Posted without readable text

Channel
Anuncios P2Point & iDC
@info_iDC
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,020subscribers
-55 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001824727298 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @info_iDC |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 26 October 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 20 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/info_iDC |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 6,020 | -18 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:06 | 6,038 | -11 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 6,049 | -22 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 6,071 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 6,075 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 October 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 59s
- Average length
- 59s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
971 reactions across 14 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 342 | 35.2% | |
| 🤨 | 127 | 13.1% | |
| ❤ | 117 | 12.0% | |
| 🌚 | 117 | 12.0% | |
| 🍌 | 100 | 10.3% | |
| 🥴 | 85 | 8.75% | |
| 🥱 | 22 | 2.27% | |
| 😈 | 19 | 1.96% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 1.34% | |
| 🕊 | 10 | 1.03% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 0.721% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 0.412% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.206% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.206% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.206% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.103% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.103% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 971reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2022 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 25
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 3
- of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
- Most on one post
- 23
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @info_iDC. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 October 2022 to 16 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
➖➖➖ ⚠️ ATENCIÓN ⚠️ 📝 Estamos probando un bot con miniapp para automatizar la publicación de ofertas en este canal. 📌 El servicio es totalmente gratis, y cualquier usuario de nuestra comunidad puede usarlo para publicar ofertas. 📌 El bot se encuentra en modo de prueba, por lo que es posible que presente errores o fallos en su funcionamiento. 📌 Por ahora, el bot no reconoce el estatus de los usuarios, es decir, no…
❤9👏5
➖➖➖ 📊 Indicadores en iDC Los indicadores representan diferentes datos de los usuarios en los mensajes automáticos del bot, tanto en las verificaciones como en los anuncios del canal. Para facilitar la lectura, se utilizan emojis que identifican cada tipo de información. El significado de cada indicador es el siguiente: 👑 Miembro VIP • Usuario evaluado por la administración con historial de negocios, reputación v…
👍2❤1
iDC — Declaración de Riesgos Información sobre los riesgos asociados al intercambio P2P.
iDC — Política de Privacidad Política sobre el manejo y protección de datos personales.
iDC — Política de Apoyo Discrecional Funcionamiento del programa de apoyo discrecional (DSP).
iDC — Política de Membresías Condiciones generales aplicables a las membresías dentro de iDC.
iDC — Términos de Servicio Términos generales que regulan el uso de iDC.
➖➖➖ ⚠️⚠️ ATENCIÓN ⚠️⚠️ Ante la reciente ola de hackeos en Cuba y la vulnerabilidad en la infraestructura de ETECSA, se han confirmado casos de SIM Swapping para robar cuentas de WhatsApp y Telegram. Los hackers están usando las cuentas de usuarios para ofrecer "ofertas flash" de Cripto y robar miles de dólares. Si el sistema de ETECSA está comprometido, tus SMS ya no son seguros. 👉 Los usuarios afectados por esto…
❤7👍5🔥1
➖➖➖ 🚷 Aviso importante sobre referencias escritas 👉 Las referencias escritas manualmente en el grupo de conversación dejarán de ser consideradas válidas. 👉 En los últimos días se ha detectado un incremento en el uso de multicuentas y referencias falsas, utilizadas por estafadores para generar una falsa sensación de confianza. Esto ha provocado confusión y riesgo real para la comunidad. 👉 Somos conscientes de que …
👍40❤11👎6🔥2
➖➖➖ 🖥 Guía rápida y recomendaciones ✔️ 1. Antes de operar, conoce el sistema: Lee la información del canal, comenzando por el mensaje fijado. No realices negocios si aún no entiendes cómo funciona iDC. ✔️ 2. Opera preferiblemente con usuarios VIP: Los usuarios VIP cuentan con historial dentro de la comunidad y han pasado por un proceso de evaluación interno. ✔️ 3. Las membresías ofrecen funcionalidades adicionale…
❤4👎1🤣1
➖➖➖ ⚠️ Negocios a través de terceros (puentes e intermediarios) Cuando una transacción involucra a terceros que envían o reciben los fondos, el riesgo puede aumentar y pueden surgir conflictos si no se aclara desde el inicio. Si en un negocio no eres tú quien envía o recibe directamente los fondos, debes informarlo antes de cerrar el trato. El uso de múltiples intermediarios también puede generar problemas como r…
🌚16🤨15🍌14👍14🥴14❤5🥱5💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @info_iDC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@info_iDC named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@apkviajandoinfo · 107,782
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 20 August 2026
@eecav · 72,391
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 20 August 2026
@bolitacubanaofficial · 43,610
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Anuncios P2Point & iDC” (@info_iDC), 6,020 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/info_iDC.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.