Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ИндюкС

Channel

ИндюкС

@indukkkks13

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

228subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002461684632
TypeChannel
Username@indukkkks13
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/indukkkks13

Growth

227228227.56 August 2026 — 227 subscribers7 August 2026 — 227 subscribers13 August 2026 — 228 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 227–228 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:15228+1
7 Aug 2026, 03:01227no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:48227first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 15 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

309 reactions across 9 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9932.0%
❤‍🔥4414.2%
👾3712.0%
🔥247.77%
💘206.47%
👨‍💻175.50%
🥰175.50%
🕊165.18%
🤩134.21%
🍓82.59%
👎51.62%
👍41.29%
💩10.324%
😐10.324%
🤣10.324%
🤬10.324%
🤮10.324%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 309reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Jul 2026, 12:17 UTC134 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @shinnosukemegaPhoto

один грех и сотни благих деяний

💘15🤩108👎1

10 Jul 2026, 22:22 UTC252 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Короче ребят, кто хочет, напишите мне в лс пж. Мне просто хочется поиграть с кем то🥺 @nastupaetnotch

🥰159👾4

10 Jul 2026, 21:59 UTC254 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Дорогие подписчики. Я вернулась только ради одного. Спросить вас. Кто нибудь хоет завтра в репо сходить поиграть? Мб в 19:00 по мск.

👨‍💻178🤩3

6 Jun 2026, 10:28 UTC261 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @purpleguy_zinePhoto

Пыльный коридор пиццерии тянулся бесконечной чередой выцветших плакатов и сломанных ламп. Воздух был густым, пахло горелым жиром и старым картоном. Где-то справа, за поворотом, скрипнул пол, кто-то переступал с ноги на ногу, стараясь не дышать. Чувствовался тяжелый, немигающий взгляд, пробирающий до дрожи. Пыль вилась вокруг ботинок, за этим местом что-то наблюдало. Кто-то живой сейчас улыбается в темноту коридора, п

12👾4👎1🤣1🤬1

9 May 2026, 16:00 UTC416 views72 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

неохраняемый #fnafau #rebornica

35❤‍🔥21👾11🍓3👎1💘1

25 Apr 2026, 03:28 UTC404 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kondrat_21

подписчики пишу максимально серьезный пост у меня случилась очень серьезная ситуация из-за которой мне сейчас очень страшно оставаться в своем доме я не буду сейчас вдаваться в подробности, потому что пока не готова я буду очень признательна если вы даже немного поможете мне материально на съем жилья я буду очень вам благодарна, если я смогу оправиться в ближайшие время и переехать и может отрисую для тех кто немного

🕊163

18 Apr 2026, 08:41 UTC460 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @purpleguy_zinePhoto

🤍 ИндюкС прячется в костюме Спрингбонни! 🎐 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ #PURPLEGUY_ZINE_ANNOUNCE

❤‍🔥1811👾6👎1💘1😐1

15 Apr 2026, 16:06 UTC≈6,220 views65 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

друзья у меня для вас только наброски к сожалению. #fnafau #badvice #fnaffanart

🔥24👾129❤‍🔥5👍4🍓3💘3🥰2

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @indukkkks13. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,085,998 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ИндюкС” (@indukkkks13), 228 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/indukkkks13.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.