Channel
@infobyprocrastinator
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004484701155 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @infobyprocrastinator |
| Created | 20 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/infobyprocrastinator |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 4 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 4 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (20 June 2026 – 25 July 2026) |
| Views total | 73 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
⋆ ｡ ˚ ❟ ‘ ꒱ ❟ 𓂃 ꩜ ۫ ⋆ ༘ • ˖ 𝒫𝒪𝒮𝒯 ℳ𝒰𝒯𝒰𝒜ℒ ⋮. ˚ . :: ℐ'𝓂 𝓁𝒾𝓀ℯ 𝓂𝓊𝓉𝓊𝒶𝓁: - ℐ 𝓅𝓊𝓉 𝓇ℯ𝒶𝒸𝓉𝒾ℴ𝓃𝓈 𝓉ℴ 𝓅ℴ𝓈𝓉𝓈 - ℐ ℴ𝓃𝓁𝓎 𝒸ℴ𝓂𝓂ℯ𝓃𝓉 𝒾𝒻 𝓉𝒽ℯ𝓎 𝒸ℴ𝓂𝓂ℯ𝓃𝓉 𝒾𝓃 𝓇ℯ𝓈𝓅ℴ𝓃𝓈ℯ - ℐ 𝒟𝒪𝒩'𝒯 𝓂𝒶𝓀ℯ 𝓇ℯ𝓅ℴ𝓈𝓉𝓈 (ℯ𝓍𝒸ℯ𝓅𝓉𝒾ℴ𝓃: ℐ'𝓂 𝓂ℯ𝓃𝓉𝒾ℴ𝓃ℯ𝒹 𝒾𝓃 𝓉𝒽ℯ 𝓅ℴ𝓈𝓉) ♱ ˚ ₊ ˙ . 𓏼 ⩇⩇:⩇⩇ ⋆ ℱℴ𝓇 𝓂𝓎 𝒸ℴ𝓃𝓋ℯ𝓃𝒾ℯ𝓃𝒸ℯ, ℐ 𝓀𝒾𝓃𝒹𝓁𝓎 𝒶𝓈𝓀 𝓂𝓊𝓉𝓊𝒶𝓁 𝓉ℴ 𝓇ℯℊ𝒾𝓈𝓉ℯ𝓇 𝓊𝓃𝒹ℯ𝓇 𝓉𝒽𝒾𝓈 𝓅ℴ𝓈𝓉. ˚ ﹏ ° ❟ ｡ 𝓊𝓈ℯ𝓇𝓃𝒶𝓂ℯ/𝓉ℊ𝒸｡ ❟ ° . ‿ . ‿ . ‿ .
🤩‘Wɦ᧐ ᥲrᥱ y᧐ᥙ ᴛ᧐ ⲙᥱ?🎀🎀
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Sticker, posted without a caption
