Channel
@info_insightful
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
247subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001799182507 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @info_insightful |
| Description | Always seeking for an edge in the Airdrop, Defi, and Web3 space |
| Created | 2 September 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/info_insightful |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 247 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 247 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 2 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (2 September 2022 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 50 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
17 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 52.9% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 41.2% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2022 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The Current Airdrop Landscape Q3-Q4 2026 Being very selective about what Perps protocols you spend time on is becoming painfully apparent AFX got exploited yesterday Dango announced today that are shutting down ... despite saying "as we've always said airdrop will be in Q4" What I'm narrowing down on and why: variational_io - https://x.com/variational_io Clear winner, actually has a different PMF than HL and Lig…
Signed Insightful
https://x.com/info_insightful/status/2033613929662845388
Signed Insightful
https://x.com/i/status/2025746772942049624
Signed Insightful
Good read https://x.com/goodalexander/status/2018412061974249550
Signed Insightful
Giving away 8 WL for the free WORM nfts Interesting privacy protocol on mainnet ETH with deflationary + ponzi mechanics + utilizing EIP7503 Comment your EVM address in this post to participate. Winners will be contacted via DM on TG or on Twitter in ~24hrs NFTs gain XP the longer you hold them, and will determine your allo for the $WORM ICO on Cypher + they will apparently also give you an airdrop Minting is Jan …
❤7👍2👏1
Signed Insightful
Crypto/Web3 Slang cheat sheet Social Slang: AF/ASF – As f*ck FR – For real FYI – For your information ICYMI – In case you missed it IRL – In real life IYKYK – If you know you know NGL – Not gonna lie RN – Right now TBH – To be honest TMI – Too much information Culture & Behavioral: CT – Crypto Twitter DYOR – Do your own research FOMO – Fear of missing out FUD – Fear, uncertainty, and doubt HODL – Hold …
❤1👍1
Signed Insightful
Variational Points Update 15.76 points from only $51.8k volume Avg position time = 26hrs total positions = 35 Realized PnL = +$130 Strategy (still basically the same) = Sort pairs by OI pick the alts / pairs with the lowest OI 1x-2x leverage size is $500-$1k SL or TP of 7%-15% let the triggers hit, or close after 48hrs+ Trading Hold time + Lower OI pairs still clearly get a heavier points value There is prolly…
👍1
Signed Insightful
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Insightful
Scarcer Than Lighter: The Variational Point Drought Recent points distribution for @variational_io this past week was pretty rough, I've been seeing a lot of irritation and aggravation in chats from users But here is what we've learned, what I did personally and what I'm going to be doing moving forward and why: Trying to farm getting liquidated is -EV (doesn't give a big points boost worth the time or money lost)…
👍2
Signed Insightful
My take / mindset in selling airdrops Historically speaking (from like my 4yrs of seeing airdrops in the space) if your airdropped tokens are going to peak it will be within the first 24-48hrs after TGE It also has to be within a relatively bullish environment or you think there is a strong reason/ cabal to crime up the chart There are rare edge cases to this (HYPE, AVANT) but this happens literally less than 2% o…
❤1👍1
Signed Insightful / Jay
Messages in this channel will be automatically deleted after 1 month
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @info_insightful. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Insightful Insiders” (@info_insightful), 247 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/info_insightful.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.