Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

﹫𝘗𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘦𝘭 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘰 .

@inf0probel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

24subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003396650657
TypeChannel
Username@inf0probel
Created5 December 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/inf0probel

Growth

2412 Aug 2026, 15:03 — 24 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 23:57 — 24 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 15:0312 Aug 2026, 23:57
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23–25 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:5724no change
12 Aug 2026, 15:0324first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 5 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

446 reactions across 8 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🎄5011.2%
🏆4610.3%
custom 52444573095596202394510.1%
custom 5244730559673960650449.87%
custom 5242730681167021869439.64%
🦄408.97%
custom 5244552589114117034286.28%
🍾265.83%
🔥173.81%
🆒163.59%
💊132.91%
custom 5262799581577508191122.69%
custom 5285271408815933576122.69%
custom 524220203511739319092.02%
custom 524239953918850108392.02%
92.02%
👾81.79%
custom 528287028587426780471.57%
custom 527849940932627122261.35%
custom 528326866986077573461.35%

Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 446reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 December 2025 to 25 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
18
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
17
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @inf0probel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 December 2025 to 25 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 May 2026, 18:59 UTC473 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

все, кто меня ненавидит, я оповещаю, что Я готов извиниться по шаблону. прямо сейчас. 🙈🙈 голубого уебка никто не предупредил, что слово "рэпер" должно быть в свидетельстве о рождении. но прости, я был не прав все эти годы. твои шутки могут не нравится только долбоёбам. хочешь – приходи, и ещё разок меня отпизди. прости меня, дайвитз.. я понял, я – не Бог.. тронув твою игру.. видимо, я был не прав. но всё равно, вед

custom 526279958157750819112custom 52784994093262712226💊4

6 Mar 2026, 15:22 UTC≈1,220 views221 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤍 🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟 🌟 🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤩 🌟🌟🌟🌟 🍾 ] 🥹 🤩накомый/друг. 🏆 ] › ×ейтер! 🔥 ] 🥹 🔤отите подружиться /познакомиться. ⚡️ ] → 🐈раг? ( ненавидите меня ).) 🎄 ] 🥹 🌟остоите со мной в одном комьюнити. 👾 ] ‰ ☺️ывший друг. 🦄 ] 🥹 🌟росто прохожий. 🆒 ] # 🌟ой фанат. 🌟🌟 📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏 . . . 💊 | 🔇 ВЛЮБЛЕНЫ В МЕНЯ 🌟

🎄50🏆46🦄40🍾26🔥17🆒169💊9

5 Dec 2025, 21:39 UTC≈1,910 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

🌟 ₊ 0:16 ˙ 𓂃 、

custom 524445730955962023915custom 52852714088159335769custom 52427306811670218696custom 52423995391885010833custom 52828702858742678042custom 52832686698607757342

5 Dec 2025, 21:39 UTC≈1,900 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌟 | 🤩 𝖫𝗈𝗏𝖾-𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍 MY BITCHES ТУТ ЛИШЬ ИЗБРАННЫЕ 🌟 @ Сианта, Прокси, Имбирный, Дайвитз, Ирис . . . ⟡ 🌟орядок НЕ ИМЕЕТ значения🤩 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 😀𝗜𝗙 𝗬𝗢𝗨'𝗥𝗘 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗙𝗨𝗖𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗦𝗧𝗨𝗣𝗜𝗗, 𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗡 𝗬𝗢𝗨 𝗢𝗡𝗟𝗬 𝗚𝗢𝗧 𝗢𝗡𝗘 𝗖𝗛𝗢𝗜𝗖𝗘! 𝗠𝗘! 𝗩𝗢𝗫.. 𝗦𝗣𝗔𝗖𝗘 𝗣𝗢𝗣𝗨𝗟𝗜, 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗣𝗘𝗢𝗣𝗟𝗘'𝗦 𝗩𝗢𝗜𝗖𝗘!

custom 524473055967396065018custom 524455258911411703410custom 52427306811670218695custom 52828702858742678043custom 52852714088159335763

5 Dec 2025, 20:22 UTC≈1,720 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

🌟 ₊ 0:09 ˙ 𓂃 、

custom 524273068116702186915custom 52423995391885010836custom 52422020351173931905

5 Dec 2025, 20:17 UTC≈1,660 views38 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

🌟🤩 ➖𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗼𝗽𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗺𝗲 🤩 🤩 Я такой АХУЕННЫЙ 🪙 MON£Y 🤩 🔹десь Bы м.ожете озвучить с🔠оё восхитительное мнение обо мне. 🤩 "ОЧЕНb" Рад коNструктивной 🔤рUтiке . 🌟 УДЕТ ОЧЕНЬ ОБИДНО, ЕСЛИ ВЫ . . . ПРОЙДЁТЕ МИМО !!🥹🥹

custom 524455258911411703418custom 52444573095596202398custom 52447305596739606506custom 52422020351173931904custom 52427306811670218692

5 Dec 2025, 19:28 UTC≈1,520 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

🌟 ₊ 1:04 ˙ 𓂃 、

custom 524473055967396065011custom 52427306811670218695custom 52444573095596202394

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @inf0probel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,010,169 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“﹫𝘗𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘦𝘭 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘰 .” (@inf0probel), 24 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inf0probel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.