Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 😸 Incredibly_Beautiful 😻

Channel

😸 Incredibly_Beautiful 😻

@incrediblybeauti

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

144subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003050768897
TypeChannel
Username@incrediblybeauti
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 25 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/incrediblybeauti

Growth

1401441427 August 2026 — 140 subscribers8 August 2026 — 142 subscribers8 August 2026 — 142 subscribers16 August 2026 — 144 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 139–145 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 20:23144+2
8 Aug 2026, 21:46142no change
8 Aug 2026, 17:32142+2
7 Aug 2026, 17:34140first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
221.5%
avg views ÷ 144 subscribers
Avg views / post
319
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (25 October 20254 August 2026)
Views total319
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 21:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

138 reactions across 11 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4532.6%
🔥3424.6%
👏1611.6%
💯85.80%
🥰85.80%
👍75.07%
🙈75.07%
42.90%
🙊32.17%
💔21.45%
😍21.45%
🤣10.725%
🤪10.725%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 138reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 October 2025 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC319 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Сегодняшний день - 04.08.2026 - в рассказе Рэя Брэдбери "Будет ласковый дождь". Читала и раньше, но сейчас ощущается вкуснее, отчётливее, ярче. Полный текст - в файле ...Smoke and silence. A great quantity of smoke. Dawn showed faintly in the east. Among the ruins, one wallstood alone. Within the wall, a last voice said, over and over again and again, even as the sun rose to shine upon the heaped rubble and steam:

1🤣1🙈1

1 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC≈1,750 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Прочитала за пару месяцев много. Хорошего и не очень. Отмечу сборник повестей и рассказов "Чёрный и зелёный" современного писателя Дмитрия Данилова. Автобиографическая книга о 90-х, без надрыва и пафоса, с мыслями, переживаниями, событиями простого человека, подмосковным краеведением, изложенная в оригинальной, увлекающей манере. Лёгкая и глубокая одновременно

13🙈1

15 May 2026, 00:51 UTC≈2,910 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Случайно открыла для себя нового писателя - прочитала "Елтышевых" Романа Сенчина. Качественная хтонь. Небольшая книга, читается за день, язык простоват, мне по душе громоздкое и витиевато-изощрённое письмо, полное изъебов и вычурности, но сюжет, атмосфера, эмоциональная окраска и контекстный охват - на уровне. Тотальная безысходность, провинциальный нуар отечественной "эпохи стабильности", разномасштабная социальная

10🔥21🙈1

2 Apr 2026, 23:59 UTC≈3,620 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Прочитала "Улисса" Джойса в переводе Огольцова (с переводом Хоружего знакома раньше). Главный герой Леопольд здесь - не Блум, а Цвейт, нет сложной системы комментариев, которую Хоружий соорудил уже после перевода в целях формирования контекстов, а вот откровенностей и обсценной лексики - больше. Ещё из предисловия узнала, что 16.06.1904 - день, когда будущему автору, засунув руку в карман его брюк, подрочила и довела

🔥1131🙊1

30 Mar 2026, 22:04 UTC≈2,700 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👏51🙈1

13 Feb 2026, 01:34 UTC≈3,320 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯8🙈1

1 Feb 2026, 13:56 UTC≈3,630 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

С нескрываемым удовольствием прочитала школьный учебник по логике 1954 г. (прикрепляю). Стало интересно (да просто помечтала), а как выглядели бы все эти "диспуты", "споры", "обсуждения" и "точки зрения" в соцсетях, мессенджерах и на форумах, если бы их проводники и представители руководствовались изложенным в этой книжке. Написанной очень давно, школьной, которую было не стыдно и очень интересно читать. Родовые и ви

🔥195🙊1

2 Jan 2026, 01:42 UTC≈3,550 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Дорогие друзья, с Новым годом!🎄 Пусть год будет полон радости и удачи, а вы - здоровы и счастливы Ночь, следующая за новогодней, - часто полна меланхолии и пространных размышлений. Не исключаю, что это из-за невольно-инстинктивного сравнения с детскими ощущениями, когда праздник был праздником вне зависимости от обстоятельств и наполнения, а сейчас - со всеми излишествами, условиями и раскайфовками - лишь пресной ка

👏11🥰8💔2😍2🔥1🙈1

15 Dec 2025, 20:04 UTC≈3,050 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Дорогие друзья, прошу поделиться ссылками на каналы (с возможностью комментирования) типа "светского интроверта" - при наличии у Вас таковых. Спасибо🌸

🙊1

6 Dec 2025, 21:39 UTC≈3,060 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Дорогие друзья, огромное Вам спасибо за внимание, теплые слова, обратную связь. Мне бесконечно приятно чувствовать умных людей рядом с собой. Очень ценю и горжусь Вашим искренним интересом к своему скромному творчеству У меня раньше был канал. Без особой тематики. Просто писала там свои мысли, наблюдения, выводы, оценки и прогнозы. На общие темы, связанные с прогрессом, общественной мыслью, диджитализацией жизни, пр

14👍7🤪1

26 Nov 2025, 20:13 UTC≈2,650 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Публикация на случай, если кому-то захочется что-нибудь написать, - можно в комментариях

🔥1🙈1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @incrediblybeauti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,330,605 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“😸 Incredibly_Beautiful 😻” (@incrediblybeauti), 144 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/incrediblybeauti.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.