Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for INFINITY

Channel

INFINITY

@infinity17serv

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

46subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002087448859
TypeChannel
Username@infinity17serv
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded16 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/infinity17serv

Growth

464746.516 Aug 2026, 21:45 — 47 subscribers16 Aug 2026, 22:00 — 47 subscribers17 Aug 2026, 17:15 — 46 subscribers16 Aug 2026, 21:4517 Aug 2026, 17:15
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46–47 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 17:1546-1
16 Aug 2026, 22:0047no change
16 Aug 2026, 21:4547first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 20 August 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

32 reactions across 3 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2475.0%
❤‍🔥26.25%
👍26.25%
😢26.25%
🥰26.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 20 August 2024 to 16 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Sept 2024, 20:29 UTC476 views0 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ramirez_CartelPoll

Кто получит 100 рублей?

  1. Mars_Infinity (17 сервер)51%
  2. Logan_Dell 12 srv49%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Sept 2024, 19:22 UTC471 viewsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ramirez_CartelPoll

Кто заберёт 200 рублей?

  1. Nikon_Advents 12 serv41%
  2. Vladimir_Fomin сервер 284%
  3. Danil_Mahmazonov 7 сервер3%
  4. Felix_Yakamozz(17серв)4%
  5. Skizzy_Avlod 21сервер8%
  6. Mars_Infinity (17 сервер)14%
  7. Vlad_Komorenko(05 сервер)5%
  8. Nursultan_Advents 12 серв4%
  9. Lord_Oldman, 12 сервер2%
  10. Logan_Dell 12 srv14%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Aug 2024, 21:00 UTC635 views17 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Ну что ребята я по вам скучал поэтому решил вернуться в мт) да ушёл я не надолго хотя думал что уйду на куда больше но все решилось быстрее и поэтому я возвращаюсь куда быстрее,да хоть меня и наебали на 86.000.000 но все же похуй,накоплю куда больше,а человек который кинул, думаю не долго ты поседишь с моими виртами) ну а на этом я хочу сказать всем спасибо тем кто меня ждал) С уважением Mars_Infinity

12❤‍🔥2🥰2👍1

20 Aug 2024, 19:56 UTC655 views14 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Удачи вам всем родные вы мои) надеюсь что скоро встретимся) удачи пацаны) и девчонки)❤️❤️❤️

11😢2👍1

20 Aug 2024, 18:54 UTC367 viewsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Существо просто нечего больше сказать ........

20 Aug 2024, 18:51 UTC352 viewsread 16 August 2026

Ну что) жду всех у азс которая у Ц.Р😊❤️

20 Aug 2024, 18:40 UTC341 views1 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Ну что осталось 20минут.........) жду всех ребятки)❤️❤️❤️

1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @infinity17serv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Sept 2024, 20:29 UTCFinal Results304 voters

Кто получит 100 рублей?

  1. Mars_Infinity (17 сервер)51%
  2. Logan_Dell 12 srv49%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Sept 2024, 19:22 UTCFinal Results438 voters

Кто заберёт 200 рублей?

  1. Nikon_Advents 12 serv41%
  2. Vladimir_Fomin сервер 284%
  3. Danil_Mahmazonov 7 сервер3%
  4. Felix_Yakamozz(17серв)4%
  5. Skizzy_Avlod 21сервер8%
  6. Mars_Infinity (17 сервер)14%
  7. Vlad_Komorenko(05 сервер)5%
  8. Nursultan_Advents 12 серв4%
  9. Lord_Oldman, 12 сервер2%
  10. Logan_Dell 12 srv14%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 20 August 2024 to 16 September 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Элвин · Матрешка РП
@elmatrp · 31,981
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 5 September 2026
Матрешка RP
@matrp_t · 112,375
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“INFINITY” (@infinity17serv), 46 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infinity17serv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.