Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Incredible India ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ

@indian

On this record: Topic ยท Observations ยท Also posting the same content ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

28,815subscribers

-58 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ€“31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001011919091
TypeChannel
Username@indian
DescriptionExplore Best of India and Indian. Our chat rooms: @Hindi @Tamil @Telugu Channel: @India Our bots @Robots
Created10 February 2016 โ€” measured โ€” cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded5 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/indian

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegramโ€™s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts โ€” open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@indian/724 ยท this entry15 Aug 2022, 10:00 UTC@india/45615 Aug 2022, 10:01 UTC1.0072 seconds
@india/45915 Aug 2023, 01:30 UTC@indian/727 ยท this entry15 Aug 2023, 01:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@india/4631 Jan 2025, 08:00 UTC@indian/731 ยท this entry1 Jan 2025, 08:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@indian/735 ยท this entry14 Dec 2025, 12:35 UTC@india/47214 Dec 2025, 12:36 UTC1.00under a minute
@indian/736 ยท this entry18 Dec 2025, 14:33 UTC@india/47318 Dec 2025, 14:36 UTC1.002 minutes
@india/47427 Dec 2025, 04:42 UTC@indian/737 ยท this entry27 Dec 2025, 04:42 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@india6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minuteeven

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp โ€” in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

โ€œPublished firstโ€ means first in this corpus. We hold 12 comparable posts for this entry, running 13 August 2020 to 1 January 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detectorโ€™s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @indian โ€” which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through โ€” we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channelโ€™s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable โ€” 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times โ€” 60%, no better than a coin flip โ€” because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channelโ€™s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying โ€” a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story โ€” and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

28,81528,87328,8445 August 2026 โ€” 28,873 subscribers6 August 2026 โ€” 28,869 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 28,868 subscribers8 August 2026 โ€” 28,859 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 28,849 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 28,841 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 28,829 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 28,815 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -58. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 28,806โ€“28,882 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:5328,815-14
11 Aug 2026, 16:1328,829-12
10 Aug 2026, 16:4228,841-8
9 Aug 2026, 16:2228,849-10
8 Aug 2026, 17:3428,859-9
7 Aug 2026, 17:3528,868-1
6 Aug 2026, 16:4628,869-4
5 Aug 2026, 18:1628,873first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 August 2020 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
437
Videos
38
Links
27

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโ€™s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 34s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

12,775 reactions across 20 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค6,21548.6%
๐Ÿ‘2,32718.2%
๐ŸŽ‰6785.31%
๐Ÿคฎ4303.37%
๐Ÿ’ฉ4083.19%
๐Ÿคฃ3923.07%
๐Ÿ”ฅ3622.83%
๐ŸŒ2672.09%
๐Ÿฅฐ2381.86%
๐Ÿ‘2291.79%
๐Ÿ‘Ž1901.49%
๐Ÿคฉ1641.28%
๐Ÿ˜1321.03%
๐Ÿ™1160.908%
๐Ÿซก1070.838%
๐Ÿคก850.665%
๐Ÿ˜830.65%
๐Ÿคฌ830.65%
๐Ÿคฏ580.454%
โšก430.337%
12 further kinds1681.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 12,775reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2020 to 1 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for ยท 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @indian. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 August 2020 to 1 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Jan 2026, 13:02 UTCโ‰ˆ180,000 views221 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿšฉ Happy New Year 2026! ๐ŸŽ† โœจ May this new year bring happiness, good health, and success to you all. ๐ŸŒŸ ๐Ÿ†”: @Indian | @India

โค156๐Ÿฅฐ20๐ŸŒ15๐ŸŽ‰8๐Ÿ‘8๐Ÿคก8๐Ÿ”ฅ6

27 Dec 2025, 04:42 UTCโ‰ˆ167,000 views100 reactionsread 12 August 2026

๐ŸŽ WEEK 4 GIFT ANNOUNCEMENT! The Christmas magic continues! ๐ŸŽ…โœจ Santa has dropped 1000 Toncoin ๐Ÿ’Ž for our lucky winners! ๐ŸŽ„๐ŸŽ ๐ŸŽ‰ The final batch of winners will be announced next week right here โ€” so keep your eyes open and stay ready! ๐Ÿ‘€โœจ ๐ŸŽ… Helpful tip: Santa loves gifting members who forward this post to multiple places โ€” friendsโ€™ chats, channels, groups, and more! Donโ€™t miss out โ€” join the fun here: ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://t.me/โ€ฆ

โค60๐Ÿคฃ10๐Ÿ˜9โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ8๐Ÿ”ฅ7๐Ÿ‘2๐Ÿคฌ2๐Ÿฅฐ2

18 Dec 2025, 14:33 UTCโ‰ˆ159,000 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026

๐ŸŽ WEEK 3 GIFT ANNOUNCEMENT! The Christmas magic continues! ๐ŸŽ…โœจ Santa has dropped 500 Toncoin ๐Ÿ’Ž & 100 Santa Hats ๐ŸŽฉ for our lucky winners! ๐ŸŽ„๐ŸŽ ๐ŸŽ‰ The third batch of winners will be announced next week right here โ€” so keep your eyes open and stay ready! ๐Ÿ‘€โœจ ๐ŸŽ… Helpful tip: Santa loves gifting members who forward this post to multiple places โ€” friendsโ€™ chats, channels, groups, and more! Donโ€™t miss out โ€” join the fun herโ€ฆ

