Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐•€๐•Ÿ๐•—๐•  ๐•”๐•™๐•’๐•Ÿ๐•–๐• ๐•–๐•™...

Channel

๐•€๐•Ÿ๐•—๐•  ๐•”๐•™๐•’๐•Ÿ๐•–๐• ๐•–๐•™...

@infoehkrapkaua

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

8subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004380954202
TypeChannel
Username@infoehkrapkaua
Created25 June 2026 โ€” measured โ€” dated from the channelโ€™s first post
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/infoehkrapkaua

Growth

787.514 August 2026 โ€” 7 subscribers15 August 2026 โ€” 7 subscribers12 September 2026 โ€” 8 subscribers14 August 202612 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 29 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 7โ€“8 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 03:398+1
15 Aug 2026, 01:567no change
14 Aug 2026, 09:037first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
34s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

29 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค1344.8%
๐Ÿ’˜1034.5%
๐Ÿฅฐ310.3%
๐Ÿ’‹13.45%
๐Ÿ”ฅ13.45%
๐Ÿฆ„13.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 29 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jun 2026, 19:11 UTC119 views6 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฌ ๐‘Œ๐‘œ๐‘ขโŸ๐‘Ž๐‘›๐‘‘ ๐‘š๐‘’, ๐‘œ๐‘ŸโŸ"๐‘ค๐‘’"๐Ÿšฌ ๐‘Šโ„Ž๐‘’๐‘› ๐‘ก๐‘ค๐‘–๐‘™๐‘–๐‘”โ„Ž๐‘ก ๐‘“๐‘Ž๐‘™๐‘™๐‘ โŸ๐‘Ž๐‘›๐‘‘ ๐‘”๐‘’๐‘›๐‘ก๐‘™๐‘ฆ ๐‘’๐‘š๐‘๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘’๐‘  ๐‘ข๐‘ ๐Ÿšฌ ๐‘‚๐‘ข๐‘Ÿ โ„Ž๐‘’๐‘Ž๐‘Ÿ๐‘ก๐‘  ๐‘๐‘ข๐‘Ÿ๐‘ ๐‘ก ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก๐‘œ ๐‘—๐‘œ๐‘ฆ๐‘“๐‘ข๐‘™ ๐‘๐‘™๐‘œ๐‘œ๐‘š๐Ÿšฌ โœจโœจโœจโœจโœจโœจโœจโœจ โœจโœจ๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฌ โœจโœจ๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฌ ๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฌ๐ŸšฌMy Hyuna

โค2๐Ÿ’˜2๐Ÿฅฐ1๐Ÿฆ„1

27 Jun 2026, 10:27 UTC114 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ Your opinions about me: You can write whatever you want here.๐Ÿชฆ ๐Ÿ–ค๐Ÿ–ค๐Ÿ–ค

๐Ÿ’˜3

27 Jun 2026, 10:23 UTC106 views2 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

โค1๐Ÿ”ฅ1

27 Jun 2026, 10:10 UTC105 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Poll

๐™’๐™๐™ค ๐™–๐™ง๐™š ๐™ฎ๐™ค๐™ช ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™ข๐™š?๐Ÿชฆ

  1. ะ”ั€ัƒะณ/ัะปะฟััˆะบ ๐Ÿชฆ55%
  2. ะ›ัŽะฑะธั‚ะต ะผะตะฝั ๐Ÿชฆ55%
  3. ะ—ะฝะฐะบะพะผั‹ะน ๐Ÿชฆ27%
  4. ะะตะฝะฐะฒะธะดะธั‚ะต ะผะตะฝั ๐Ÿชฆ18%
  5. ะ’ะธะดะตะปะธััŒ ะฒะพ ั„ะปัƒะดะฐั… ั€ะฐะฝัŒัˆะต (ัะพั‡ัƒะฒัั‚ะฒัƒัŽ ะปะพะป) ๐Ÿคฉ9%
  6. ะะฝ ๐Ÿชฆ0%
  7. ะฅะพั‚ะธั‚ะต ะดั€ัƒะถะธั‚ัŒ ๐Ÿชฆ0%

The shares total 164%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

๐Ÿ’˜2โค1

27 Jun 2026, 09:59 UTC99 views5 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Kinnslist๐Ÿชฆ ะ”ะปั ะฝะตะดะฐะปั‘ะบะธั…: ะงะธะธะบะฐะฒะฐ ั‚ะฐะผ ะฟะพ ะฟั€ะธะบะพะปัƒ. โญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธ โญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธ ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ

โค2๐Ÿ’˜2๐Ÿฅฐ1

26 Jun 2026, 14:46 UTC114 views6 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

My dearest friends ๐Ÿคฉ I love you ๐Ÿฉธ ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ Tikva, Seokimyy, ะ”ะฐะฝัŒะพ, dzuye, ะะทะธะทะฐ, Hikari4, hairyfairy ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ

โค3๐Ÿ’‹1๐Ÿ’˜1๐Ÿฅฐ1

25 Jun 2026, 20:33 UTC96 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ—ป๐Ÿ—ป๐Ÿ—ป๐Ÿ—ปแด‡สœ/แด€สŸษชแดษดแด€ ๐Ÿฅ€๐Ÿฅ€ ๐Ÿฅ€๐Ÿฅ€ ๐Ÿคฉ ๐Ÿคฉ ๐Ÿชฆ แด€ส™แดแดœแด› แดแด‡: ๐Ÿ•ท๏ธ ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ MBTI: ENTJ 1w9 so1sp5so3 LVFE๐Ÿชฆ Temperament: Choleric - Melancholic๐Ÿคฉ Sodiac: Taurus ๐Ÿชฆ ๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฌ ๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฌ 17 y.o. 14.05 ๐Ÿชฆ Ideology: ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Nationalist ๐Ÿชฆ Moral Alignment: True Neutral๐Ÿชฆ ๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฌ ๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿšฌ

โค3

25 Jun 2026, 20:29 UTC94 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026

ะ’ะะ–ะ›ะ˜ะ’ะž: ะฏะšะฉะž ะฆะ•ะ™ ะะšะะฃะะข ะ—ะะะฅะžะ”ะ˜ะขะฌะกะฏ ะฃ ะ’ะะจะ˜ะฅ ะšะžะะขะะšะขะะฅ, ะะ›ะ• ะฏ ะะ• ะ„ ะ’ะะจะ˜ะœ ะ”ะ ะฃะ“ะžะœ/ะกะ†ะœ'ะ„ะฎ ะะ‘ะž ะฃ ะ’ะะก ะะ• ะœะะ„ะขะฌะกะฏ ะะ†ะฏะšะžะ‡ ะŸะ ะ˜ะงะ˜ะะ˜ ะšะžะะขะะšะขะฃะ’ะะขะ˜ ะ—ะ† ะœะะžะฎ, ะ’ะ•ะ›ะ˜ะšะ• ะŸะ ะžะฅะะะะฏ ะ’ะ˜ะ”ะะ›ะ˜ะขะ˜ ะœะ•ะะ• ะ— ะ’ะะจะ˜ะฅ ะšะžะะขะะšะขะ†ะ’.

โค1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @infoehkrapkaua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Jun 2026, 10:10 UTCAnonymous Poll11 voters

๐™’๐™๐™ค ๐™–๐™ง๐™š ๐™ฎ๐™ค๐™ช ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™ข๐™š?๐Ÿชฆ

  1. ะ”ั€ัƒะณ/ัะปะฟััˆะบ ๐Ÿชฆ55%
  2. ะ›ัŽะฑะธั‚ะต ะผะตะฝั ๐Ÿชฆ55%
  3. ะ—ะฝะฐะบะพะผั‹ะน ๐Ÿชฆ27%
  4. ะะตะฝะฐะฒะธะดะธั‚ะต ะผะตะฝั ๐Ÿชฆ18%
  5. ะ’ะธะดะตะปะธััŒ ะฒะพ ั„ะปัƒะดะฐั… ั€ะฐะฝัŒัˆะต (ัะพั‡ัƒะฒัั‚ะฒัƒัŽ ะปะพะป) ๐Ÿคฉ9%
  6. ะะฝ ๐Ÿชฆ0%
  7. ะฅะพั‚ะธั‚ะต ะดั€ัƒะถะธั‚ัŒ ๐Ÿชฆ0%

The shares total 164%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐•€๐•Ÿ๐•—๐•  ๐•”๐•™๐•’๐•Ÿ๐•–๐• ๐•–๐•™...โ€ (@infoehkrapkaua), 8 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infoehkrapkaua.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.