Channel
@indiancryptoguide
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
536subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 13 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001381446916 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @indiancryptoguide |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/indiancryptoguide |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 02:00 | 536 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:22 | 538 | no change |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:47 | 538 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
151 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 93 | 61.6% | |
| 🔥 | 33 | 21.9% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 9.27% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 3.97% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.32% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 1.32% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 0.662% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2025 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#Bitcoin update BTC 80k$ I said our prediction for the top was around $125K–$140K, and I expected a rally from the $90K dip in January, but that didn’t happen. Now, this rally from $60K is difficult to predict. $60K could be the bottom and the start of the next cycle, or after a decent rally, BTC could crash again, as it still hasn’t reached a realistic bear-market price.
👍3
Signed Md Aslam
Withdraw all your funds if you use BitMart.
Signed Md Aslam
#FED: Interest rates remain unchanged, paused at 3.5%–3.75%. For a mega bull run, rates need to drop below 2%. The Chairman also mentioned that rate cuts are expected from July. As I said earlier, below 90k is bad news, and we’re still stuck there. Q1 😌 Let's see.
👍4
Signed Md Aslam
#Bitcoin Vitalik mentioned that quantum attacks on Bitcoin could be possible by 2028, which is a strong bearish signal, though any news about Bitcoin becoming quantum-resistant might trigger a pump. But if it falls below 90k, that would be really dangerous. ( #ETF money ll flow more when US prints $ so another leg-up ll be in Q1 #NFA)
👍5🙏2😨1
Signed Md Aslam
#WazirX The withdrawals not yet enabled! scams are still continuing! ( There is an option: If you are okay to sell, withdraw your INR and deposit somewhere else and buy same coins. ) or wait for sometime for better clarity.
❤6👍1
Signed Md Aslam
Yes, you will get your rebalanced tokens!. And I am not sure about withdrawal part. I will update once they announce officially.
👍1
Signed Md Aslam
Hi @mdaslamuklmas if wazix back we can get our coins ? Any idea on this ?
❤1
Signed 3R2T1E
#Altcoins This is the crash I mentioned and warned about in my last video. Whales played their game smartly. (This is a slow cycle, the money will rotate into other altcoins!)
🔥6
Signed Md Aslam
#BNB 1000$ 🚀
🔥5❤2
Signed Md Aslam
#FOMC 25 bps Rate Cuts to 4.25% from 4.5%. (Note: it has to come below 2% for a mega bullrun)
👍4❤2
Signed Md Aslam
#FOMC meeting tomorrow!
🔥2
Signed Md Aslam
XStocks on Blockchain🚀 predicted in 2022🚀 This is + and - for crypto. This is a big change in the crypto world after ETFs.
👍8🔥2
Signed Md Aslam
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @indiancryptoguide. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Indian Crypto Guide” (@indiancryptoguide), 536 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/indiancryptoguide.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.