โค32๐Ÿคฃ9๐Ÿ’ฏ3๐Ÿ˜3๐Ÿ‘2

14 Dec 2025, 12:35 UTCโ‰ˆ135,000 views44 reactionsread 12 August 2026

๐ŸŽ WEEK 2 GIFT ANNOUNCEMENT! The Christmas magic continues! ๐ŸŽ…โœจ Santa has dropped 88,800 Telegram Stars (thatโ€™s 888 stars each) for our lucky winners! ๐ŸŽ„๐ŸŽ ๐ŸŽ‰ The second batch of winners will be announced next week right here โ€” so keep your eyes open and stay ready! ๐Ÿ‘€โœจ ๐ŸŽ… Helpful tip: Santa loves gifting members who have a @username, so make sure yours is set! Donโ€™t miss out โ€” join the fun here: ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://t.me/RealSanโ€ฆ

โค29๐Ÿคฌ9๐Ÿคฃ4๐Ÿ˜2

7 Dec 2025, 10:46 UTCโ‰ˆ105,000 views43 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

๐ŸŽ WEEK 1 GIFT ANNOUNCEMENT! The Christmas magic starts NOW! ๐ŸŽ…โœจ Santa has dropped 100 Telegram Premium gifts (6 months) just for our lucky winners! ๐ŸŽ„๐ŸŽ ๐ŸŽ‰ The first batch of winners will be announced here next week โ€” so keep your eyes on the prize! ๐Ÿ‘€โœจ ๐ŸŽ… And a little secret: Santa loves giving gifts to members who have a @username, so make sure yours is ready! Donโ€™t miss out โ€” join the fun here: ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://t.me/RealSaโ€ฆ

โค32๐Ÿ‘7๐Ÿ‘Ž4

13 Jan 2025, 17:40 UTCโ‰ˆ343,000 views400 reactionsread 12 August 2026

๐Ÿ’Ž Start Deegit Airdrop and earn free TON everyday! ๐Ÿ’Ž

๐Ÿ‘165โค135๐Ÿคฎ52๐Ÿ‘25๐Ÿณ23

1 Jan 2025, 08:00 UTCโ‰ˆ321,000 views255 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿšฉ ๐ŸŽ† Happy New Year ๐ŸŽ† ๐Ÿšฉ โญ๏ธ May 2025 bring you endless joy, success, and cherished moments with loved ones. ๐Ÿ’– ๐Ÿ†” โ€ข @India | @Indian

โค141๐Ÿ‘43๐Ÿคฌ32๐Ÿ™21๐Ÿ”ฅ18

15 Aug 2024, 04:30 UTCโ‰ˆ380,000 views528 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Freedom in the mind ๐Ÿ•Š๐ŸŽŠ Faith in the words ๐Ÿ’“๐ŸŽ‰ Pride in our souls ๐Ÿ•บ๐ŸŽ€ ๐ŸŽˆ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Happy Independence Day ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ ๐ŸŽˆ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ @India | @Indian ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ

โค300๐Ÿซก107๐Ÿ˜48๐Ÿคฏ33๐Ÿฅฐ30๐Ÿคฎ6๐Ÿ‘3๐ŸŒš1

4 Jun 2024, 14:31 UTCโ‰ˆ383,000 views843 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Ab ki baar, _ _ _ _ _ ?

  1. 200 paar26%
  2. 300 paar14%
  3. 400 paar24%
  4. choco bar35%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

๐Ÿคฃ293๐ŸŒ205๐Ÿ‘123โค78๐Ÿคก73๐Ÿ‘Ž13๐Ÿ”ฅ13๐Ÿ˜13

1 Jan 2024, 08:00 UTCโ‰ˆ417,000 views735 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐ŸŽ† ๐Ÿšฉ Happy New Year ๐Ÿšฉ ๐ŸŽ† Wishing you all, have a wealthy and healthy life. ๐Ÿ‘ ๐Ÿ†” โ€ข @Indian

โค337๐Ÿ‘202๐Ÿคฎ45๐ŸŽ‰44๐Ÿ”ฅ31๐Ÿฅฐ23๐Ÿคฃ19๐Ÿ‘14

15 Aug 2023, 01:30 UTCโ‰ˆ521,000 views880 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Freedom in the mind ๐Ÿ•Š๐ŸŽŠ Faith in the words ๐Ÿ’“๐ŸŽ‰ Pride in our souls ๐Ÿ•บ๐ŸŽ€ ๐ŸŽˆ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Happy Independence Day ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ ๐ŸŽˆ Video by kabbolika on IG ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ @India | @Indian ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ

๐Ÿ‘396โค280๐Ÿคฎ63๐Ÿ”ฅ44๐Ÿ‘28๐Ÿค”16๐ŸŒš15๐Ÿคฏ14

26 Jan 2023, 10:30 UTCโ‰ˆ506,000 views1,705 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

โค1,050๐Ÿ‘212๐Ÿฅฐ91๐Ÿคฎ83๐Ÿคฃ57๐Ÿ”ฅ45๐Ÿ‘41๐Ÿ˜35

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @indian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ€” Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Jun 2024, 14:31 UTCAnonymous Poll18,900 voters approx.

Ab ki baar, _ _ _ _ _ ?

  1. 200 paar26%
  2. 300 paar14%
  3. 400 paar24%
  4. choco bar35%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2020 to 1 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 466,544 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œIncredible India ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณโ€ (@indian), 28,815 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/indian.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.