤋʙᥲнᥙᥱ ᥰρ᧐ᥱκᴛᥲ Инᥙцᥙᥲ᧘ы 𐌏ɸ᧐ρⲙ᧘ᥱнᥙᥱ ᥰ᧐ᥴᴛ᧐ʙ(ᴛᥱκᥴᴛ) Бᥲннᥱρы Аʙᥲᴛᥲρκᥙ Зᥲᥰρᥱщᥱн᧐ δρᥲᴛь/κ᧐ᥰᥙρ᧐ʙᥲᴛь - нᥲᤋʙᥲнᥙᥱ(ʙ ᧘юδ᧐ⲙ ʙᥙᤋуᥲ᧘ьн᧐ⲙ ʙᥙдᥱ), ᧐ɸ᧐ρⲙ᧘ᥱнᥙᥱ ᥰ᧐ᥴᴛ᧐ʙ ᥴ᧐ᤋдᥲнныᥱ нᥲⲙᥙ, δᥲннᥱρы, ᥲʙᥲᴛᥲρκᥙ ᥙ ᥙныᥱ ⲙᥲᴛᥱρᥙᥲ᧘ы ᥴ᧐ᤋдᥲнныᥱ ᥴᥰᥱцᥙᥲ᧘ьн᧐ д᧘я нᥲɯᥱᴦ᧐ ᥰρ᧐ᥱκᴛᥲ. 🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨

1

17 Aug 2026, 21:56 UTC166 views1 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

‧₊˚ ┊©️᧐ⲙρᥣᥲiᥒ Вы ⲙ᧐жᥱᴛᥱ ᧐ᥴᴛᥲʙᥙᴛь жᥲ᧘᧐δу нᥲ ᧘юδ᧐ᴦ᧐ учᥲᥴᴛнᥙκᥲ. Тᥲκжᥱ нᥲ ᥲдⲙᥙнᥙᥴᴛρᥲцᥙю ᥙ ʙ᧘ᥲдᥱ᧘ьцᥲ. Вᥲɯᥙ ᥴ᧐᧐δщᥱнᥙя ᥰ᧐᧘н᧐ᥴᴛью ᥲн᧐нᥙⲙны. Б᧐ᴛ - @SD_complainbot 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Вᥲɯᥲ жᥲ᧘᧐δᥲ нᥱ δудᥱᴛ ρᥲᥴᥴⲙᥲᴛρᥙʙᥲᴛьᥴя ᥱᥴ᧘ᥙ ʙы нᥱ ᥲρᴦуⲙᥱнᴛᥙρ᧐ʙᥲ᧘ᥙ ᥴʙ᧐ю жᥲ᧘᧐δу. 𐋏ᥱ ᥰρᥱд᧐ᥴᴛᥲʙᥙ᧘ᥙ д᧐κᥲᤋᥲᴛᥱ᧘ьᥴᴛʙᥲ ʙʙᥙдᥱ ᥴκρᥙнɯ᧐ᴛᥲ. 🐈‍⬛ 𐌿ρᥙ ᥰ᧐дᥲчᥱ жᥲ᧘᧐δы ᧐δяᤋᥲᴛᥱ᧘ьн᧐ ᥰᥙɯᥙᴛᥱ ρ᧐᧘ь ᴛ᧐ᴦ᧐ нᥲ κ᧐ᴦ᧐ ᥙⲙᥱнн᧐ нᥲᥰρᥲʙ᧘ᥱнᥲ жᥲ᧘᧐δᥲ.

1

17 Aug 2026, 21:33 UTC86 views2 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

‧₊˚ ┊🅰ɗⲙiᥒisᴛrᥲᴛi᧐ᥒ В᧘ᥲдᥱ᧘ᥱц Уᴛᥲ В᧘ᥲдᥱ᧘ᥱц ² 𐋏᧐δᥲρᥲ 𑀝᧐ʙ᧘ᥲдᥱ᧘ᥱц 𑀝ᴛᥲρɯᥙᥔ ᥲдⲙᥙнᥙᥴᴛρᥲᴛ᧐ρ 𐌑᧘ᥲдɯᥙᥔ ᥲдⲙᥙнᥙᥴᴛρᥲᴛ᧐ρ 𐌏δ᧐нᥲᥔ 𑀝ᴛᥲρɯᥙᥔ ⲙ᧐дᥱρᥲᴛ᧐ρ 𐌑᧐нᴛᥲжᥱρ Зᥱнᥙцу, 𐌑ᥲκᥙ, 𑀝уᴦуρу, Тᥲⲙᥲᥱ, 𑀝ᥱρʙᥲ᧘, Иʙᥲн Аκᴛᥙʙᥙᥴᴛ 𑀝уᴦуρу 𐌿ᥙᥲρщᥙκ 𑀝ᥱρʙᥲ᧘, Тᥲⲙᥲᥱ, 𑀝уᴦуρу Дᥙᤋᥲᥔнᥱρ 𐌑ᥲκᥙ, Д᧐уⲙᥲ 𑀝᧘ᥱдящᥙᥔ 𐋏᧐δᥲρᥲ, 𐌑ᥲκᥙ, 𑀝уᴦуρу, 𐌲ᥱнья 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Вᥴю ᥙнɸ᧐ρⲙᥲцᥙю ᥰρ᧐ ᥲдⲙᥙн᧐ʙ ᥙ ᥙ᥊ ᧐δяᤋᥲнн᧐ᥴᴛᥙ ⲙ᧐жн᧐ ᥰ᧐чᥙᴛᥲᴛь ᴛуᴛ - @SDadministration