🥹🥹𝓈𝒽ℯ/𝒽ℯ𝓇🥹🥹 ✏️✏️: 05.10 🤩 🥹@wweqif🥹🥹 ✏️✏️✏️: (𝒹ℴ 𝓃ℴ𝓉 𝒾𝓃𝓉ℯ𝓇ℯ𝓈𝓉𝒾𝓃ℊ) ❤️🥹𝒟ℯ𝓁ℯ𝓉𝒾𝓃ℊ 𝓂ℯ𝓈𝓈𝒶ℊℯ𝓈 𝒾𝒻 ℐ 𝒹𝒾𝒹𝓃'𝓉 𝓇ℯ𝓈𝓅ℴ𝓃𝒹 𝒾𝓂𝓂ℯ𝒹𝒾𝒶𝓉ℯ𝓁𝓎. 𝒞𝓇𝓎𝒾𝓃ℊ, 𝒷𝓊𝓉 𝓃ℴ𝓉 𝓈ℴ𝓁𝓋𝒾𝓃ℊ 𝓎ℴ𝓊𝓇 𝓅𝓇ℴ𝒷𝓁ℯ𝓂𝓈. 𝒯𝒽ℯ 𝒾𝓂𝓅ℴ𝓈𝒾𝓉𝒾ℴ𝓃 ℴ𝒻 𝒶𝓃𝓎 𝓅ℴ𝓈𝒾𝓉𝒾ℴ𝓃 𝒾𝓃 𝒶𝓃𝓎 𝒻𝒾ℯ𝓁𝒹. ℐ𝓃𝓈𝓊𝓁𝓉𝒾𝓃ℊ 𝒾𝓈 𝓁𝒾𝓀ℯ 𝒶 𝒸ℴ𝓂𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓉𝒾ℴ𝓃 𝓈𝓉𝓎𝓁ℯ. 𝒩ℴ𝓉 𝒷ℯ𝒾𝓃ℊ 𝒶𝒷𝓁ℯ 𝓉ℴ 𝒷ℯ 𝒽𝒶𝓅𝓅𝓎 𝒻ℴ𝓇 ℴ𝓉𝒽ℯ𝓇 𝓅ℯℴ𝓅𝓁ℯ'𝓈 𝓈𝓊𝒸𝒸ℯ𝓈𝓈ℯ𝓈. "𝒮ℯ𝓁𝓁 𝓉𝒽ℯ ℊ𝒾𝒻𝓉."⭐️
🪦✏️ℯ𝓁𝒸ℴ𝓂ℯ🎀✨ ✉️𝓎 𝓃𝒶𝓂ℯ 𝒾𝓈 𝒦𝒾𝓇𝒶🎀🌟 🎀🎀🎀 🍓🎀𝒷ℴ𝓊𝓉 𝓂ℯ:: 🤩18 𝓎.ℴ , ℯ𝓃𝓉𝓅 🎀8𝓌7🍡 💋ℐ'𝓂 𝒶𝓃 𝒶𝓇𝓉𝒾𝓈𝓉, ℐ'𝓂 𝒸𝓇ℯ𝒶𝓉𝒾𝓃ℊ 𝓂𝓎 ℴ𝓌𝓃 𝒸ℴ𝓂𝓅𝓊𝓉ℯ𝓇 ℊ𝒶𝓂ℯ, ℐ'𝓋ℯ 𝒷ℯℯ𝓃 𝒹ℴ𝒾𝓃ℊ 𝓅𝓇ℴ𝒻ℯ𝓈𝓈𝒾ℴ𝓃𝒶𝓁 𝓈𝓅ℴ𝓇𝓉𝓈, ℐ'𝓂 𝒶𝓅𝓅𝓁𝓎𝒾𝓃ℊ 𝓉ℴ 𝒷ℯ 𝒶 𝓈ℴ𝒻𝓉𝓌𝒶𝓇ℯ 𝒹ℯ𝓋ℯ𝓁ℴ𝓅ℯ𝓇.❤️ ✏️✏️𝒯𝒾𝓂ℯ 𝓏ℴ𝓃ℯ: ℳℴ𝓈𝒸ℴ𝓌 🤩✉️𝓎 ✉️𝒶𝓃𝒹ℴ𝓂𝓈🤩 🥹ℛℯ𝓈𝒾𝒹ℯ𝓃𝓉 ℰ𝓋𝒾𝓁, 𝒟ℯ𝓋𝒾𝓁 ℳ𝒶𝓎 𝒞𝓇𝓎, 𝒢ℯ𝓃𝓈𝒽𝒾𝓃 ℐ𝓂𝓅𝒶𝒸𝓉, 𝒮𝓉𝒶𝓁𝓀ℯ𝓇, 𝒪𝓊𝓉𝓁𝒶𝓈𝓉, 𝒮ℯ𝓀𝒶𝒾, 𝒥ℴ𝒿ℴ, 𝒞𝒶𝓁𝓁 ℴ𝒻 𝒟𝓊𝓉𝓎 ℳ𝒲, 𝒮ℴ𝓊𝓉𝒽 𝒫𝒶𝓇𝓀 🎀✏️ℴℴ𝒹𝒷𝓎ℯ🎀 🤩arttgk🥹privattgk = edits 🤩
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @infobyprocrastinator. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🤩‘Wɦ᧐ ᥲrᥱ y᧐ᥙ ᴛ᧐ ⲙᥱ?🎀🎀
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 25 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 379,053 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𓈒ֺּׅ 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑟. 𓈒ֺּׅ 𓈒ֺּׅ ♡︎ ྀི༷ ᣟ݂ ۪۪ ⌣” (@infobyprocrastinator), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infobyprocrastinator.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.