Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐™€๐™๐™•๐˜ผ ๐Ÿ•ท๏ธ

Channel

๐™€๐™๐™•๐˜ผ ๐Ÿ•ท๏ธ

@infoerza

On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

27subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002373542570
TypeChannel
Username@infoerza
Created22 November 2024 โ€” measured โ€” dated from the channelโ€™s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 November 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/infoerza

Topic

Other / unclassifiable โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

242725.511 August 2026 โ€” 25 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 25 subscribers25 August 2026 โ€” 24 subscribers17 September 2026 โ€” 26 subscribers2 November 2026 โ€” 27 subscribers11 August 20262 November 2026
5 measurements spanning 84 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 24โ€“27 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Nov 2026, 20:5627+1
17 Sept 2026, 10:1626+2
25 Aug 2026, 00:5424-1
11 Aug 2026, 10:0325no change
11 Aug 2026, 08:1925first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 22 November 2024 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,145 reactions across 9 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
customย 518857314501920405031127.2%
customย 547420967875171196824421.3%
๐Ÿ”ฅ23520.5%
๐Ÿคฉ907.86%
๐Ÿ˜453.93%
โค342.97%
๐Ÿ‘312.71%
customย 5188506422702257398272.36%
โšก272.36%
๐Ÿ’‹242.10%
๐Ÿฅฐ201.75%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ151.31%
๐Ÿ’ฏ151.31%
๐Ÿ†131.14%
๐Ÿ’˜80.699%
๐ŸŽ‰60.524%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id โ€” no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegramโ€™s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 1,145 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 22 November 2024 to 1 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
127
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for ยท 7%
Most on one post
127
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @infoerza. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 November 2024 to 1 July 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Jul 2025, 06:08 UTCโ‰ˆ3,860 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

โค5๐Ÿคฉ2

18 Jun 2025, 02:12 UTCโ‰ˆ4,310 views259 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

โœฆ Sedikit saran & kritik Copas aja yaa @iRaib โ”โ”โ”โœฆโ”โ”โ” โญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธ Fast respon, proses cepat, aman & trusted. Order di @iraib super puas, recommended! ๐Ÿ–ค โญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธ Admin ramah, harga bersahabat, hasil memuaskan. Fix next order lagi di @iraib ๐Ÿ”ฅ

customย 518857314501920405096customย 547420967875171196870๐Ÿ˜33customย 518850642270225739827โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ15๐Ÿฅฐ7๐Ÿ”ฅ6๐Ÿ†5

18 Jun 2025, 02:12 UTCโ‰ˆ3,320 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

25 May 2025, 04:17 UTCโ‰ˆ5,080 views407 reactions127 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

โœฆ Sedikit saran & kritik (tenang, nggak galak) Copas aja yaa ZEPETOBLACK @TOPUPKANN โ”โ”โ”โœฆโ”โ”โ” โญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธ Anti ribet dan instan banget! Awalnya ragu, ternyata seaman dan secepat itu. Recommended parah @topupkann! ๐Ÿš€ โญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธ Harga juara, responnya super kilat. Adminnya baik banget, langsung masuk gak pakai lama. Langganan terus di @topupkann! โœจ โญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธ Asli terpercaya, no tipu-tipu. Prosesnya hitungan menit langโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ”ฅ162customย 518857314501920405076๐Ÿคฉ68โšก27โค15๐Ÿ’ฏ15๐Ÿ˜12๐Ÿ†8

25 May 2025, 04:02 UTCโ‰ˆ4,530 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

โค1

25 May 2025, 04:00 UTCโ‰ˆ4,570 views289 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

โœฆ RNK males ngetik? Aman. Langsung copas: Erza. @abahh โ”โ”โ”โœฆโ”โ”โ” Jangan beli di sini duluโ€ฆ takutnya betah dan males pindah tempat ๐Ÿ˜Œ โœฆ Murah, aman, trusted. Tenang kayak chat dibales โ€œotwโ€. Lebih nagih dari rebahan sambil scroll FYP jam malam.

customย 5474209678751711968108customย 518857314501920405089๐Ÿ”ฅ53๐Ÿ‘17โค8๐Ÿคฉ8๐ŸŽ‰6

25 May 2025, 03:27 UTCโ‰ˆ3,710 views62 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

.

customย 518857314501920405024customย 547420967875171196816๐Ÿ’‹10๐Ÿ”ฅ6๐Ÿฅฐ5โค1

25 May 2025, 03:26 UTCโ‰ˆ3,180 views114 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

.

customย 547420967875171196850customย 518857314501920405026๐Ÿ’‹14๐Ÿคฉ11๐Ÿ”ฅ8โค3๐Ÿ‘2

25 May 2025, 03:25 UTCโ‰ˆ2,620 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

โค1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @infoerza. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ€” Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐™€๐™๐™•๐˜ผ ๐Ÿ•ท๏ธโ€ (@infoerza), 27 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infoerza.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.