Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Центр информационной грамотности

Channel

Центр информационной грамотности

@infocentr_vilena_inshina

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

832subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001308573729
TypeChannel
Username@infocentr_vilena_inshina
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/infocentr_vilena_inshina

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

832839835.56 August 2026 — 839 subscribers6 August 2026 — 839 subscribers12 August 2026 — 837 subscribers18 August 2026 — 834 subscribers25 August 2026 — 835 subscribers1 September 2026 — 834 subscribers10 September 2026 — 835 subscribers18 September 2026 — 832 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 43 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 831–840 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 01:19832-3
10 Sept 2026, 02:39835+1
1 Sept 2026, 02:04834-1
25 Aug 2026, 05:11835+1
18 Aug 2026, 18:47834-3
12 Aug 2026, 05:35837-2
6 Aug 2026, 15:05839no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:04839first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

51 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2447.1%
❤815.7%
💯611.8%
🔥611.8%
😢35.88%
🤡23.92%
😁11.96%
🙏11.96%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC23 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @narasputyeru

🏦О сути платформы «Учи.ру» Комментарий от подписчика: Мы ушли из школы на со. Нет сил терпеть этот беспредел. Как вспомню учи.ру, сразу ругаться начинаю. При открытии сайта тут же выскакивает: "шесть твоих одноклассников уже оформили платную подписку" Другими словами:"ты лох, что не смог уговорить своих родителей потратить деньги на эту развлекаловку". И эта надпись при каждом заходе на сайт, внушение ребенку, что …

👍1

6 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC24 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @narasputyeruPhoto

О сути платформы «Учи.ру»

5 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC52 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вы разве не видите, что это бот у меня завелся в канале, которому нужно вывести на диалог, чтобы потом что-то продать или склонить к каким-либо действиям? Почти каждый день удаляю подобные сообщения: то, давайте, я вам книгу пришлю, то аудио, то материалы. Развод это. Различайте. Не ведитесь.

💯4

4 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC48 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @uchitel_trezvostiFile

В чём истинный смысл известной фразы и кто её придумал на самом деле?

👍2

2 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC64 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ouzs_ru

Анекдот дня: Цифровой рубль создан не для слежки за россиянами, заверили в Совфеде. «Это всё делается для удобства и безопасности денег, которые вращаются в нашей стране и находятся на счетах у наших граждан», — заявил сенатор Артём Шейкин. 😂😂😂 Верим!

🔥4😁1

2 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC95 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Каюсь. Допустила ошибку. Прошлый пост репостнула в канал, прочитав только «по диагонали», не заметив важную манипуляцию сознанием. В чем дело? В сравнении - «TikTok казался приятным «почти как нар🐈». Когда мы в своей речи используем подобные фразы, особенно при детях, мы вводим их в заблуждение. Получается, что якобы «нар🐈🐈‍⬛» могут обладать каким-то «приятным эффектом». А это ложь, так как яды могут только разрушат…

❤6👍3

2 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC83 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сэм Альтман говорит, что у него развилась «зависимость» от TikTok»: Даже создатель чата GPT подсел на короткие видео. Глава OpenAI Сэм Альтман признался, что удалил TikTok, потому что приложение оказалось слишком затягивающим. Альтман рассказал, что сначала зашёл туда «по работе» - хотел разобраться в алгоритмах TikTok, тогда компания работала над похожим соцсервисом с AI-видео Sora. Но быстро подсел - начиналось вс…

❤1

29 Jul 2026, 17:46 UTC86 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @uchitel_trezvostiFile

Чем Трезвость отличается от воздержания? Полное видео придёт от меня в личку каждому, кто перейдёт по ссылке на мой бесплатный мини-курс: http://vk.cc/ctTkfz

❤1

29 Jul 2026, 17:45 UTC60 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @AALUKASH

Может ли быть такое? Это история подписчика... Данные изменены, естественно. Публикую в качестве профилактики. Важно знать. Превратил в рассказ. "Я — родитель Вечер. Мой сын в своей комнате. Слышно, как он смеётся. Говорит с кем-то. Радуется. Я думаю: «Хорошо. Ребёнок дома. Ребёнок занят. Ребёнок общается». Я не вхожу. Не спрашиваю. Не проверяю. Устал. Доверяю. Ну что там может случиться? Он просто играет. А …

😢3

26 Jul 2026, 19:30 UTC112 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Сегодня в Центре информационной грамотности прошла интеллектуальная встреча для взрослых. Интересно, о чем мы говорили? Темой этой встречи стал эксперимент «Вселенная-25» — это знаменитый опыт американского этолога Джона Кэлхуна, который он провёл в 1960–1970-х годах. Учёный хотел понять, что случится с сообществом животных, если создать для них абсолютно идеальные, «райские» условия: изобилие еды и воды, отсутстви…

👍2🔥2

25 Jul 2026, 15:03 UTC114 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @uchitel_trezvostiFile

Почему не работает сухой закон? Это фрагмент из беседы с Владимиром и Татьяной Осиной в Санкт-Петербурге. Разговор полностью

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @infocentr_vilena_inshina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Пенза * Новости * Важное
@Penza_vajnoe · 21,259
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 September 2026
ПЕНЗА | СОБЫТИЯ | НОВОСТИ
@Penza_nov · 22,251
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 September 2026
Пенза | События | Подслушано
@Penza_podslushal · 36,306
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 September 2026
Пенза | Интересное | Новости
@Penza_tut · 23,498
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 September 2026
СУРГУТ | СОБЫТИЯ | НОВОСТИ
@Surgut_nov · 21,581
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 23 September 2026
Сурский край Z
@sursk · 43,568
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Центр информационной грамотности” (@infocentr_vilena_inshina), 832 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infocentr_vilena_inshina.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.