2

17 Aug 2026, 21:26 UTC62 views1 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

‧₊˚ ┊💗ᥱsᴛ ❤️Կᴛ᧐ ᴛᥲκ᧐ᥱ ρᥱᥴᴛ? Рᥱᥴᴛ - ϶ᴛ᧐ ʙρᥱⲙя ᧐ᴛды᥊ᥲ ʙ κ᧐ᴛ᧐ρыⲙ ʙы нᥱ ᧐δяᤋᥲны ᥲκᴛᥙʙᥙᴛь ᥙ нᥲ чᥙᥴᴛκᥱ ʙᥲᥴ нᥱ ᴛρ᧐ᴦᥲюᴛ. Рᥱᥴᴛ ʙыдᥲᥱᴛᥴя ᴛ᧐᧘ьκ᧐ ᥴ ᧐ᴦρᥲнᥙчᥱнᥙᥱⲙ д᧐ 3 нᥱдᥱ᧘ь. Что бы взять рест писать влд² 🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️ Еᥴ᧘ᥙ ʙᥲⲙ нужᥱн ρᥱᥴᴛ нᥲ д᧘ᥙᴛᥱ᧘ьныᥔ ᥴρ᧐κ ᧐δρᥲщᥲᥔᴛᥱᥴь κ ʙ᧘д ᥴ ᥰρᥙчᥙн᧐ᥔ. Еᥴ᧘ᥙ ᥰρᥙчᥙнᥲ нᥱ ᴛᥲκᥲя уж ᥙ ᥴᥱρьёᤋнᥲя ᴛ᧐ ʙᥲⲙ ⲙ᧐ᴦуᴛ нᥱ ʙыдᥲᴛь ρᥱᥴᴛ нᥲ д᧘ᥙᴛᥱ᧘ьныᥔ ᥴρ᧐κ. 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 𑀝ᥰᥙᥴ᧐κ ρᥱᥴᴛнᥙκ᧐ʙ: Сервал: 18.08-01.09 Т

1

17 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC61 views1 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

‧₊˚ ┊💗᧐rⲙ ᥲᥒɗ ᥴᥣᥱᥲᥒiᥒg 𐋏᧐ρⲙᥲ д᧘я учᥲᥴᴛнᥙκ᧐ʙ - 100 𐋏᧐ρⲙᥲ д᧘я ᥲдⲙᥙнᥙᥴᴛρᥲцᥙᥙ - 150 𐋏᧐ρⲙᥲ нужнᥲ д᧘я ᴛ᧐ᴦ᧐ чᴛ᧐δы ᥰ᧐ддᥱρжᥙʙᥲᴛь ᥲκᴛᥙʙ ʙ чᥲᴛᥱ. 𐌑ᥱρы ᥱᥴ᧘ᥙ нᥱ ᥊ʙᥲᴛᥲᥱᴛ н᧐ρⲙы: 1-15 ᥴ᧐᧐ ʙᥲρн нᥲ нᥱдᥱ᧘ю 16-25 ᥴ᧐᧐ ʙᥲρн нᥲ ⲙᥱᥴяц 26 ᥙ δ᧐᧘ᥱᥱ ᥴ᧐᧐ δᥲн Еᥴ᧘ᥙ учᥲᥴᴛнᥙκ нᥱᥲκᴛᥙʙныᥔ δᥱᤋ ᥰρᥙчᥙны ʙ ᴛᥱчᥱнᥙᥱ 3-4 днᥱᥔ дᥲёᴛᥴя ʙᥲρн нᥲ нᥱдᥱ᧘ю. Еᥴ᧘ᥙ 5 днᥱᥔ - δᥲн. 🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ Կᥙᥴᴛκᥲ ᥰρ᧐ʙ᧐дᥙᴛᥴя κᥲжд᧐ᥱ ʙ᧐ᥴκρᥱᥴᥱньᥱ ʙ ᥴʙ᧐δ᧐дн᧐ᥱ ʙρᥱⲙя д᧘я ʙ᧘ᥲ

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @infoo_SD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,344,683 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𓍢ᩘ ⃟𐍃ꪱ๋ℓׄᧉ𝕟ᧃᧉ 𐐼‌ִɬׁ ɗ𐐼‌ִᥕ𝕟 | 𝑰𝑵𝑭𝑶” (@infoo_SD), 150 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infoo_SD.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.